Skip to main content

An Evolutionary Benefit from Misperception in Foraging Behaviour

  • Conference paper
Progress in Artificial Life (ACAL 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4828))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Misperception is a common cause of error for individuals and organisations. Conventional wisdom suggests that its effects are detrimental to the misperceiver or its society as a whole. However, in some circumstances misperception can provide a benefit either by diversifying the behaviour of a population or by discouraging behaviour that has a negative impact on the population. In such cases adaptive pressures will drive the population to evolve a probability of misperception that is optimal for that environment. We explore this hypothesis using an evolutionary artificial life simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brumley, L., Kopp, C., Korb, K.: Causes and effects of perception errors. Journal of Information Warfare 5(3), 41–53 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kopp, C., Mills, B.: Information Warfare and Evolution. In: Hutchinson, W. (ed.) IWAR 2002. Proceedings of the 3rd Australian Information Warfare & Security Conference 2002, pp. 352–360 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall, Englewod Cliffs, New Jersey (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Neisser, U.: Cognition and Reality. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, J.R.: The essence of winning and losing. Slideshow (January 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Doran, J.: Simulating collective misbelief. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 1(1) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Akaishi, J., Arita, T.: Misperception, communication and diversity. In: Standish, R.K., Bedau, M.A., Abbass, H.A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Life, pp. 350–357 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akaishi, J., Arita, T.: Multi-agent simulation showing adaptive property of misperception. In: FIRA Robot World Congress, pp. 74–79 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Abramson, D., Sosic, R., Giddy, J., Hall, B.: Nimrod: A tool for performing parameterised simulations using distributed workstations. In: 4th IEEE Symposium on High Performance Distributed Computing, pp. 112–121. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Marcus Randall Hussein A. Abbass Janet Wiles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brumley, L., Korb, K.B., Kopp, C. (2007). An Evolutionary Benefit from Misperception in Foraging Behaviour. In: Randall, M., Abbass, H.A., Wiles, J. (eds) Progress in Artificial Life. ACAL 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4828. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76931-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76931-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76930-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76931-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics