Abstract
Flexible support of distributed business processes is a characteristic challenge for any workflow management system (WfMS). Scalability at the presence of high loads as well as the capability to dynamically adapt running process instances are essential requirements. Should the latter one be not met, the WfMS will not have the necessary flexibility to cover the wide range of process-oriented applications deployed in many organizations. Scalability and flexibility have, for the most part, been treated separately in literature thus far. Even though they are basic needs for a WfMS, the requirements related with them are totally different. To achieve satisfactory scalability, on the one hand the system needs to be designed such that a workflow (WF) instance can be controlled by several WF servers that are as independent from each other as possible. Yet dynamic WF changes, on the other hand, necessitate a (logical) central control instance which knows the current and global state of a WF instance. This paper presents methods which allow ad-hoc modifications (e.g., to insert, delete, or shift steps) to be correctly performed in a distributed WfMS; i.e., in a WfMS with partitioned WF execution graphs and distributed WF control. It is especially noteworthy that the system succeeds in realizing the full functionality as given in the central case while, at the same time, achieving favorable behavior with respect to communication costs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alonso, G., Kamath, M., Agrawal, D., El Abbadi, A., Günthör, R., Mohan, C.: Failure Handling in Large Scale Workflow Management Systems. Technical Report RJ9913, IBM Almaden Research Center (1994)
Barbará, D., Mehrotra, S., Rusinkiewicz, M.: INCAs: Managing Dynamic Workflows in Distributed Environments. J. of Database Management 7(1), 5–15 (1996)
Bauer, T., Dadam, P.: A Distributed Execution Environment for Large-Scale Workflow Management Systems with Subnets and Server Migration. In: Proc. CoopIS 1997, Kiawah Island, SC, pp. 99–108 (1997)
Bauer, T., Dadam, P.: Distribution Models for Workflow Management Systems. Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung 14(4), 203–217 (1999) (in German)
Bauer, T., Dadam, P.: Efficient Distributed Workflow Management Based on Variable Server Assignments. In: Wangler, B., Bergman, L.D. (eds.) CAiSE 2000. LNCS, vol. 1789, pp. 94–109. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Bauer, T., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Intra-Subnet Load Balancing for Distributed Workflow Management Systems. Int. J. Coop. Inf. Sys. 12(3), 295–323 (2003)
Bauer, Th., Reichert, M.: An Approach for Supporting Ad-hoc Process Changes in Distributed Workflow Management Systems. Technical report, University of Twente, CTIT (September 2007)
Cao, J., Yang, J., Chan, W., Xu, C.: Exception handling in distributed workflow systems using mobile agents. In: Proc. ICEBE 2005, pp. 48–55 (2005)
Casati, F., Grefen, P., Pernici, B., Pozzi, G., Sánchez, G.: WIDE: Workflow Model and Architecture. CTIT Technical Report 96-19, University of Twente (1996)
Cichocki, A., Georgakopoulos, D., Rusinkiewicz, M.: Workflow Migration Supporting Virtual Enterprises. In: Proc. BIS 2000, Poznań, pp. 20–35 (2000)
Gray, J., Reuter, A.: Transaction Processing: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1993)
Jablonski, S.: Architecture of Workflow Management Systems. Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung 12(2), 72–81 (1997) (in German)
Joeris, G., Herzog, O.: Managing Evolving Workflow Specifications. In: Proc. CoopIS 1998, New York, pp. 310–321 (1998)
Lenz, R., Reichert, M.: IT Support for Healthcare Processes - Premises, Challenges, Perspectives. DKE 61, 82–111 (2007)
Muth, P., Wodtke, D., Weißenfels, J., Kotz-Dittrich, A., Weikum, G.: From Centralized Workflow Specification to Distributed Workflow Execution. JIIS 10(2), 159–184 (1998)
Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: ADEPT flex – Supporting Dynamic Changes of Workflows Without Losing Control. JIIS 10(2), 93–129 (1998)
Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., Dadam, P.: Flexible support of team processes by adaptive workflow systems. Distributed and Parallel Databases 16(1), 91–116 (2004)
Schuster, H., Neeb, J., Schamburger, R.: A Configuration Management Approach for Large Workflow Management Systems. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration, San Francisco (1999)
Weber, B., Rinderle, S., Reichert, M.: Change patterns and change support features in process-aware information systems. In: CAiSE 2007. Proc. 19th Int’l Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 574–588 (2007)
Weske, M.: Flexible Modeling and Execution of Workflow Activities. In: Proc. 31st Hawaii Int. Conf. on Sys Sciences, Hawaii, pp. 713–722 (1998)
Weske, M.: Workflow Management Through Distributed and Persistent CORBA Workflow Objects. In: Jarke, M., Oberweis, A. (eds.) CAiSE 1999. LNCS, vol. 1626, pp. 446–450. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Reichert, M., Bauer, T. (2007). Supporting Ad-Hoc Changes in Distributed Workflow Management Systems. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2007: CoopIS, DOA, ODBASE, GADA, and IS. OTM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4803. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76848-7_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76846-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76848-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)