Abstract
Bridging problem domain and solution in product line engineering is a time-consuming and error-prone process. Since both domains are structured differently (features vs. artifacts), there is no natural way to map one to the other. Using an explicit and formal mapping creates opportunities for consistency checking and automation. This way both the configuration and the composition of product instances can be more robust, support more product variants and be performed more often.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Batory, D., Benavides, D., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Automated analyses of feature models: Challenges ahead. Communications of the ACM (to appear, December 2006)
Batory, D., Sarvela, J.N., Rauschmayer, A.: Scaling step-wise refinement. In: ICSE 2003. Proceedings of the 25th International Conf. on Software Engineering, Piscataway, NJ, may 3–10, 2003, pp. 187–197. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2003)
Benavides, D., MartÃn-Arroyo, P.T., Cortés, A.R.: Automated reasoning on feature models. In: Pastor, Ó., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 491–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Bontemps, Y., Heymans, P., Schobbens, P.-Y., Trigaux, J.-C.: Semantics of feature diagrams. In: Tomi, M., Bosch, J. (eds.) Proc. of Workshop on Software Variability Management for Product Derivation (Towards Tool Support), Boston (August 2004)
Bryant, R.E.: Symbolic Boolean manipulation with ordered binary-decision diagrams. ACM Computing Surveys 24(3), 293–318 (1992)
Cao, F., Bryant, B.R., Burt, C.C., Huang, Z., Raje, R.R., Olson, A.M., Auguston, M.: Automating feature-oriented domain analysis. In: SERP 2003. Proc. of the International Conf. on Software Engineering Research and Practice (2003)
Czarnecki, K., Antkiewicz, M.: Mapping features to models: A template approach based on superimposed variants. In: Glück, R., Lowry, M. (eds.) GPCE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3676, pp. 422–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
de Jonge, M.: Source tree composition. In: Gacek, C. (ed.) Software Reuse: Methods, Techniques, and Tools. LNCS, vol. 2319, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
de Jonge, M., Visser, J.: Grammars as feature diagrams. draft (April 2002)
Fowler, M.: Inversion of control containers and the dependency injection pattern. Online (February 2006), http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/injection.html
Groote, J.F., van de Pol, J.C.: Equational binary decision diagrams. Technical Report SEN-R0006, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), Amsterdam (2000)
Jansen, A.: Feature based composition. Master’s thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groning (2002)
Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, A.: Feature-oriented domain analysis (FODA) feasibility study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, SEI, CMU, Pittsburgh, PA (November 1990)
Kiczales, G., Hilsdale, E., Hugunin, J., Kersten, M., Palm, J., Griswold, W.G.: An overview of aspectj. In: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, pp. 327–353. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Klint, P., van der Storm, T.: Reflections on feature-oriented software engineering. In: Schwanninger, C. (ed.) OOPSLA 2004. Workshop on Managing Variabilities Consistently in Design and Code held at the 19th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, ACM Press, New York (2004), Available from http://www.cwi.nl/~storm
Mannion, M.: Using first-order logic for product line model validation. In: Chastek, G.J. (ed.) Software Product Lines. LNCS, vol. 2379, pp. 176–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Prehofer, C.: Feature-oriented programming: A fresh look at objects. In: Aksit, M., Matsuoka, S. (eds.) ECOOP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1241, pp. 419–443. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Eric, S.: Raymond. The CML2 language. In: 9th International Python Conference (accessed October 2006), Available at http://www.catb.org/~esr/cml2/cml2-paper.html
van der Storm, T.: Variability and component composition. In: Bosch, J., Krueger, C. (eds.) ICOIN 2004 and ICSR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3107, pp. 86–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
van Deursen, A., Klint, P.: Domain-specific language design requires feature descriptions. Journal of Computing and Information Technology 10(1), 1–18 (2002)
van Gurp, J., Bosch, J., Svahnberg, M.: On the Notion of Variability in Software Product Lines. In: WICSA 2001. Proceedings of the Working IEEE/IFIP Conf. on Software Architecture (2001)
van Ommering, R., Bosch, J.: Widening the scope of software product lines: from variation to composition. In: Chastek, G. (ed.) Software Product Lines. LNCS, vol. 2379, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
van der Storm, T. (2007). Generic Feature-Based Software Composition. In: Lumpe, M., Vanderperren, W. (eds) Software Composition. SC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77351-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77351-1_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77350-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77351-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)