Skip to main content

Road Pricing in Europe — A Review of Research and Practice

  • Chapter
Road Pricing, the Economy and the Environment

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

Abstract

Despite the considerable benefits of road pricing that economists and other analysts have shown, and despite the efforts of the EU to get road pricing implemented, it has not been implemented on a broad scale. It is still widely considered to be a radical and controversial policy. This chapter provides a comprehensive review of experiences with road pricing in Europe and elsewhere. We consider pricing issues in urban road and interurban road transport separately. The policies in the two areas have typically been different focusing in urban transport on the private car and in interurban on freight transport. Also existing analyses, both theoretical and conceptual and those using real-world simulation models, have mostly dealt with these two topics separately. For both areas we consider the current pricing schemes, barriers to pricing and likely next steps. A central theme arising from this chapter is the importance of institutional implementation issues, including political acceptability. These questions have been given too little attention both in research and in actual attempts to implement road-pricing measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AFFORD. http://www.staresearch.fi/final-report1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott, R., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R. (1993). A structural model of peak-period congestion: A traffic bottleneck with elastic demand. American Economic Review, 83(1): 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, J., Polak, J., Jones, P., Cook, A. (2001). The valuation of reliability for personal travel. Transportation Research E, 37: 191–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall, P., Shires, J. Matthews, B., Maule, J., Beale, J. (2004). Road User Charging — Pricing Structures, Draft Final Report for the Department for Transport, July, University of Leeds: The Institute for Transport Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownstone, D., Ghosh, A., Golob, T.F., Kazimi, C., Van Amelsfort, D. (2003). Drivers’ willingness to pay to reduce travel time: evidence from the San Diego I-15 congestion pricing project. Transportation Research A, 37A: 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAPRI. http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/capri/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1995). Towards Fair and Efficient Pricing in Transport-Policy Options for Internalising the Eexternal Costs of Transports in the European Union. Green Paper, COM(95) 691 European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (1998). Fair Payment for Infrastructure Use: A Phased Approach to a Common Transport Infrastructure Charging Framework in the EU. White Paper, COM(98) 466 European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2001). European Transport Policy to 2010: Time to Decide. White Paper, COM(01) 370 European Commission, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2003). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 1999/62/EC on the Charging of Heavy Goods Vehicles for the Use of Certain Infrastructures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, X. (1999). Alternative congestion pricing schedules. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29: 697–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Palma, A., Kilani, K., Lindsey, R., Moilanen, P., Proost, S., Sen, A., Vold, A., Niskanen, E. (2004). Welfare Effects — Urban Transport. MC-ICAM Deliverable 7. Project MC-ICAM. http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/mcicam/

    Google Scholar 

  • De Palma, A., Quinet, E. (eds.) (2005). La tarification des transports. Pourquoi? Pour Qui? Les defis d’aujourd’hui et de demain. Economica, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • DESIRE. http://www.tis.pt/proj/desire.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • EXTERN-E. http://www.externe.info/

    Google Scholar 

  • Faulhaber, G.R., Baumol, W.J. (1988). Economists as innovators: Practical products of theoretical research. Journal of Economic Literature, 26(2): 577–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (2003). Why are efficient transport policy instruments so seldom used? In Schade, J., Schlag, B. (eds.). Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Elsevier, North-Holland: 63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A. (2003). How to make unpopular policies popular after adoption. Paper presented at the third IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar, Leuven, May 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMPRINT-EUROPE. http://www.imprint-eu.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, T.C., Small, K.A. (2001). The value of time and reliability: measurement from a value pricing experiment. Transportation Research E, 37: 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, T., Schrank, D., Turner, S. Margiotta, R. (2003). Selecting travel reliability measures. http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/resources.stm (Accessed April 1, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • MC-ICAM. http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/mcicam/

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, D., Niskanen, E., Verhoef, E. (2001). AFFORD Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, C.A., Matthews, B. (2001). Why reform transport prices? Paper presented at the first IMPRINT-EUROPE Seminar, Brussels, 21–22 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, E., de Palma, A., Lindsey, R., Marler, N., May, T., Nash, C., Schade, J., Schlag, B., Verhoef, E. (2003). Pricing of Urban and Interurban Road Transport: Barriers, Constraints and Implementation Paths. MC-ICAM Deliverable 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, E., Nash, C. (2004). MC-ICAM Final Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • PETS. http://www.cordis.lu/transport/src/pets.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • PROGRESS. http://www.progress-project.org/

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinet, E. (1997). Full social cost of transportation in Europe. In: Greene, D.L., Jones, D.W., Delucchi, M.A. (eds.). The Full Costs and Benefits of Transportation. Springer, Berlin: 69–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinet, E. (2001). European pricing doctrines and the EU reform. Paper presented at the first IMPRINT-EUROPE Seminar, Brussels, 21–22 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramjerdi, F., Minken, H., Ostmoe, K. (2004). Norwegian urban tolls. In: Santos, G. (ed.), Road Pricing: Theory and Evidence, Research in Transportation Economics 9, Elsevier Science, 237–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • RECORDIT. http://www.recordit.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, A., Fagiani, P. (2003). Identifying Mode-specific Issues for Pricing Reform. TIPP Deliverable 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, D., Lomax, T. (1999). The 1999 Annual Mobility Report Information for Urban America, Texas Transportation Institute. Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas http://mobility.tamu.edu

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrank, D., Lomax, T. (2004). The 2004 Annual Mobility Report, Texas Transportation Institute. Texas A&M University System, College Station, Texas http://mobility.tamu.edu

    Google Scholar 

  • Schade, J. Schlag, B. (eds.) (2003). Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, K.A. (1992). Urban Transportation Economics. In: Lesourne, J., Sonnenschein, H. (eds.). Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics. Harwood Academic Publishers, Chur, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, K.A., Noland, R.B., Koskenoja, P.M. (1995). Socio-economic Attitudes and Impacts of Travel Reliability: A Stated Preference Approach. PATH Report, MOU-117, California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways.

    Google Scholar 

  • TIPP. http://www.strafica.fi/tipp/

    Google Scholar 

  • TRENEN. http://www.cordis.lu/transport/src/trenen1.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • UNITE. http://www.its.leeds.ac.uk/projects/unite/index.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegas, J. (2002). Tolling Heavy Goods Vehicles on European Roads: From a Diverse Set of Solutions to Interoperability? Paper presented at the second IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar, 14–15 May 2002, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W.S. (1969). Congestion theory and transport investment. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 59(2): 251–260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Niskanen, E., Nash, C. (2008). Road Pricing in Europe — A Review of Research and Practice. In: Jensen-Butler, C., Sloth, B., Larsen, M.M., Madsen, B., Nielsen, O.A. (eds) Road Pricing, the Economy and the Environment. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77150-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics