Skip to main content

Sellers Competing for Buyers in Online Markets

  • Conference paper
Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 2))

Abstract

We consider competition between sellers offering similar items in concurrent online auctions, where each seller must set its individual auction parameters (such as the reserve price) in such a way as to attract buyers. We show that there exists a pure Nash equilibrium in the case of two sellers with asymmetric production costs. In addition, we show that, rather than setting a reserve price, a seller can further improve its utility by shill bidding (i.e., pretending to be a buyer in order to bid in its own auction). But, using an evolutionary simulation, we show that this shill bidding introduces inefficiences within the market. However, we then go on to show that these inefficiences can be reduced when the mediating auction institution uses appropriate auction fees that deter sellers from submitting shill bids.

This is an abbreviated version. The complete paper is published as [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gerding, E.H., Rogers, A., Dash, R.K., Jennings, N.R.: Sellers competing for buyers in online markets: Reserve prices, shill bids, and auction fees. In: Proc. of 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India, pp. 1287–1293 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McAfee, R.P.: Mechanism design by competing sellers. Econometrica 61(6), 1281–1312 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Burguet, R., Sákovics, J.: Imperfect competition in auction design. International Economic Review 40(1), 231–247 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, W., Hidvégi, Z., Whinston, A.: Shill-proof fee (SPF) schedule: The sunscreen against seller self-collusion in online english auctions. Working Paper  (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Henner Gimpel Nicholas R. Jennings Gregory E. Kersten Axel Ockenfels Christof Weinhardt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gerding, E.H., Rogers, A., Dash, R.K., Jennings, N.R. (2008). Sellers Competing for Buyers in Online Markets. In: Gimpel, H., Jennings, N.R., Kersten, G.E., Ockenfels, A., Weinhardt, C. (eds) Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77554-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77554-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77553-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77554-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics