Digital elevation models (DEM) are representations of topography but with unavoidable inherent errors, which result in DEM uncertainty. Entities are spatially dependent and with autocorrelation related to distance. The spatial autocorrelation of the DEM error will systematically affect the result of terrain analysis. It should be taken into account when calculating slope from a grid-based DEM. The effect of the accuracy of slope calculation models on terrain analysis based on quantitative models could be very significant. DEM uncertainty and error propagation is hard to describe with a single, fixed and analytical error based on spatial databases. The Monte Carlo simulation technique is an effective method to simulate error fields and can be used to research the DEM error’s spatial autocorrelation and DEM uncertainty. The accuracy of slopes is studied and four commonly used slope algorithms, namely, the 2nd Finite Difference, 3rd order Finite Difference, 3rd order Finite Difference Weighted by Reciprocal of Squared Distance, and 3rd order Finite Difference Weighted by Reciprocal of Distance, are compared theoretically in this paper based on the error being spatially dependent and autocorrelated. The theoretical results are confirmed by Monte Carlo simulation experiments using three digital elevation model data sets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Abstract
Burrough P.A. and McDonnell, R.A., (1998), Principles of Geographical Information System, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Ehlschlaeger C.R. and Shortridge, A., (1996), Modeling Elevation Uncertainty in Geographical Analyses, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Delft, Netherland, 9B: 15–25.
Ehlschlaeger C.R., (1998), The Stochastic Simulation Approach: Tools for Representing Spatial Application Uncertainty, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Fisher P.F., (1991), First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: The accuracy of the viewshed area, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (57)10: 1321–1327.
Fisher P. F., (1994), Probable and fuzzy models of the viewshed operation. In Worboys, W. F. (ed.): Innovations in GIS 1: 161–176.
Fleming M.D. and Hoffer, R.M., (1979), Machine processing of Landsat MSS data and DMA topographic data for forest cover type mapping: LARS Technical Report 062879, West Lafayette, IN: Purdue, University, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing.
Florinsky I.V., (1998a), Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models, INT. J. Geographical Information Science, (12)1: 47–61.
Florinsky I.V., (1998b) Combined analysis of digital terrain models and remotely sensed data in landscape investigations, Progress in Physical Geography, (22)1: 33–60.
Heuvelink B.M., (1998), Error Propagation in Environmental Modeling with GIS, Taylor and Francis.
Horn B.K.P. (1981), Hill shading and the reflectance map, Proceedings of IEEE, (69)1: 14–47.
Hunter G. J. and Goodchild, M.F., (1997) Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases, Geographical Analysis, (29)1: 35–49.
Lee J., Snyder, P.K. and Fisher, P.F., (1992) Modeling the effect of data errors on feature extraction from digital elevation models, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (58)10: 1461–1467.
Lee J., (1996) Digital Elevation Models: Issues of Data Accuracy and Applications, ESRI User Conference, www.esri.com/resources/userconf/proc96.
Liu R., (1994), The Effects of Spatial Data Errors on the Grid-Based Forest management Decisions, Ph.D. Dissertation, State University Of New York College Of Environmental Science and Forestry, Syracuse, NY.
Liu Xuejun, (2002), On the Accuracy of the Algorithms for Interpreting Grid-based Digital Terrain Model, PhD Thesis, Wuhan Univeisity.
Moore I.D., Grayson, R.B. and Ladson, A.R., (1991), Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications, Hydrological Processes, 5, 3–30.
Moore I.D., (1996), Hydrologic Modeling and GIS, In Gooldchild, M.F., Steyaert, L.T., Parks, B.O., Crane, M.P., Maidment, D.R. and Glendinning, S. (eds.): GIS and Environmental modeling: Progress and Research Issuse, Fort Collins, CO: GIS World Books: 143–148.
Oksanen J. and Sarjakoshi, T., (2005) Error propagation analysis of DEM-based surface derivatives, Computers & Geosciences, 31: 1015–1027.
Openshaw S., Charlton, M. and Carver, S., (1991) Error Propagation: a Monte Carlo simulation, In Masser, I. and Blakemore, M., (eds.): Handling Geographic Information, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Ritter D., (1987), A vector-based slope and aspect generation algorithm, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (53)8: 1109–1111.
Sharpnack D.A. and Akin, G., (1969), An Algorithm for computing slope and aspect from elevations, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 5: 247–248.
Skidmore A.K., (1989), A comparison of techniques for the calculation of gradient and aspect from a gridded digital elevation model, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 3: 323-334.
Unwin D., (1981), Introductory Spatial Analysis, London and New York: Methuen.
Wechsler S.W., (1999), A methodology for digital elevation model (DEM) uncertainty evaluation: the effect DEM uncertainty on topographic parameters, URISA 99 Annual Conference Proceeding.
Wood J.D., (1996), The geomorphological characterisation of digital elevation model, PhD Thesis, University of Leicester.
Zevenbergen L.W. and Thorne, C.R., (1987), Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56.
Zhou Q. and Liu, X., (2002), Error assessment of grid-based flow routing algorithms used in hydrological models, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (16)8: 819–842.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xuejun, L., Lu, B. (2008). Accuracy Assessment of DEM Slope Algorithms Related to Spatial Autocorrelation of DEM Errors. In: Zhou, Q., Lees, B., Tang, Ga. (eds) Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77799-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77800-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)