Skip to main content

GrAM: Reasoning with Grounded Action Models by Combining Knowledge Representation and Data Mining

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4760))

Abstract

This paper proposes GrAM (Grounded Action Models), a novel integration of actions and action models into the knowledge representation and inference mechanisms of agents. In GrAM action models accord to agent behavior and can be specified explicitly and implicitly. The explicit representation is an action class specific set of Markov logic rules that predict action properties. Stated implicitly an action model defines a data mining problem that, when executed, computes the model’s explicit representation. When inferred from an implicit representation the prediction rules predict typical behavior and are learned from a set of training examples, or, in other words, grounded in the respective experience of the agents. Therefore, GrAM allows for the functional and thus adaptive specification of concepts such as the class of situations in which a special action is typically executed successfully or the concept of agents that tend to execute certain kinds of actions.

GrAM represents actions and their models using an upgrading of the representation language OWL and equips the Java Theorem Prover (JTP), a hybrid reasoner for OWL, with additional mechanisms that allow for the automatic acquisition of action models and solving a variety of inference tasks for actions, action models and functional descriptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Minsky, M.L.: The society of mind. Simon and Schuster (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beetz, M., Flossmann, S., Stammeier, T.: Motion and episode models for (simulated) football games: Acquisition, representation, and use. In: Kudenko, D., Kazakov, D., Alonso, E. (eds.) AAMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3394, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beetz, M., Kirchlechner, B., Lames, M.: Computerized real-time analysis of football games. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4, 33–39 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, D., (ed.): Special Issue on the 3rd International Planning Competition. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bechhofer, S., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D., Patel-Schneider, P., Stein, L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, W3C Recommendation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fikes, R., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL-QL: A Language for Deductive Query Answering on the Semantic Web. Technical Report KSL 03-14, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, Technical Report (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McCarthy, J.: Situations, actions and causal laws. Technical report, Stanford University (1963) Minsky, M. (ed.): Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge (Reprinted 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Domingos, P., Richardson, M.: Markov logic: A unifying framework for statistical relational learning. In: Proceedings of the ICML 2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connection to Other Fields, Banff, Canada, IMLS, pp. 49–54 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Frank, G., Fikes, R., Jenkins, J.: JTP: A system architecture and component library for hybrid reasoning. In: Procs. of the 7th World Multiconf. Systemics, Cybernetics, and Informatics, Orlando, Florida, USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brachman, R.: Systems that know what they’re doing. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 67–71 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Allen, J., Ferguson, G.: Actions and events in interval temporal logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 4, 531–579 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Oates, T., Schmill, M., Cohen, P.: Identifying qualitatively different outcomes of actions: Gaining autonomy through learning. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 110–111. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Pasula, H., Zettlemoyer, L., Kaelbling, L.: Learning probabilistic relational planning rules. In: Procs. of the 14th International Conference on Planning and Scheduling (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stulp, F., Beetz, M.: Optimized execution of action chains using learned performance models of abstract actions. In: IJCAI. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Beetz, M., Kirsch, A., Müller, A.: RPL-LEARN: Extending an autonomous robot control language to perform experience-based learning. In: AAMAS. 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stulp, F., Beetz, M.: Action awareness – enabling agents to optimize, transform, and coordinate plans. In: AAMAS. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kranz, M., Rusu, R.B., Maldonado, A., Beetz, M., Schmidt, A.: A player/stage system for context-aware intelligent environments. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 17–21. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rusu, R.B.: Acquiring models of everyday activities for robotic control in current PhD research in pervasive computing. Technical Reports - University of Munich, Department of Computer Science, Media Informatics Group LMU-MI-2005-3 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Erich Rome Joachim Hertzberg Georg Dorffner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoyningen-Huene, N.v., Kirchlechner, B., Beetz, M. (2008). GrAM: Reasoning with Grounded Action Models by Combining Knowledge Representation and Data Mining. In: Rome, E., Hertzberg, J., Dorffner, G. (eds) Towards Affordance-Based Robot Control. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4760. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77915-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77915-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77914-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77915-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics