Skip to main content

Risk Preferences and Loss Aversion in Portfolio Optimization

  • Chapter
Computational Methods in Financial Engineering

Abstract

Traditionally, portfolio optimization is associated with finding the ideal trade-off between return and risk by maximizing the expected utility. Investors’ preferences are commonly assumed to follow a quadratic or power utility function, and asset returns are often assumed to follow a Gaussian distribution. Investment analysis has therefore long been focusing on the first two moments of the distribution, mean and variance. However, empirical asset returns are not normally distributed, and neither utility function captures investors’ true attitudes towards losses. The impact of these specification errors under realistic assumptions is investigated. As traditional optimization techniques cannot deal reliably with the extended problem, the use of a heuristic optimization approach is suggested. It is found that loss aversion has a substantial impact on what investors consider to be an efficient portfolio and that mean-variance analysis alone can be utterly misguiding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: 2003, Consultative document: The new Basel capital accord, Bank for International Settlement, available from: www.bis.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabazon, A. and O’Neill, M.: 2006, Biologically inspired algorithms for financial modeling, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dueck, G. and Scheuer, T.: 1990, Threshold accepting: A general purpose algorithm appearing superior to simulated annealing, Journal of Computational Physics 90, 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, D.B.: 2001, Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence, 2nd edn, IEEE Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M. and KĂ«llezi, E.: 2002, The threshold accepting heuristic for index tracking, in Panos Pardalos and Vassilis Tsitsiringos (eds), Financial engineering, E-commerce, and supply chain, Kluwer Academic Press, Bosten, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M. and KĂ«llezi, E.: 2006, An application of extreme value theory for measuring financial risk, Computational Economics 27(2–3), 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M., KĂ«llezi, E. and Hysi, H.: 2006, A data-driven optimization heuristic for downside risk minimization, The Journal of Risk 8(3), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilli, M., Maringer, D. and Winker, P.: 2008, Applications of heuristics in finance, in D. Seese, C. Weinhardt and F. Schlottmann (eds), IT and Finance, Springer. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H.: 1975, Adaption in Natural and Artificial Systems, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. and Vecchi, M.P.: 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science 220(4598), 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konno, H.: 2005, Applications of global optimization to portfolio analysis, in C. Audet, P. Hansen and G. Savard (eds), Essays and Surveys in Global Optimization, Springer, pp. 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D.: 2005, Portfolio Management with Heuristic Optimization, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D.: 2008, Constrained index tracking under loss aversion using differential evolution, in A. Brabazon and M. O’Neill (eds), Natural Computing in Computational Economics and Finance, Springer, chapter Constrained Index Tracking under Loss Aversion using Differential Evolution, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D. and Meyer, M.: 2008, Smooth transition autoregressive models — new approaches to the model selection process, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D. and Oyewumi, O.: 2007, Index tracking with constrained portfolios, Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 15, 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maringer, D. and Parpas, P.: 2008, Global optimization of higher moments in portfolio selection, Journal of Global Optimization. forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M.: 1952, Portfolio selection, The Journal of Finance 7(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odean, T.: 1998, Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?, Journal of Finance 53, 1775–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parpas, P. and Rustern, B.: 2006, Global optimization of the scenario generation and portfolio selection problems, in M. Gavrilova, O. Gervasi, V. Kumar, C.J.K. Tan, D. Taniar, A. LaganĂ , Y. Mun and H. Choo (eds), Computational Science and Its Applications — ICCSA 2006, Proceedings Part III, Vol. 3982 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, K., Storn, R. and Lampinen, J.: 2005, Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechenberg, I.: 1965, Cybernetic solution path of an experimental problem, Library Translation 1122, Royal Aircraft Establishment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rechenberg, I.: 1973, Evolutionsstrategie: Optimierung technischer Systeme nach Prinzipien der biologischen Evolution, Fromman-Holzboog Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A.: 1963, Risk and uncertainty: A fallacy of large numbers, Scientia XCVIII, 108–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R. and Price, K.: 1995, Differential evolution — a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces, Technical report, International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storn, R. and Price, K.: 1997, Differential evolution — a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces, Journal of Global Optimization 11(4), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R.H., Tversky, A., Kahneman, D. and Schwartz, A.: 1997, The effect of myopia and loss aversion on risk taking: An experimental test, Quaterly Journal of Economics 112, 647–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, J.: 1958, Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk, Review of Economic Studies 26(1), 65–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winker, P.: 2001, Optimization Heuristics in Econometrics. Applications of Threshold Accepting, John Wiley & Sons, ltd., Chichester et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winker, P. and Maringer, D.: 2007, The threshold accepting optimization algorithm in economics and statistics, in E.J. Kontoghiorges and C. Gatu (eds), Advances in Computational Economics, Finance and Management Science, Kluwer, pp. 107–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maringer, D. (2008). Risk Preferences and Loss Aversion in Portfolio Optimization. In: Kontoghiorghes, E.J., Rustem, B., Winker, P. (eds) Computational Methods in Financial Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77958-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics