Skip to main content

Geographic Information Retrieval by Topological, Geographical, and Conceptual Matching

  • Conference paper
GeoSpatial Semantics (GeoS 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4853))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Geographic Information Science community is recognized that modern Geographic Information Retrieval systems should support the processing of imprecise data distributed over heterogeneous repositories. This means the search for relevant geographic results for a geographic query (Q G ) even if the data sources do not contain a result that matches exactly the user’s request and then approximated results would be useful. Therefore, GIR systems should be centred at the nature and essence of spatial data (their relations and properties) taken into consideration the user’s profile. Usually, semantic features are implicitly presented in different data sources. In this work, we use three heterogeneous data sources: vector data, geographic ontology, and geographic dictionaries. These repositories usually store topological relations, concepts, and descriptions of geographical objects under certain scenarios. In contrast to previous work, where these layers have been treated in an isolated way, their integration expects to be a better solution to capture the semantics of spatial objects. Thus, the use of spatial semantics and the integration of different information layers improve GIR, because adequate retrieval parameters according to the nature of spatial data, which emulate the user’s requirements, can be established. In particular, we use topological relations {inside, in}, semantic relations {hyperonimy, meronimy}, and descriptions {constraints, representation}. An information extraction mechanism is designed for each data source, while the integration process is performed using the algorithm of ontology exploration. The ranking process is based on similarity measures, using the previously developed confusion theory. Finally, we present a case study to show some results of integrated GIR (iGIR) and compare them with Google’s ones in a tabular form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Levachkine, S., Guzman-Arenas, A.: Hierarchy as a New Data Type for Qualitative Variables. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal 32(3), 899–910 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gazetteer Development at the Alexandria Digital Library Project. available at: http://www.alexandria.ucsb.edu/gazetteer

  3. Walker, A.R., Pham, B., Moody, M.: Spatial Bayesian Learning Algorithms for Geographic Information Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems, GIS 2005, 42, Bremen, Germany (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clough, P.: Extracting Metadata for Spatially-Aware Information Retrieval on the Internet. In: GIR 2005. Proceedings of the Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, Bremen Germany, pp. 25–30. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Egenhofer, M.: Interaction with Geographic Information Systems via Spatial Queries. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 1(4), 389–413 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Delboni, T.M., Borges, K.A., Laender, A.H., Davis, C.A.: Semantic Expansion of Geographic Web Queries Based on Natural Language Positioning Expressions. Transactions in GIS 11(3), 377–397 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Maedche, A., Staab, S., Stojanovic, N., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: SEAL A Framework for Developing Semantic Web Portals. In: Read, B. (ed.) Advances in Databases. LNCS, vol. 2097, Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Arpinar, I.B., Sheth, A., Ramakrishnan, C., Usery, L., Azami, M., Kwan, M.: Geospatial Ontology Development and Semantic Analytics. Transactions in GIS 10(4), 551–576 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinzle, F., Kcopczynsky, M., Sester, M.: Spatial Data Interpretations for the Intelligent Access to Spatial Information in the Internet. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, South Africa (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shilder, F., Versley, Y., Habel, C.: Extracting Spatial Information: rounding, Classifying and Linking Spatial Expressions. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, Sheffield, UK (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Egenhofer, M., Franzosa, R.: Point-Set Topological Spatial Relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 5(2), 161–174 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: Proceeding of FOIS 1998, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–15. IOS press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gruber, R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harding, J.: Geo-ontology Concepts and Issues, Report of a workshop on Geo-ontology, Ilkley UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond, B., Sheth, A., Kochut, K.: Semantic Enhancement Engine: A Modular Document Enhancement Platform for Semantic Applications over Heterogeneous Content. In: Kashyap, V., Shklar, L. (eds.) Real World Semantic Web Applications, pp. 29–49. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koo, S., Lim, S., Lee, S.: Building ontology based on hub words for information retrieval. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 466 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baeza-Yates, R., Ribeiro-Neto, B.: Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jones, C.-B., Abdelmoty, A.-I., Finch, D., Fu, G., Vaid, S.: The Spirit Spatial Search Engine: Architecture, Ontologies and Spatial Indexing. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference, Maryland, USA. LNCS, vol. 3234, pp. 125–139. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buscaldi, D., Rosso, P., García, P.: Inferring geographical ontologies from multiple resources for geographical information retrieval. In: Proceedings of 3erd Int. SIGIR Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, SIGIR, Seattle, pp. 52–55. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martins, B., Silva, M.J., Silveira, M.: Challenges and Resources for Evaluating Geographical IR. In: Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval, pp. 65–69. ACM Press, New York (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Martinez, M.: Topologic Descriptor for Topographic Maps, Master of Science Thesis, Mexico, PIIG Lab, Centre for Computing Research, in Spanish (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wordnet: A Lexical Database for the English Language. available at http://www.wordnet.com

  23. Martins, B., Silva, M., Freitas, S., Afonso, A.: Handling, Locations in Search Engine Queries. In: Proceedings of GIR 2006, the 3erd Workshop on Geographic Information Retrieval (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mata, F., Levachkine, S.: Semantics of Proximity in Locative Expressions. In: Rodríguez, M.A., Cruz, I., Levashkin, S., Egenhofer, M.J. (eds.) GeoS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3799, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yee, W.G., Beigbeder, M., Buntine, W.: SIGIR06 Workshop Report: Open Source Information Retrieval systems (OSIR06). SIGIR Forum 40(2), 61–65 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petras, V., Fredric, C.G., Larson, R.: Domain-Specific CLIR of English, German and Russian Using Fusion and Subject Metadata for Query Expansion. In: Peters, C., Gey, F.C., Gonzalo, J., Müller, H., Jones, G.J.F., Kluck, M., Magnini, B., de Rijke, M., Giampiccolo, D. (eds.) CLEF 2005. LNCS, vol. 4022, pp. 226–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Cardoso, N., Martins, B., Chaves M., Andrade, L., Silva, M.: The XLDB group at GeoCLEF 2005. In: GeoCLEF 2005 Workshop, Poster Session (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Frederico Fonseca M. Andrea Rodríguez Sergei Levashkin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mata, F. (2007). Geographic Information Retrieval by Topological, Geographical, and Conceptual Matching. In: Fonseca, F., Rodríguez, M.A., Levashkin, S. (eds) GeoSpatial Semantics. GeoS 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4853. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76876-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76876-0_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76875-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76876-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics