Skip to main content

Artificial Development

  • Chapter
Organic Computing

Part of the book series: Understanding Complex Systems ((UCS))

Summary

There is growing interest in the use of analogies of biological development for problem solving in computer science. Nature is extremely intricate when compared to human designs, and incorporates features such as the ability to scale, adapt and self-repair that could be usefully incorporated into human-designed artifacts. In this chapter, we discuss how the metaphor of biological development can be used in artificial systems and highlight some of the challenges of this emerging field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Banzhaf and C. Lasarczyk. Genetic programming of an algorithmic chemistry. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice II, 8:175–190, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Banzhaf, P. Nordin, R. Keller, and F. Francone. Genetic Programming: An Introduction. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Bentley. Investigations into graceful degradation of evolutionary developmental software. Natural Computing, 4(4):417–437, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Bentley and S. Kumar. Three ways to grow designs: A comparison of embryogenies for an evolutionary design problem. In W. Banzhaf, J. Daida, A. E. Eiben, M. H. Garzon, V. Honavar, M. Jakiela, and R. E. Smith, editors, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, volume 1, pages 35–43, Orlando, Florida, USA, 13-17 1999. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Carrascal, D. Manrique, D. Pérez, J. Ríos, and C. Rossi. Growing axons evolving l-systems. In M. Hamza, editor, proceedings Artificial Intelligence and Applications, volume 403. Acta Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. L. Downing. Developmental models for emergent computation. In A. M. Tyrrell, P. C. Haddow, and J. Torresen, editors, International Conference on Evolvable Systems(ICES), volume 2606 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 105–116. Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Eiben and J. Smith. Introduction to Evolutionary Computing. Springer, Berlin, 2003.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Escuela, G. Ochoa, and N. Krasnogor. Evolving L-systems to capture protein structure native conformations. In M. Keijzer, A. Tettamanzi, P. Collet, J. I. van Hemert, and M. Tomassini, editors, Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Genetic Programming, volume 3447 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 74–84, Lausanne, Switzerland, 30 Mar. - 1 Apr. 2005. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Federici. Evolving developing spiking neural networks. In proceedings of CEC 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pages 543– 550, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Forgacs and S. A. Newman. Biological Physics Of The Developing Embryo. Cambridge University Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Gerhart and M. Kirschner. Cells, embryos, and evolution : toward a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell Science, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Gruau. Neural Network Synthesis using Cellular Encoding and the Genetic Algorithm. PhD thesis, Laboratoire de l’Informatique du Parallilisme, Ecole Normale Supirieure de Lyon, France, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. Gruau, D. Whitley, and L. Pyeatt. A comparison between cellular encoding and direct encoding for genetic neural networks. In J. R. Koza, D. E. Goldberg, D. B. Fogel, and R. L. Riolo, editors, Genetic Programming 1996: Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, pages 81–89, Stanford University, CA, USA, 28–31 1996. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Harding. Evolution In Materio. PhD thesis, University of York, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Harding and J. F. Miller. The dead state: A comparison between developmental and direct encodings. In GECCO ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  16. G. S. Hornby and J. B. Pollack. The advantages of generative grammatical encodings for physical design. In Proceedings of the 2001 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC2001, pages 600–607, COEX, World Trade Center, 159 Samseong-dong, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Korea, 27-30 2001. IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Kitano. Designing neural networks using genetic algorithms with graph generation system. Complex Systems, 4(4):461–467, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Lehre and P. Haddow. Developmental mappings and phenotypic complexity. In proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation(CEC) 2003, pages 62–68, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Matos, R. Suzuki, and T. Arita. Evolutionary models for maternal effects in simulated developmental systems. In GECCO ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pages 149–150, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Miller and M. Hartmann. Untidy evolution: Evolving messy gates for fault tolerance. In Proceedings of The 4th International Conference on Evolvable Systems: From Biology to Hardware, ICES2001, volume 2210 of Lecture notes in computer science, pages 14–25, Tokyo, Japan, 2001. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. F. Miller. Evolving a self-repairing, self-regulating, french flag organism. In K. Deb, R. Poli, W. Banzhaf, H.-G. Beyer, E. K. Burke, P. J. Darwen, D. Dasgupta, D. Floreano, J. A. Foster, M. Harman, O. Holland, P. L. Lanzi, L. Spector, A. Tettamanzi, D. Thierens, and A. M. Tyrrell, editors, GECCO (1), volume 3102 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 129–139. Springer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Mitchell. An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Nüsslein-Volhard. Coming To Life. W. W. Norton and Company, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Ortega-Sanchez, D. Mange, S. Smith, and A. Tyrrell. Embryonics: A bio-inspired cellular architecture with fault-tolerant properties. Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 1(3):187–215, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Qiu. Epigenetics: unfinished symphony. Nature, 441:143–145, May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Roemer, W. Reik, W. Dean, and J. Klose. Epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Current Biology, 7:277–280, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Roggen and D. Federici. Multi-cellular development: is there scalability and robustness to gain? In X. Yao, E. Burke, and J. L. et al., editors, proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature 8, Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (PPSN) 2004, pages 391–400, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Siddiqi and S. Lucas. A comparison of matrix rewriting versus direct encoding for evolving neural networks. In Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, (Piscataway, NJ, USA), pages 392–397. IEEE Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  29. U. Technau and T. Holstein. Cell sorting during the regeneration of hydra from reaggregated cells. Developmental biology, 151(1):117–27, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Thompson and C. Wasshuber. Design of single electron systems through artificial evolution. In Int. J. Circuit Theory and Applications, volume 28 (6), pages 585–599, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harding, S., Banzhaf, W. (2009). Artificial Development. In: Organic Computing. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77657-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics