Skip to main content

Using Modified Contour Deformable Model to Quantitatively Estimate Ultrasound Parameters for Osteoporosis Assessment

  • Conference paper
  • 1130 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 4901))

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disease, which is characterized by low bone mass and micro-architectural deterioration of bone tissue, leading to bone fragility. Finding an effective method for prevention and early diagnosis of the disease is very important. Several parameters, including broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS), and stiffness index (STI), have been used to measure the characteristics of bone tissues. In this paper, we proposed a method, namely modified contour deformable model (MCDM), bases on the active contour model (ACM) and active shape model (ASM) for automatically detecting the calcaneus contour from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parametric images. The results show that the difference between the contours detected by the MCDM and the true boundary for the phantom is less than one pixel. By comparing the phantom ROIs, significant relationship was found between contour mean and bone mineral density (BMD) with R=0.99. The influence of selecting different ROI diameters (12, 14, 16 and 18 mm) and different region-selecting methods, including fixed region (ROI fix ), automatic circular region (ROI cir ) and calcaneal contour region (ROI anat ), were evaluated for testing human subjects. Measurements with large ROI diameters, especially using fixed region, result in high position errors (10-45%). The precision errors of the measured ultrasonic parameters for ROI anat are smaller than ROI fix and ROI cir . In conclusion, ROI anat provides more accurate measurement of ultrasonic parameters for the evaluation of osteoporosis and is useful for clinical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Evans, J.A., Tavakoli, M.B.: Ultrasonic attenuation and velocity in bone. Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1387–1396 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Serpe, L., Rho, J.Y.: The nonlinear transition period of broadband ultrasound attenuation as bone density veries. J. Biomechanics 29, 963–966 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Njeh, C.F., Saeed, I., Grigorian, M., Kendler, D.L., Fan, B., Shepherd, J., Mcclung, M., Drake, W.M., Genant, H.K.: Assessment of bone status using speed of sound at multiple anatomical sites. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 27, 1337–1345 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toyras, J., Nieminen, M.T., Kroger, H., Jurvelin, J.S.: Bone mineral density, ultrasound velocity, and broadband attenuation predict mechanical predict mechanical properties of trabecular bone differently. Bone 31, 503–507 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. UBIS 5000 Technical Manual (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Han, S., Medige, J., Ziv, I.: Combined models of ultrasound velocity and attenuation for predicting trabecular bone strength and mineral density. Clinical Biomechanics 11, 348–353 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hadji, P., Hars, O., Wuster, C., Bock, K., Alberts, U.S., Bohnet, H.G., Emons, G., Schulz, K.D.: Stiffness index identifies patients with osteoporotic fractures better than ultrasound velocity or attenuation alone. Maturitas 31, 221–226 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lefebvre, F., Berger, G., Laugier, P.: Automatic detection of the calcaneus boundary from ultrasound parametric images using active contour model: Clinical assessment. IEEE. Trans. Med. Imaging 17, 45–52 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., Graham, J.: Active shape models- their training and application. CVGIP: Image Understanding 61, 38–59 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: Active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 321–331 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Njeh, C.F., Boivin, C.M., Langton, C.M.: The Role of Ultrasound in the Assessment of Osteoporosis: A Review. Osteoporosis Int. 7, 7–22 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van der Bergh, J.P.W., Noordam, C., Thijssen, J.M., Otten, B.J., Smals, A.G.H., Hermus, A.R.M.M.: Measuring skeletal changes with calcaneus ultrasound imaging in healthy children and adults: The influence of size and location of the region of interest. Osteoporos Int. 12, 970–979 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lobregt, S., Viergever, M.A.: A discrete dynamic contour model. IEEE. Trans. Med. Imaging 14, 12–24 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fournier, B., Chappard, C., Roux, C., Berger, G., Laugier, P.: Quantitative ultrasound imaging at the calcaneus using an automatic region of interest. Osteoporos Int. 7, 363–369 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, YF., Du, YC., Tsai, YT., Chen, T. (2007). Using Modified Contour Deformable Model to Quantitatively Estimate Ultrasound Parameters for Osteoporosis Assessment. In: Zhang, D. (eds) Medical Biometrics. ICMB 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4901. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77413-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77413-6_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77410-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77413-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics