Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing Uncertainties in Derived Slope and Aspect from a Grid DEM

  • Chapter
Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Digital elevation data are the most frequently used for computer-based terrain analysis and they form an integral part of today’s GIS data analysis capability. For most GIS-based environmental studies, primary topographic parameters such as slope, aspect, and drainage network are often required for specific environmental models. While derived from digital elevation data, particularly the grid-based Digital Elevation Models (DEM), the parameters often display noticeable uncertainties due to errors (a) in the data, (b) inherent to the data structure, and (c) created by algorithms that derive the parameters from the DEM. Some contradictory results have been reported in evaluating the results of various terrain analysis algorithms, largely because of the variety in the assessment methodologies and the difficulties in separating errors in data from those generated by the algorithms.

This chapter reports on an approach to the assessment of the uncertainties in grid-based Digital Terrain Analysis (DTA) algorithms used for deriving slope and aspect. A quantitative methodology has been developed for objective and data-independent assessment of errors generated from the algorithms that extract morphologic parameters from grid DEMs. The generic approach is to use artificial surfaces that can be described by mathematical models; thus the ‘true’ output value can be pre-determined to avoid uncertainty caused by uncontrollable data errors. Tests were carried out on a number of algorithms for slope and aspect computation. The actual output values from these algorithms on the mathematical surfaces were compared with the theoretical ‘true’ values, and the errors were then analysed statistically. The strengths and weaknesses of the selected algorithms are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Band, L.E., (1986), Topographic partition of watershed with digital elevation models, Water Resources Research, 22(1): 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesemans, J., Meirvenne, M.V. and Gabriels, D., (2000), Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average off-site sediment accumulation, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55(1): 35–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolstad, P.V. and Stowe, T.J., (1994). An evaluation of DEM accuracy: elevation, slope and aspect, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (60)11: 1327–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrough, P.A. and McDonnell, R.A., (1998), Principles of Geographical Information System, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, J., (1992), The effect of data precision on the calculation of slope and aspect using gridded DEMs, Cartographica, (29)1: 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. and Tsai, B., (1991), The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping, Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 18: 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, T.H. and Tsai, T.H., (1995), Comparison of accuracy and algorithms of slope and aspect measures from DEM, Proceedings of GIS AM/FM ASIA’95, 21–24 August, Bangkok: I–1–1 – I–1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.W. and Dozier, J., (1990), Information analysis of spatial database for ecological land classification, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56: 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, P.J.J. and Govers, G., (1996), Comparison of routing algorithms for digital elevation models and their implication for predicting ephemeral gullies, International Journal of Geographical Information science, (10)10: 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, W.E., Wilson, C.J., Montgomery, D.R. and McKean, J., (1993), Analysis of erosion thresholds, channel networks, and landscape morphology using a digital terrain model, The Journal of Geology, 10: 259–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J. and Grant, G.E., (2000), Shallow landslide delineation for steep forest watersheds based on topographic attributes and probability analysis, In Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C. (eds.): Terrain Analysis: Principles and Application, New York: John Wiley & Sons: 311–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M.D. and Hoffer, R.M., (1979), Machine processing of Landsat MSS data and LARS Technical Report 062879, West Lafayette, Indiana: Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky I.V., (1998), Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (12)1: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky, I.V. and Kuryakova, G.A., (2000), Determination of grid size for digital terrain modeling in landscape investigations—exemplified by soil moisture distribution at a mirco-scale, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (14)8: 815–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T.G., (1991), Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid, Computer and Geosciences,(17)3: 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, J., (1998), Impact of sampling intervals on the reliability of topographic variables mapped from grid DEMs at a micro-scale, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (12)8: 875–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbrecht, J. and Martz, L.W., (1994), Grid size dependency of parameters extracted from digital elevation models, Computer and Geosciences, (20)1: 85–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, M.E., (1995), What cell size does the computed slope/aspect angle represent? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61: 513–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, P., (1994), Multiple flow direction algorithm for runoff modelling in grid based elevation models: an empirical evaluation, Hydrology Processes, 8: 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, B.K.P., (1981), Hill shading and the reflectance map, Proceedings of IEEE, (69)1: 14–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, G.J. and Goodchild, M.F., (1997), Modeling the uncertainty of slope and aspect estimates derived from spatial databases, Geographical Analysis, (29)1: 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K.H., (1998), A comparison of algorithms used to compute hill slope as a property of the DEM, Computer and Geosciences, (24)4: 315–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Zhu, Q. and Gold, C., (2005), Digital Terrain Modelling: Principles and Methodology, Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitasova, H., Hofierka, J., Zlocha, M. and Iverson, L.R., (1996), Modelling topographic potential for erosion deposition using GIS, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, (10)5: 629–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, I.D., O’Loughlin, E. M. and Burch, G.J., (1988), A contour-based topographic model for huydrological and ecological applications, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 13: 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Loughlin, E.M., (1986), Prediction of surface saturation zones in natural catchments by topographic analysis, Water Resources Research, 22: 794–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilesjö, P., Zhou, Q. and Harrie, L., (1998), Estimating flow distribution over digital elevation models using a form-based algorithm, Geographical Information Science, (4)1: 44–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn , P.F., Beven, K.J. and Lamb, R., (1995), The ln(a/tanβ ) index: how to calculate it and how to use it within the TOPMODEL framwork, Hydrological Processes, 9: 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, D., (1987), A vector-based slope and aspect generation algorithm. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (53)8: 1109–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpnack, D.A. and Akin, G., (1969), An Algorithm for computing slope and aspect from elevations, Photogrammetric Survey, 35: 247–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, A.K., (1989), A comparison of techniques for the calculation of gradient and aspect from a griided digital evevation model, International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, (3)4: 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, J.V. and Irvin, B.J., (2000), Automated landform classification methods for soil-landscape studies, In Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C. (eds.): Terrain Analysis: Principles and Application, New York: John Wiley & Sons: 267–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, G., (2000), A Research on the Accuracy of Digital Elevation Models, Beijing: Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, D.M., (1989), Accuracy and bias issues in surface representation, In Goodchild, M.F. and Gopal, S. (eds.): The Accuracy of Spatial Database, New York: Taylor and Francis: 99–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, D., (1981), Introductory Spatial Analysis, London and New York: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.P. and Willgoose, G.R., (1999), On the effect of digital elevation model accuracy on hydrology and geomorphology, Water Resources Research, (35)7: 2259–2268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J.C. (eds.), (2000), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolock, D.M. and Price, C.V., (1994), Effects of digital elevation model and map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model, Water Resources Research, 30: 3041–3052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J.D., (1996), The Geomorphological Characterisation of Digital Elevation Model, PhD Thesis, University of Leicester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, L.W. and Thorne, C.R., (1987), Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.H. and Montgomery, D.R., (1994), Digital elevation models grid size, landscape representation, and hydrologic simulations, Water Resources Research, (30)4: 1019–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q. and Liu, X., (2002), Error assessment of grid-based flow routing algorithms used in hydrological models, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, (16)8: 819–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q. and Liu, X., (2004a), Error analysis on grid-based slope and aspect algorithms, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (70)8: 957–962.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q. and Liu, X., (2004b), Analysis of errors of derived slope and aspect related to DEM data properties, Computers and Geosciences, 30: 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Liu, X. and Sun, Y., (2006), Terrain complexity and uncertainties in grid-based digital terrain analysis, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(9): 1137–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. ZHOU Qiming
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. LIU Xuejun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geography, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowlon Tong, Kowlooon, Hong Kong/PR China

    Qiming Zhou (Prof.) (Prof.)

  2. The University of New South Wales at ADFA, ACT 2600, Australia

    Brian Lees (Prof.) (Prof.)

  3. Key Laboratory of Virtual Geographic Environment, Nanjing Normal University, 210046 Nanjing, China, People’s Republic

    Guo-an Tang (Prof.) (Prof.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Qiming, Z., Xuejun, L. (2008). Assessing Uncertainties in Derived Slope and Aspect from a Grid DEM. In: Zhou, Q., Lees, B., Tang, Ga. (eds) Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation