Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4435))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given an arbitrary intruder deduction capability, modeled as an inference system \({\cal S}\) and a protocol, we show how to compute an inference system \(\widehat{\cal S}\) such that the security problem for an unbounded number of sessions is equivalent to the deducibility of some message in \(\widehat{\cal S}\). Then, assuming that \(\cal S\) has some subformula property, we lift such a property to \(\widehat{S}\), thanks to a proof normalisation theorem. In general, for an unbounded number of sessions, this provides with a complete deduction strategy. In case of a bounded number of sessions, our theorem implies that the security problem is co-NP-complete. As an instance of our result we get a decision algorithm for the theory of blind-signatures, which, to our knowledge, was not known before.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bernat, V.: Théories de l’intrus pour la vérification de protocoles cryptographiques. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cervesato, I., Durgin, N., Lincoln, P., Mitchell, J., Scedrov, A.: A meta-notation for protocol analysis. In: Syverson, P. (ed.) 12-th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chevalier, Y., Kuester, R., Rusinowitch, M., Turuani, M.: An NP decision procedure for protocol insecurity with xor. In: Kolaitis [15]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chevalier, Y., Küsters, R., Rusinowitch, M., Turuani, M.: Deciding the security of protocols with Diffie-Hellman exponentiation and products in exponents. In: Pandya, P.K., Radhakrishnan, J. (eds.) FST TCS 2003: Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science. LNCS, vol. 2914, pp. 124–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, E., Jha, S., Marrero, W.: Using state space exploration and a natural deduction style message derivation engine to verify security protocols. In (PROCOMET). Proceedings of the IFIP Working Conference on Programming Concepts and Methods (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Comon-Lundh, H., Cortier, V.: Security properties: two agents are sufficient. Science of Computer Programming 50(1–3), 51–71 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Comon-Lundh, H., Delaune, S.: The finite variant property: How to get rid of some algebraic properties. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Comon-Lundh, H., Shmatikov, V.: Intruder deductions, constraint solving and insecurity decision in preence of exclusive or. In: Kolaitis [15]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cortier, V., Millen, J., Rueß, H.: Proving secrecy is easy enough. In: 14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, pp. 97–108. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cortier, V., Rusinowitch, M., Zalinescu, E.: A resolution strategy for verifying cryptographic protocols with cbc encryption and blind signatures. In (PPDP 2005). Proc. 7th ACM-SIGPLAN Int. Conf. on Principles and Practice of Declarative Programming, pp. 12–22. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denker, G., Millen, J., Rueß, H.: The CAPSL integrated protocol environment. Technical report, SRI International (October 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dershowitz, N., Jouannaud, J.-P.: Rewrite systems. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 243–309. North Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fabrega, F.T., Herzog, J., Guttman, J.: Strand spaces: Proving security protocol correct. Journal of Computer Security 7, 191–230 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujioka, A., Okamoto, T., Ohta, K.: A practical secret voting scheme for large scale elections. In: Proc. ASIACRYPT 1992. LNCS, vol. 718, pp. 244–251. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kolaitis, P. (ed.): Eighteenth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kremer, S., Ryan, M.: Analysis of an electronic voting protocol in the applied pi-calculus. In: Sagiv, M. (ed.) ESOP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3444, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. McAllester, D.: Automatic recognition of tractability in inference relations. J. ACM 40(2), 284–303 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rusinowitch, M., Turuani, M.: Protocol insecurity with finite number of sessions is NP-complete. In: Proc.14th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia (June 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shmatikov, V.: Decidable analysis of cryptographic protocols with products and modular exponentiation. In: Schmidt, D. (ed.) ESOP 2004. LNCS, vol. 2986, Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Security protocols open repository, http://www.lsv.ens-cachan.fr/spore/

  21. Turuani, M.: Sécurité des protocoles cryptographiques: décidabilité et complexité. PhD thesis, Université Henri Poincaré- Nancy 1 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mitsu Okada Ichiro Satoh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernat, V., Comon-Lundh, H. (2007). Normal Proofs in Intruder Theories. In: Okada, M., Satoh, I. (eds) Advances in Computer Science - ASIAN 2006. Secure Software and Related Issues. ASIAN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4435. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77505-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77505-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77504-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77505-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics