Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4803))

Abstract

The degree of flexibility of workflow management systems heavily influences the way business processes are executed. Constraint-based models are considered to be more flexible than traditional models because of their semantics: everything that does not violate constraints is allowed. Although constraint-based models are flexible, changes to process definitions might be needed to comply with evolving business domains and exceptional situations. Flexibility can be increased by run-time support for dynamic changes – transferring instances to a new model – and ad-hoc changes – changing the process definition for one instance. In this paper we propose a general framework for a constraint-based process modeling language and its implementation. Our approach supports both ad-hoc and dynamic change, and the transfer of instances can be done easier than in traditional approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Exterminating the Dynamic Change Bug: A Concrete Approach to Support Workflow Change. Information Systems Frontiers 3(3), 297–317 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Aldred, L., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Design and Implementation of the YAWL System. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 142–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jablonski, S.: Dealing with Workflow Change: Identification of Issues and Solutions. International Journal of Computer Systems, Science, and Engineering 15(5), 267–276 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M.: DecSerFlow: Towards a Truly Declarative Service Flow Language. In: Bravetti, M., Núñez, M., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) WS-FM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4184, pp. 1–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M.: Specifying, discovering, and monitoring service flows: Making web services process-aware. BPM Center Report BPM-06-09, BPM Center (2006), http://www.BPMcenter.org

  6. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case Handling: A New Paradigm for Business Process Support. Data and Knowledge Engineering 53(2), 129–162 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adams, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Worklets: A Service-Oriented Implementation of Dynamic Flexibility in Workflows. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2006: CoopIS, DOA, GADA, and ODBASE. LNCS, vol. 4275, pp. 291–308. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Agostini, A., De Michelis, G.: Improving Flexibility of Workflow Management Systems. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 218–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G.: Workflow Evolution. Data and Knowledge Engineering 24(3), 211–238 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dourish, P., Holmes, J., MacLean, A., Marqvardsen, P., Zbyslaw, A.: Freeflow: mediating between representation and action in workflow systems. In: CSCW 1996. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, pp. 190–198. ACM Press, New York, NY, USA (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, C.A., Keddara, K., Rozenberg, G.: Dynamic change within workflow systems. In: Comstock, N., Ellis, C., Kling, R., Mylopoulos, J., Kaplan, S. (eds.) ACM SIGOIS. Proceedings of the Conference on Organizational Computing Systems, Milpitas, California, pp. 10–21. ACM Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Georgakopoulos, D., Hornick, M., Sheth, A.: An Overview of Workflow Management: From Process Modeling to Workflow Automation Infrastructure. Distributed and Parallel Databases 3, 119–153 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Giannakopoulou, D., Havelund, K.: Automata-based verification of temporal properties on running programs. In: ASE 2001. Proceedings of the 16th IEEE international conference on Automated software engineering, p. 412. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke Jr., E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, UK (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Milner, R.: Communicating and Mobile Systems: The Pi-Calculus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Declarative Approach for Flexible Business Processes. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 169–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Petri, C.A.: Kommunikation mit Automaten. PhD thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik und Physik, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPTflex: Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflow without Loosing Control. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 10(2), 93–129 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Correctness Criteria For Dynamic Changes in Workflow Systems: A Survey. Data and Knowledge Engineering 50(1), 9–34 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS: business process modeling, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sudkamp, T.-A.: Languages and machines: an introduction to the theory of computer science, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Pub., Reading (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wainer, J., de Lima Bezerra, F.: Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use. In: Favela, J., Decouchant, D. (eds.) CRIWG 2003. LNCS, vol. 2806, pp. 151–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weske, M.: Formal Foundation and Conceptual Design of Dynamic Adaptations in a Workflow Management System. In: Sprague, R. (ed.) HICSS-34. Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, California (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Robert Meersman Zahir Tari

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pesic, M., Schonenberg, M.H., Sidorova, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (2007). Constraint-Based Workflow Models: Change Made Easy. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76846-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76848-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics