Skip to main content

Safe State Abstraction and Reusable Continuing Subtasks in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning

  • Conference paper
Book cover AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4830))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Hierarchical reinforcement learning methods have not been able to simultaneously abstract and reuse subtasks with discounted value functions. The contribution of this paper is to introduce two completion functions that jointly decompose the value function hierarchically to solve this problem. The significance of this result is that the benefits of hierarchical reinforcement learning can be extended to discounted value functions and to continuing (infinite horizon) reinforcement learning problems. This paper demonstrates the method with the an algorithm that discovers subtasks automatically. An example is given where the optimum policy requires a subtask never to terminate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parr, R.E.: Hierarchical Control and learning for Markov decision processes. PhD thesis, University of California at Berkeley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Precup, D.: Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning. PhD thesis, Univeristy of Massachusetts, Amherst (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dietterich, T.G.: Hierarchical reinforcement learning with the MAXQ value function decomposition. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 13, 227–303 (2000)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dean, T., Givan, R.: Model minimization in markov decision processes. In: AAAI / IAAI, pp. 106–111 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dayan, P., Hinton, G.E.: Feudal reinforcement learning. In: NIPS. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 5 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaelbling, L.P.: Hierarchical learning in stochastic domains: Preliminary results. In: Machine Learning Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, pp. 167–173. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hengst, B.: Discovering Hierarchy in Reinforcement Learning. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Mehmet A. Orgun John Thornton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hengst, B. (2007). Safe State Abstraction and Reusable Continuing Subtasks in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds) AI 2007: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4830. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76928-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76926-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76928-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics