Skip to main content

Economic Modeling and Decision Making in the Development and Clinical Application of Tissue Engineering

  • Chapter
Fundamentals of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Abstract

Tissue engineering in regenerative medicine has become one of the most promising subjects in current medical research. A number of procedures based on or involving tissue engineering have already been approved for human application and are clinically available, and numerous others are on the edge of becoming so. During the development of a new procedure and the process of its approval, repeated evaluations, focusing on different aspects, are necessary. Initial studies focus on the effect of a treatment; subsequently its efficacy and effectiveness as well as safety profiles are established. Before a procedure will be directed towards clinical application, economic evaluations are done assessing whether further investment of scarce resources is justified. In public health such justification is consistent with showing a highly effective treatment and ruling out that the same investment could result in more productive research or a more effective treatment elsewhere, while from a microeconomic perspective potential revenue is addressed. Such argumentation is a source of much debate, but can hardly be avoided given a true scarcity of resources and increasing costs of health care. Due to the increasing importance of such issues, especially in a high end, multidisciplinary field such as tissue engineering, knowledge on the principles of economic evaluation has become a valuable addition to a researcher’s expertise. It is the objective of this chapter to give a concise introduction to economic modeling and resulting decision-making strategies in health care in the evaluation of tissue engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atala A, Freeman MR, Vacanti JP, et al. (1993) Implantation in vivo and retrieval of artificial structures consisting of rabbit and human urothelium and human bladder muscle. J Urol 150:608–612

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atala A, Bauer SB, Soker S, et al. (2006) Tissue-engineered autologous bladders for patients needing cystoplasty. Lancet 367:1241–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basad E, Stürz H, Steinmeyer J (2004) Die Behandlung chondraler Defekte mit MACI oder microfracture—erste Ergebnisse einer vergleichenden klinischen Studie. Orthop Prax 40:6–10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bentley G, Biant LC, Carrington RWJ, et al. (2003) A prospective, randomized comparison of autologous chondrocyte implantation versus mosaicplasty for osteochondral defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-B:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Eng J Med 331:889–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clar C, Cummins E, McIntyre L, et al. (2005) Clinical and cost-effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects in knee joints: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 9:1–82

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dozin B, Malpeli M, Cancedda R, et al. (2005) Comparative evaluation of autologous chondrocyte implantation and mosaicplasty: a multicentered randomized clinical trial. Clin J Sport Med 15:220–226

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edejer Tt, Baltussen R, Adam T, et al. (2003) WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. WHO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frimberger D, Lin HK, Kropp BP (2006) The use of tissue engineering and stem cells in bladder regeneration. Regen Med 1:425–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Guan Y, Ou L, Hu G, et al. (2008) Tissue engineering of urethra using human vascular endothelial growth factor gene-modified bladder urothelial cells. Artif Organs 32:91–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammit JK (2002) QALYs versus WTP. Risk Anal 22:985–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, et al. (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint: a prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:185–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC, et al. (2004) Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, et al. (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2105–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lindahl A, Brittberg M, Peterson L (2001) Health economics benefits following autologous chondrocyte transplantation for patients with focal chondral lesions of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:358–363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McAteer H, Cosh E, Freeman G, et al. (2007) Cost-effectiveness analysis at the development phase of a potential health technology: examples based on tissue engineering of bladder and urethra. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 1:343–349

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Minas T (1999) Chondral lesions of the knee: comparisons of treatments and treatment costs. Am J Orthop 28:374

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, et al. (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 212–234

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, et al. (2003) Treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: results at two to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:17–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saris D (2007) Prospective multi-center randomized controlled trial of ChondroCelect (in an autologous chondrocyte transplantation procedure) versus microfracture (as procedure) in the repair of symptomatic cartilaginous defects of the femoral condyles of the knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, February 14–18, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, et al. (2008) Characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better structural repair when treating symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee in a randomized controlled trial versus microfracture. Am J Sports Med 36:235–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Thornton JG, Lilford RJ, Johnson N (1992) Decision analysis in medicine. BMJ 304:1099–1103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vavken P, Gruber M, Dorotka R (2008) Tissue Engineering in orthopedic surgery—clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Z Orthop Unfall 146:26–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wildner M, Shangha O, Behrend C (2000) Wirtschaftlichkeitsuntersuchung zur autologen Chondrozytentransplantation. Arthroskopie 13:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wood JJ, Malek MA, Frassica FJ, et al. (2006) Autologous cultured chondrocytes: adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:503–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vavken, P., Dorotka, R., Gruber, M. (2009). Economic Modeling and Decision Making in the Development and Clinical Application of Tissue Engineering. In: Meyer, U., Handschel, J., Wiesmann, H., Meyer, T. (eds) Fundamentals of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77755-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77755-7_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77754-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77755-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics