Skip to main content

Trade-Off between Sample Size and Accuracy: Case of Dynamic Measurements under Interval Uncertainty

  • Chapter
Interval / Probabilistic Uncertainty and Non-Classical Logics

Part of the book series: Advances in Soft Computing ((AINSC,volume 46))

Summary

In many practical situations, we are not satisfied with the accuracy of the existing measurements. There are two possible ways to improve the measurement accuracy:

  • first, instead of a single measurement, we can make repeated measurements; the additional information coming from these additional measurements can improve the accuracy of the result of this series of measurements;

  • second, we can replace the current measuring instrument with a more accurate one; correspondingly, we can use a more accurate (and more expensive) measurement procedure provided by a measuring lab – e.g., a procedure that includes the use of a higher quality reagent.

In general, we can combine these two ways, and make repeated measurements with a more accurate measuring instrument. What is the appropriate trade-off between sample size and accuracy? In our previous paper, we solved this problem for the case of static measurements. In this paper, we extend the results to the case of dynamic measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 209.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dravskikh, A., Finkelstein, A.M., Kreinovich, V.: Astrometric and geodetic applications of VLBI ‘arc method’. In: Modern Astrometry, Proceedings of the IAU Colloquium, Vienna, vol. 48, pp. 143–153 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dravskikh, A.F., et al.: Possibility of using a reference-object method to form a phase-stable multielement long-baseline interferometric system. In: Bulletin of the Special Astrophysical Observatory – North Caucasus, vol. 16, pp. 72–80. Allerton Press, NY (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dravskikh, A.F., et al.: The method of arcs and differential astrometry. Soviet Astronomy Letters 5(3), 160–162 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dravskikh, A.F., et al.: Optimization of the procedure for measuring arcs by radiointerferometry. Soviet Astronomy Letters 5(4), 227–228 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kreinovich, V., et al.: Interval estimates for closure phase and closure amplitude imaging in radio astronomy. Interval Computations 2(4), 51–71 (1992)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Kreinovich, V., et al.: Computational complexity and feasibility of data processing and interval computations. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kreinovich, V., et al.: Open-ended configurations of radio telescopes: A geometrical analysis. Geombinatorics 13(2), 79–85 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Kreinovich, V., et al.: Open-ended configurations of radio telescopes: Towards optimal design. In: Proceedings of the 2002 World Automation Congress WAC 2002, Orlando, Florida, June 9–13, 2002, pp. 101–106 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mandelbrot, B.B.: The fractal geometry of Nature. Freeman, San Francisco (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen, H.T., Kreinovich, V.: Applications of continuous mathematics to computer science. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen, H.T., Kreinovich, V.: Trade-off between sample size and accuracy: Case of dynamic measurements (in these proceedings)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Novitskii, P.V., Zograph, I.A.: Estimating the Measurement Errors. Energoatomizdat, Leningrad (in Russian) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Orlov, A.I.: How often are the observations normal? Industrial Laboratory 57(7), 770–772 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rabinovich, S.: Measurement Errors and Uncertainties: Theory and Practice. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sheskin, D.J.: Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Stevens, D.: Analysis of biological systems. In: Proceedings of the NIH MARC Winter Institute on Undergraduate Education in Biology, January 7–11, 2005, Santa Cruz, California (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verschuur, G.L., Kellerman, K.I.: Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy. Springer, NY (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Van-Nam Huynh Yoshiteru Nakamori Hiroakira Ono Jonathan Lawry Vkladik Kreinovich Hung T. Nguyen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nguyen, H.T., Kosheleva, O., Kreinovich, V., Ferson, S. (2008). Trade-Off between Sample Size and Accuracy: Case of Dynamic Measurements under Interval Uncertainty. In: Huynh, VN., Nakamori, Y., Ono, H., Lawry, J., Kreinovich, V., Nguyen, H.T. (eds) Interval / Probabilistic Uncertainty and Non-Classical Logics. Advances in Soft Computing, vol 46. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77664-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77664-2_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77663-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77664-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics