Skip to main content

Approaches to the Active Conceptual Modelling of Learning

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4512))

Abstract

Information modelling is a collection of dynamic processes, in which its content develops from physical processes to abstract knowledge structures. We study that collection on several levels of abstraction of human cognition and knowledge. These processes can be performed through various approaches, on several levels, and by using several perspectives. We concentrate on active conceptual modelling, which has become important in the science and technology, including educational sciences and learning. It is a process of recognition, finding or creating relevant concepts and conceptual models which describe the UoD, representing the conceptual content of information to be contained in the IS. This characterisation contains the construction of new concepts, too. We study methods for collecting information from various sources in the UoD and accumulating it as possibly actual instances of various types of pre-defined concepts. Some of these instances may be cases of sudden events or processes. They should be recognised as concepts and included in to the conceptual schema. To some extent, some concepts may be constructed which fit to this collected information. During the adaptation process we are applying active conceptual modelling for learning, which organises our conceptual schema in a new way. Learning is a process in which a learner re-organises, removes or refills his knowledge structures by applying his newly organised conceptual schema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van Griethuysen, J.J. (ed.) : Concepts and Terminology for the Conceptual Schema and the Information Base. ISO/TC97/SC5-N695, 1982, 1990, ISO Secreteriat, Geneve

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mesarovic, M.D., Macko, D., Takahara, Y.: Theory of Hierarchical, Multilevel Systems. Academic Press, London (1970)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nauta Jr., D.: The Meaning of Information. Mouton & Co., The Hague (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Senko, M.E., Altman, E.B., Astrahan, M.M., Fehde, P.L.: Data Structures and Accessing in Data Base Systems. I Evolution of Information Systems. II Information Organization. III Data Representation and the Data Independent Accessing Model. IBM System Journal 12(1), 30–93 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kangassalo, H.: A Stratified Description as a Framework of File Description. (Kerrostettu kuvaus tiedostojen kuvauksen kehysmallina). DIFO-vuosikirja 2/1973. DIFO-tutkimus ry, Tampere, pp. 47–62 (May 1973) (in Finish)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kangassalo, H.: Conceptual Structure of the File Design Problem: a General View. DIFOreport no 8. In: Bubenko Jr., J.A., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) Data Base Schema Design and Evaluation, p. 18, Røros, Norway (1975-02-27...28)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kangassalo, H.: Structuring Principles of Conceptual Schemas and Conceptual Models. In: Bubenko Jr., J.A. (eds.) Information Modelling, pp. 223–311, Studentlitteratur, Lund (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nauta Jr., D.: The Meaning of Information, p. 170. Mouton & Co., The Hague (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. FRISCO The IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO A Framework of Information System Concepts, p. 54 (December 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nauta Jr., D.: The Meaning of Information, p. 169. Mouton & Co., The Hague (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lacey, A.R.: A Dictionary of Philosophy. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (first published 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flavell, J.H., Miller, P.H., Miller, S.A.: Cognitive development, 3rd edn., p. 2. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (first ed. 1977) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bermúdez, J.: Nonconceptual Mental Content. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Online edition 2005-08-31

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd., London (First published 1958) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiig, K.M.: Knowledge Management Foundations: Thinking about Thinking, p. 11. Schema Press, Arlington, Texas (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kangassalo, H.: COMIC - A System and Methodology for Conceptual Modelling and Information Construction. Data & Knowledge Engineering 9, 287–319 (1992/1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guarino, N., Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and Knowledge Bases: Towards a Terminological Clarification. In: Mars, N.J.I. (ed.) Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in Information Systems, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bilgrami, A.: Rules. In: Honderich, T. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, p. 781. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pettit, P.: Problem of rule-following. In: Dancy, J., Sosa, E., (eds.) A Companion to Epistemology. Blackwell Companion to Philosophy. Blackwell Publishers, Inc., Oxford, UK (1996) (Rule-following using words requires that a language and appropriate words are available. See also Point 14. Norms)

    Google Scholar 

  22. White, J.: Inference. In: Honderich, T. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ruse, M.: Theory. In: Honderich, T. (ed.) The Oxford Companion to Philosophy, Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stegmüller, W.: The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. Springer, Berlin (1976)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Stegmüller, W.: The Structuralist View of Theories. A Possible Analogue of the Bourbaki Programme in Physical Science. Springer, Berlin (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Weitz, M.: Theories of Concepts. A History of the Major Philosophical Tradition. Roudledge, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. In: Semantics I: Sense and Reference, vol. 1, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Laurence, S., Margolis, E.: Concepts and Cognitive Science. In: Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.) Concepts - Core Readings, MIT Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Murphy, G.L.: The Big Book of Concepts. A Bradford Book. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bunge, M.: Characterises epistemology as follows: Epistemology, or the theory of knowledge, is the field of research concerned with human knowledge in general-ordinary and scientific, intuitive and formal, pure and action-oriented. And methodology-not to be mistaken for methodics, or a set methods or techniques-is the discipline that studies the principles of successful inquiry, whether in ordinary life, science, technology, or the humanities, Bunge M, Treatise of Basic Philosophy, vol. 5, p. xiv

    Google Scholar 

  31. Klausmaier, H.J.: Conceptualizing. In: Jones, B.F., Idol, L. (eds.) Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction, pp. 93–138. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palomäki, J.: From Concepts to Concept Theory. Discoveries, Connections, and Results. PhD Diss. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis. Ser. A, vol. 416, University of Tampere, Tampere (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moser, P.K.: Epistemology. In: Audi, R. (General Editor): The Cambridge Dictionary Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Medin, D.L., Goldstone, R.L.: Concepts. In: Eysenck, M.W. (ed.) The Blackwell Dictionary of Cognitive Psychology, pp. 77–83. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Margolis, E., Laurence, S. (eds.): Concepts - Core Readings. MIT Press, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelly, G.H.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, Two volumes (1955)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Thagard, P.: Conceptual Revolutions, pp. 34–39. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  38. We will assume that ontology is a conceptual system, in which all concepts are basic or primitive concepts, from which all other, more advanced concepts can be constructed. A concept is a basic or primitive concept, if it does not contain any concepts contained into it

    Google Scholar 

  39. Kangassalo, H.: Dynamics of a Conceptual Schema and its Description. Department of Computer Sciences, University of Tampere (2007-01-09) (under preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kauppi, R.: Einführung in die Theorie der Begriffssysteme. In: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis, Ser. A, vol.15, Universität Tampere, Tampere (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kangassalo, H.: Frameworks of Information Modelling: Construction of Concepts and Knowledge by Using the Intensional Approach. In: Brinkkemper, J., Lindengrona, E., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering. State of the Arts and Research Themes, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., McClelland, J.L.: A General Framework for Parallel Distributed Processing and The PDP Research Group. In: Parallel Distributed Prosessing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol. 1, ch. 2, A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts (1988) (Eigth printing)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hinton, G.E., McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E.: Distributed Representations. In: Rumelhart, D.E., et al. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Prosessing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vol. 1: Foundations, ch. 3 (see above)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L.: PDP Models and General Issues in Cognitive Science. In: Rumelhart, D.E., et al. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Prosessing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vol. 1: Foundations, ch. 4 (see above)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Smolensky, P.: Information Processing in Dynamical Systems: Foundations of Harmony Theory. In: Rumelhart, D.E., et al. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Prosessing. Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. vol. 1: Foundations, ch. 6 (see above)

    Google Scholar 

  46. It would be natural to assume, that also on higher levels the constructs are connectionistic constructs, but representations of them would be complex and large. We simplify representations and say that they are constructed from concepts and relationships typical to each respective level. We assume that they can be reduced to connectionistic constructs

    Google Scholar 

  47. Medin, D.L., Lynch, E.B., Solomon, K.O.: Are There Kinds of Concepts? Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51, 121–147 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Millikan, R.G.: A Common Structure for Concepts of Individuals, Stuffs, and Real Kinds: More Mama, More Milk and More Mouse. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22(1), 55–65 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Masolo, C., Borgo, S., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Oltramari, A.: WonderWeb Deliverable D18. Ontology Library (final). Laboratory For Applied Ontology- ISTC-CNR, Trento, Italy (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Chisholm, R.M.: A Realistic Theory of Categogies-An Essay on Ontology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals. Comm. of the ACM 26(11) (November 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kangassalo, H.: On the Concept of Concept for Conceptual Modelling and Concept Detection. In: Ohsuga, S., Kangassalo, H., Jaakkola, H., et al. (eds.) Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases III, pp. 17–58. IOS, Amsterdam (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Emerging Technologies: Learning Theories (2007-05-17) http://www.emtech.net/learning_theories.htm

  54. Landy, D., Goldstone, R.L.: How we learn about things we don’t already understand. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 17(4), 343–369 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Novak, J.D., Cañas, A.J.: Building on New Contructivist Ideas and Cmap Tools to Crate a New Model for Education. In: Cañas, A.J., Novak, J.D., González, F.M. (eds) Concept maps: Theory, methodology technology. Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Concept Mapping. Universidad Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bunge, M.: Treatise on Basic Philosophy. In: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World, vol. 6, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Peter P. Chen Leah Y. Wong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kangassalo, H. (2007). Approaches to the Active Conceptual Modelling of Learning. In: Chen, P.P., Wong, L.Y. (eds) Active Conceptual Modeling of Learning. ACM-L 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4512. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77503-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77503-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77502-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77503-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics