Skip to main content

A Consensus Support System for Group Decision Making Problems with Heterogeneous Information

  • Chapter
Intelligent Decision Making: An AI-Based Approach

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 97))

A group decision making (GDM) problem is a decision process where several decision makers (experts, judges, etc.) participate and try to reach a common solution. In the literature these problems have been solved carrying out a selection process that returns the solution set of alternatives from the preferences given by the experts. In order to achieve an agreement on the solution set of alternatives among the experts, it would be adequate to carry out a consensus process before the selection process. In the consensus process the experts discuss and change their preferences in order to achieve a big agreement. Due to the fact that the experts may belong to different research areas, they may express their preferences in different information domains. In this contribution we focus on the consensus process in GDM problems defined in heterogeneous contexts where the experts express their preferences by means of numerical, linguistic and interval-valued assessments. We propose a consensus support system model to automate the consensus reaching process, which provides two main advantages: (1) firstly, its ability to cope with GDM problems with heterogeneous information by means of the Fuzzy Sets Theory, and, (2) secondly, it assumes the moderator's tasks, figure traditionally presents in the consensus reaching process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • P.P. Bonissone and K.S. Decker. Selecting uncertainty calculi and granularity: An experiment in trading-off precision and complexity. Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 217–247. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Bordogna, M. Fedrizzi, and G. Pasi. A linguistic modeling of consensus in group decision making based on OWA operators. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 27:126–132, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. Bryson. Group decision-making and the analytic hierarchy process: Exploring the consensus-relevant information content. Computers and Operational Research, 1(23):27–35, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T.X. Bui. A Group Decison Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decison-Making. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Carlsson, D. Ehrenberg, P. Eklund, M. Fedrizzi, P. Gustafsson, P. Lindholm, G. Merkuryeva, T. Riissanen, and A.G.S. Ventre. Consensus in distributed soft environments. European Journal of Operational Research, 61:165–185, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Delgado, F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and L. Martínez. Combinig numerical and linguistic information in group decision making. Information Sciences, 107:177–194, 1998.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Z.P. Fan and X. Chen. Consensus measures and adjusting inconsistency of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3613:130–139, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Fodor and M. Roubens. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera and E. Herrera-Viedma. Linguistic decision analysis: Steps for solving decision problems under linguistic information. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115:67–82, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera and L. Martínez. An approach for combining linguistic and numerical information based on 2-tuple fuzzy representation model in decision-making. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 8(5):539–562, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, and J.L. Verdegay. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79:73–87, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. Herrera, L. Martínez, and P.J. Sánchez. Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(1):115–132, 2005.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Herrera, and F. Chiclana. A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 32(3):394–402, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Herrera-Viedma, F. Mata, L. Martínez, F. Chiclana, and L.G. Pérez. Measurements of consensus in multi-granular linguistic group decision making. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3131:194–204, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Herrera-Viedma, L. Martínez, F. Mata, and F. Chiclana. A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 13(5):644–658, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Kacprzyk. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18:105–118, 1986.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi, and H. Nurmi. “Soft” degrees of consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majorities. Consensus Under Fuzziness, pages 55–81. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Kim, S.H. Choi, and J.K. Kim. An interactive procedure for multiple attribute group decision making with incomplete information: Range-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 118:139–152, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • D. Kuchta. Fuzzy capital budgeting. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 111:367–385, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • L.I. Kuncheva. Five measures of consensus in group decision making using fuzzy sets. In International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and Applications IFSA-95, pages 141–144, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Kundu. Min-transitivity of fuzzy leftness relationship and its application to decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 86:357–367, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • J.F. Le Téno and B. Mareschal. An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products’ design with ill-defined data on environmental quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 109:522–529, 1998.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • E. Levrat, A. Voisin, S. Bombardier, and J. Bremont. Subjective evaluation of car seat comfort with fuzzy set techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 12:891–913, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Roubens. Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 90:199–206, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. Saint and J.R. Lawson. Rules for Reaching Consensus. A Modern Approach to Decision Making. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Szmidt and J. Kacprzyk. A consensus reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. International Journal of Intelligent System, 18(7):837–852, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 18:183–190, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager. An approach to ordinal decision making. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 12:237–261, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Yager. Protocol for negotiations among multiple intelligent agents. Consensus Under Fuzziness, pages 165–174. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Zadeh. The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Information Sciences, Part I, II, III, 8, 8, 9:199–249, 301–357, 43–80, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • L.A. Zadeh. Fuzzy logic = computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 4(2):103–111, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • S. Zadrozny. An approach to the consensus reaching support in fuzzy environment. Consensus Under Fuzziness, pages 83–109. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Q. Zhang, J.C.H. Chen, and P.P. Chong. Decision consolidation: Criteria weight determination using multiple preference formats. Decision Support Systems, 38(2):247–258, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mata, F., Martínez, L., Herrera-Viedma, E. (2008). A Consensus Support System for Group Decision Making Problems with Heterogeneous Information. In: Phillips-Wren, G., Ichalkaranje, N., Jain, L.C. (eds) Intelligent Decision Making: An AI-Based Approach. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76829-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76829-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76828-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76829-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics