Skip to main content

Framework for Analysing Institutional Capacity for Wetland Management: The Case of the Gemenc Floodplain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Implementing Adaptation Strategies by Legal, Economic and Planning Instruments on Climate Change

Part of the book series: Environmental Protection in the European Union ((ENVPROTEC,volume 4))

  • 1012 Accesses

Abstract

Water is one of the most important natural resources in the context of adaptation to global climate change (GWP 2007). The changing global climate is leading to significant effects on the availability and allocation of water in most river basins. Water collection, filtration and storage in wetlands will play an increasingly important role to secure drinking water and fish supply, availability of water for irrigation and wastewater management or even flood protection. Wetlands provide important services for local communities (e.g. food, drinking water, wild products and raw materials for industry) and play an important role in water purification, flow regulation, and spreading of waterborne diseases. At the same time many wetlands are vulnerable to climate change, e.g. to changes in water allocation or nutrient loading. Junk (2002) and Zsuffa et al. (2008) predict that the increased droughts, water consumption and waste water production will result in further degradation of wetland ecosystems worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Not considered are organizational or individual capacities.

  2. 2.

    A variety of authors have argued that the reality of the policy process is very different and much more irrational and incremental than the rational approach would suggest (Lindblom 1959; Cohen et al. 1972; Kingdon 1984; March and Olson 1984) or as Turner and Hulme (1997, p. 58) argue ‘any lingering idea that policy is some highly rational process in which expert technicians are firmly in control using finely tuned instruments to achieve easily predicted outcomes’ must ‘be banished’.

References

  • Alaerts GJ, Kaspersma JM (2009) Progress and challenges in knowledge and capacity development. In: Blokland MW, Alaerts GJ, Kaspersma JM (eds) Capacity development for improved water management. CRC Press, Netherlands, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Baser H, Morgan P (2008) Capacity, change and performance study report, Discussion Paper No 59B, European centre for development policy management

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M, March J, Olsen J (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin Sci Quart 17(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis I, Haghebeart B, Peppiatt D (2004) Social vulnerability and capacity analysis. discussion paper and workshop report, Provention consortium: Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar A, Saleth RM (2004) The institutional economics of water: a cross-country analysis of institutions and performance. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Douven W and Schwartz K (lead authors) (2009) Development of a research approach for researching institutional capacity and requirements for guideline and DSS development: a concept note. Deliverable 4.2/4.3; Draft version 2; Date 11 November 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2004) Impacts of Europe’s changing climate: an indicator-based assessment. EEA Report No 2/2004, Copenhagen. URL: http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/climate_report_2_2004. Last Accessed 13 July 2012

  • Gaillard JC (2010) Vulnerability capacity and resilience: perspectives for climate and development policy. J Int Dev 22:218–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GWP – Global Water Partnership (2007) Climate change adaptation and integrated water resources management – an overview. Global Water Partnership, Technical Committee Policy Brief 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13:459–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helbron H (2008) Strategic environmental assessment in regional land use planning: indicator system for the assessment of degradation of natural resources and land uses with environmental potential for adaptation to global climate change (LUCCA). Doctoral Thesis at the Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Process Engineering at BTU Cottbus. http://opus.kobv.de/btu/volltexte/2008/584/. Last Accessed 13 July 2012

  • Hilderbrand ME, Grindle MS (1997) Building sustainable capacity in the public sector: what can be done? In: Grindle MS (ed) Getting good government: capacity building in the public sectors of developing countries. Harvard University Press, Harvard, pp 30–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper BP (2005) Integrated river basin governance—learning from international experience. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntjens P, Aekeraj S, Henocque Y (2009) State-of-the- art of (adaptive) IWRM programs/projects. Scorecard for ASEM Waternet Product of WP5 Water Governance

    Google Scholar 

  • Junk WJ (2002) Long-term environmental trends and the future of tropical wetlands. Environ Conservat 29(4):414–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon J (1984) Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublicationInfo?journalCode=admisciequar HarperCollins Publishers, New York, NY

  • Kuban R, MacKenzie-Carey H (2001) Community-wide vulnerability and capacity assessment (CVCA). Office of Critical Infrastructure Protection and Emergency, Preparedness, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Leknes E (2001) The roles of EIA in the decision-making process. Environ Impact Assess Rev 21:309–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom C (1959) The science of ‘muddling through. Public Admin Rev 19(2):79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March J, Olson J (1984) The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. Am Political Sci Rev 78:734–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miser H, Quade ES (ed) (1988) Handbook of systemsanalysis; craft issues and procedural choices. Wiley, ChichesterMizrahi Ye (2004) Capacity enhancement indicators. Review of the literature. WBI Working Papers. World Bank Morgan P (2003) Draft background paper on methodology DAC study on capacities, change and performance, ECDPM, June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan P (2006) The concept of capacity: capacity, change and performance. European Centre for Development Policy Management, Maastricht

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Towards sustainable development. Environmental indicators. Paris http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/37/1/33703867.pdf. Last Accessed 13 July 2012

  • OECD-DAC Network on Governance (2006) The challenge of capacity development: working towards good practice. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/4/36/36326495.pdf. Last Accessed 13 July 2012

  • Olsen SB (2003) Frameworks and indicators for assessing progress in integrated coastal management initiatives. Ocean Coastal Manag 46:347–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar Handbooks 1-16 (2007) Wise use of wetland. Ramsar convention secretariat. http://www.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-pubs-handbooks/main/ramsar/1-30-33_4000_0__. Last Accessed 13 July 2012

  • Simon HA (1960) Management by machines: how much and how Soon? Manag Rev 49(12–19):68–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M, Hulme D (1997) Governance administration and development. Kumarian Press, West Hartford

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon L, Driessen PPJ, Kolhoff AJ, Runhaar HAC (2010) An analytical framework for capacity development EIA—the case of Yemen. Environ Impact Assess Rev 30(2):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zsuffa I, Cools J, Vlieghe P, Debels P, van Griensven A, van Dam A, Hein T, Hattermann F, Masiyandima M, Cornejo MP, de Grunauer R, Kaggwa R and Baker C (2008) The WETwin project: enhancing the role of wetlands in integrated water resources management for Twinned River Basins in EU, Africa and South-America in support of EU water initiatives

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hendrike Clouting .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clouting, H., Douven, W., Ostrovskaya, E., Pataki, B., Schwartz, K. (2014). Framework for Analysing Institutional Capacity for Wetland Management: The Case of the Gemenc Floodplain. In: Albrecht, E., Schmidt, M., Mißler-Behr, M., Spyra, S. (eds) Implementing Adaptation Strategies by Legal, Economic and Planning Instruments on Climate Change. Environmental Protection in the European Union, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77614-7_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics