Advancing Forest-Related Adaptation: Options for Adaptation-Oriented REDD+

  • Andrew LongEmail author
Part of the Environmental Protection in the European Union book series (ENVPROTEC, volume 4)


The single most promising legal and political opportunity for simultaneously preserving tropical forests and combating climate change in the near future is the developing REDD+ mechanism (for summaries of REDD+ proposals see Parker et al. 2009). REDD+ has been understood primarily, if not exclusively, as a mitigation mechanism by most commentators because it has the potential to significantly reduce the nearly 20 % of global greenhouse gas emissions attributable to the forest and land use sector. However, as REDD+ becomes established, it will inevitably have a significant impact on adaptation in tropical forest regions. This impact will not necessarily be beneficial, but design choices made now—in the early stages of REDD+ development—can shape the mechanism to become a profoundly valuable instrument for advancing adaptation in tropical forest countries (for in-depth discussion see Long 2011; for a discussion focusing on biodiversity benefits see Long 2009). This chapter discusses the options for designing REDD+ to maximize adaptation benefit while retaining its mitigation value.


Ecosystem Service Tropical Forest Clean Development Mechanism Climate Regime Clean Development Mechanism Project 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Badiozamani G (2007) Addressing deforestation and forest degradation through international policy. In: Freer-Smith P, Broadmeadow M, Lynch J (eds) Forestry and climate change. CABI, Wallingford, pp 197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broadhead J, Durst P, Brown C (2009) Climate change: will it change how we manage forests? EFTRN News 50:57–65Google Scholar
  3. Bronsteen J, Buccafusco C, Masur J (2010) Well-being analysis. Georgetown Law J 98:1583–1642Google Scholar
  4. Butler RA, Laurance W (2008) New strategies for conserving tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 23:469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ebeling J, Yasue M (2008) Generating carbon finance through avoided deforestation and its potention to create climactic, conservation and human development benefits. Philos Trans R Soc 363:1920–1924Google Scholar
  6. Eliasch J (2008) Climate change: financing global forests. UK Office of Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  7. Food & Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (2009) State of the world’s forests 2009Google Scholar
  8. Glück P, Rayner J, Berghäll O, Braatz S, Robledo C, Wreford A (2009) Governance and policies for adaptation. In: Seppälä R, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Adaptation of forests and people to climate change: a global assessment report. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, pp 187–210Google Scholar
  9. Innes J, Joyce L, Kellomäki S, Louman B, Ogden A, Parrotta J, Thompson I, Ayres M, Ong C, Santoso H, Sohngen B, Wreford A (2009) Management for adaptation. In: Seppälä R, Buck A, Katila P (eds) Adaptation of forests and people to climate change: a global assessment report. International Union of Forest Research Organizations, Vienna, pp 135–186Google Scholar
  10. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis reportGoogle Scholar
  11. Karousakis K (2009) Promoting biodiversity co-benefits in REDD. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 11. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/220188577008Google Scholar
  12. Levin K, McDermott C, Cashore B (2008) The climate regime as global forest governance: can reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) initiatives pass a ‘dual effectiveness’ test? Int Forestry Rev 10(3):538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Long A (2011) Global climate governance to enhance biodiversity and well-being: integrating non-state networks and public international law in tropical forests. Environ Law 41:95–164Google Scholar
  14. Long A (2010) Tropical forest mitigation projects and sustainable development: designing U.S. law for a supportive role. William Mitchell Law Rev 36:101–124Google Scholar
  15. Long A (2009) Taking adaptation value seriously: designing REDD to protect biodiversity. Carbon Climate Law Rev 3:314–323Google Scholar
  16. Parker C, Mitchell A, Trivedi M, Mardas N (2009) The little REDD+ book: an up-dated guide to governmental and non-governmental proposals for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation. Global Canopy Program, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. Sangster M, Dudley M (2007) Governance and climate change. In: Freer-Smith P, Broadmeadow M, Lynch J (eds) Forestry and climate change. CABI, Wallingford, pp 214–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3Google Scholar
  19. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice (2005) Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action, submissions from parties. UN Doc. FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1Google Scholar
  21. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2008) Bali, Dec. 3–15, 2007, part two: action taken by the conference of the parties at its thirteenth session. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change—Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention (2009) Copenhagen, Dec. 7–15, 2009, Policy Approaches and Positive Incentives on Issues Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries; and the Role of Conservation, Sustainable Management of Forests and Enhancement of Forest Carbon Stocks in Developing Countries, Draft Decision (addendum). U.N. Doc. FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/L.7/Add.6Google Scholar
  23. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2010) Cancun, Nov. 29–Dec. 10, 2010, The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1Google Scholar
  24. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2011) Durban, Nov. 28–Dec. 9, 2011, Guidance on Systems for Providing Information on how Safeguards are Addressed and Respected and Modalities Relating to Forest Reference Emission Levels and Forest Reference Levels as Referred to in Decision. U.N. Doc. FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.2Google Scholar
  25. Vandenbergh M, Ackerly B, Forster F (2009) Micro-offsets and macro-transformation: an inconvenient view of climate change justice. Harvard Environ Law Rev 33:303–348Google Scholar
  26. Yamin F, Depledge J (2004) The international climate change regime: a guide to rules, institutions, and procedures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Coastal School of LawJacksonvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations