Skip to main content

An Examination of the Influence of Involvement Level of Web Site Users on the Perceived Credibility of Web Sites

  • Conference paper
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4744))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This study examined how Web site user involvement affects perceived credibility of Web sites. The study determined the relationship between two variables: enduring involvement and situational involvement and the study measured the effect of these two independent variables and the interaction effects on the perceived credibility of Web sites. A supplemental analysis assessed whether the four groups produced by the factorial design varied with regard to the Web site element categories noticed during credibility evaluation. The research found that the interaction effect between enduring involvement and situational involvement significantly influenced perceived credibility. Additionally, the user’s focus shifted to a more central focus when situational involvement was introduced and different Web site elements were noticed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., Cocking, R.R. (eds.): How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. National Academy Press, Washington, DC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caine, R.N., Caine, G.: Brain/mind learning (2003) (retrieved February 2, 2003), from http://cainelearning.com/brain

  3. Celsi, R., Olson, J.: The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 210–224 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cho, C.H.: How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 21(1), 33–50 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins, J.: Measuring credibility assessment targets in web-based information Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Nova Southeastern University, Florida (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dutta-Bergman, M.J.: The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication 54, 253–269 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fogg, B.J.: Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. In: CHI 2003 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 722–723. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fogg, B.J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., Paul, J., Rangnekar, A., Shon, J., Swani, P., Treinen, M.: What makes a web site credible? A report on a large quantitative study. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2001 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 61–68. ACM Press, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D., Marable, L., Stanford, J., Tauber, E.R.: How do people evaluate a web site’s credibility: Results from a large study. Consumer WebWatch Research. Retrieved from (October 15, 2003) (2003), http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/stanfordPTL_abstract.htm

  10. Fogg, B.J., Tseng, H.: The elements of computer credibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: The CHI is the Limit, pp. 80–87 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hawkins, S.A., Hoch, S.J.: Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research 19, 212–225 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Houston, M.J., Rothschild, M.L.: Conceptual and methodological perspectives on involvement. In: Jain, S.C. (ed.) Research frontiers in marketing: Dialogues and directions, pp. 184–187. American Marketing Association, Chicago (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hovland, C.I., Weiss, W.: The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 4(15), 635 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarvenpaa, S., Tractinsky, N., Saarinen, L.: Consumer trust in an internet store: A cross-cultural validation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 5(2) (1999) (retrieved on May 1, 2005), from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue2/jarvenpaa.html

  15. Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K.: Cruising is believing? Comparing internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 75, 325–340 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McKnight, H.D., Choudhury, V., Kacmar, C.: Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13(3), 334–359 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mittal, B.: A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement. Psychology and Marketing 12(7), 663–682 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1915–1926 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rieh, S.Y.: Judgement of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Sciences and Technology 53(2), 145–161 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schweiger, W.: Media credibility - experience or image?: A survey on the credibility of the World Wide Web in Germany in comparison to other media. European Journal of Communication 15(1), 37–59 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Self, C.C.: Credibility. In: Salwen, M.B., Stacks, D.W. (eds.) An integrated approach to communication theory and research, pp. 421–441. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sternthal, B., Phillips, L., Dholakia, R.: The persuasive effect of source credibility: A situational analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 42(Fall), 285–314 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trochim, W.: The research methods knowledge base. Cornell Custom Publishing, Cornell University, Ithaca (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wathan, C.N., Burkell, J.: Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(2), 134–144 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zaichkowsky, J.L.: Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research 12, 341–352 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Yvonne de Kort Wijnand IJsselsteijn Cees Midden Berry Eggen B. J. Fogg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferebee, S. (2007). An Examination of the Influence of Involvement Level of Web Site Users on the Perceived Credibility of Web Sites. In: de Kort, Y., IJsselsteijn, W., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4744. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77006-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-77005-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-77006-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics