Skip to main content

Patient Management and Referrals: The Impact of High-resolution Steady state MRA with Vasovist®

  • Chapter
Clinical Blood Pool MR Imaging

Abstract

Since its introduction in 1993, three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography (3D CEMRA) has made tremendous progress and now is routinely used in the assessment of arterial stenosis of the vasculature in many centers as an alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) [14]. However, DSA still is considered the standard of reference due to its superior spatial resolution, even though it does not provide the advantages of a 3D data set in post-processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lenhart M, Finkenzeller T, Paetzel C, Strotzer M, Mann S, Djavidani B, et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the routine work-up of the lower extremity arteries [in German]. Rofo 174:1289–1295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nikolaou K, Kramer H, Grosse C, Clevert D, Dietrich O, Hartmann M, et al (2006) High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience. Radiology 241:861–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prince MR, Yucel EK, Kaufman JA, Harrison DC, Geller SC (1993) Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional abdominal MR arteriography. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:877–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Willinek WA, von Falkenhausen M, Born M, Gieseke J, Holler T, Klockgether T, et al (2005) Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 36:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goyen M, Edelman M, Perreault P, O’Riordan E, Bertoni H, Taylor J, et al (2005) MR angiography of aortoiliac occlusive disease: a phase III study of the safety and effectiveness of the blood-pool contrast agent MS-325. Radiology 236:825–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rapp JH, Wolff SD, Quinn SF, Soto JA, Meranze SG, Muluk S, et al (2005) Aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease: safety and efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography—multicenter comparative phase III study. Radiology 236:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grist TM, Korosec FR, Peters DC, Witte S, Walovitch RC, Dolan RP, et al (1998) Steady state and dynamic MR angiography with MS-325: initial experience in humans. Radiology 207:539–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Corot C, Violas X, Robert P, Gagneur G, Port M (2003) Comparison of different types of blood pool agents (P792, MS325, USPIO) in a rabbit MR angiography-like protocol. Invest Radiol 38:311–319

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch AT, Criqui MH, Treat-Jacobson D, Regensteiner JG, Creager MA, Olin JW, et al (2001) Peripheral arterial disease detection, awareness, and treatment in primary care. JAMA 286:1317–1324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hirsch AT, Murphy TP, Lovell MB, Twillman G, Treat-Jacobson D, Harwood EM, et al (2007) Gaps in public knowledge of peripheral arterial disease. The First National PAD Public Awareness Survey. Circulation

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leiner T, Tordoir JH, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, Schurink GW, Kitslaar PJ, et al (2003) Comparison of treatment plans for peripheral arterial disease made with multi-station contrast medium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg 37:1255–1262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM (2000) Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology 217:105–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hany TF, Debatin JF, Leung DA, Pfammatter T (1997) Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography. Radiology 204:357–362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM (2001) Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 285:1338–1345

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Debatin JF (2002) MR angiography: first choice for diagnosis of the arterial vascular system [in German]. Rofo 174:551–561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perreault P, Edelman MA, Baum RA, Yucel EK, Weisskoff RM, Shamsi K, et al (2003) MR angiography with gadofosveset trisodium for peripheral vascular disease: phase II trial. Radiology 229:811–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hadizadeh D, Gieseke J, Loetsch R, Verrel F, Schild H, Willinek WA (2007) Peripheral MR angiography with Vasovist: intraindividual comparison of first pass and steady state imaging of the upper and lower legs. Eur Radiol 17(S1):317

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hadizadeh D, Gieseke J, Bayer T, Voth M, Loetsch R, Verrel F, et al (2007) MR Angiographie der Beingefäße mittels Vasovist: Intra-individueller Vergleich bei Verwendung von arterieller Phase-und Steady State-Bildgebung. Rofo 179(S1):S171

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hadizadeh D, Gieseke J, Loetsch R, Verrel F, Schild H, Willinek WA (2007) High resolution steady state imaging of peripheral arteries with a blood pool agent compared with standard first pass imaging and DSA: assessing the clinical benefit. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 15:2498

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hoogeveen RM, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA (1998) Limits to the accuracy of vessel diameter measurement in MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1228–1235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoenberg SO, Rieger J, Weber CH, Michaely HJ, Waggershauser T, Ittrich C, et al (2005) High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US. Radiology 235:687–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharafuddin MJ, Stolpen AH, Sun S, Leusner CR, Safvi AA, Hoballah JJ, et al (2002) High-resolution multiphase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography compared with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography for the identification of pedal vessels. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13:695–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink C, Goyen M, Lotz J (2007) Expanding role of MR angiography in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 17 [Suppl 2]:B38–B44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Willinek, W.A., Hadizadeh, D.R. (2008). Patient Management and Referrals: The Impact of High-resolution Steady state MRA with Vasovist® . In: Leiner, T., Goyen, M., Rohrer, M., Schönberg, S. (eds) Clinical Blood Pool MR Imaging. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77861-5_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77861-5_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77860-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77861-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics