Skip to main content

Looking for Unexpected Consequences of Interface Design Decisions: The MeMo Workbench

  • Conference paper
Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design (TAMODIA 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4849))

Abstract

This paper discusses and illustrates work in progress on the MeMo workbench for early model-based usability evaluation of interface designs. Characteristic features of the workbench include (a) the prediction of errors via rules that refer to user attributes; and (b) the automatic generation of methods for performing specific tasks and for recovering from errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Möller, S., Englert, R., Engelbrecht, K., Hafner, V., Jameson, A., Oulasvirta, A., Raake, A., Reithinger, N.: MeMo: Towards automatic usability evaluation of spoken dialogue services by user error simulations. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH 2006. the Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, D.A.: Design rules based on analyses of human error. Communications of the ACM 26, 254–258 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. John, B.E., Salvucci, D.: Multipurpose prototypes for assessing user interfaces in pervasive computing systems. pervasive computing 4(4), 27–34 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reason, J.: Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wood, S.D., Kieras, D.E.: Modeling human error for experimentation, training, and error-tolerant design. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, Orlando, FL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paternò, F., Santoro, C.: Preventing user errors by systematic analysis of deviations from the system task model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 56(2), 225–245 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baber, C., Stanton, N.A.: Task analysis for error identification. In: Diaper, D., Stanton, N. (eds.) The Handbook of Task Analysis for Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 367–379. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bastide, R., Basnyat, S.: Error patterns: Systematic investigation of deviations in task models. In: Coninx, K., Luyten, K., Schneider, K.A. (eds.) Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design, pp. 109–121. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marco Winckler Hilary Johnson Philippe Palanque

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jameson, A., Mahr, A., Kruppa, M., Rieger, A., Schleicher, R. (2007). Looking for Unexpected Consequences of Interface Design Decisions: The MeMo Workbench. In: Winckler, M., Johnson, H., Palanque, P. (eds) Task Models and Diagrams for User Interface Design. TAMODIA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4849. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77222-4_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77222-4_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77221-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77222-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics