Advertisement

Nurses’ Working Practices: What Can We Learn for Designing Computerised Patient Record Systems?

  • Elke Reuss
  • Rochus Keller
  • Rahel Naef
  • Stefan Hunziker
  • Lukas Furler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4799)

Abstract

As demonstrated by several studies, nurses are reluctant to use poorly designed computerised patient records (CPR). So far, little is known about the nurses’ interaction with paper-based patient records. However, these practices should guide the design of a CPR system. Hence, we investigated the nurses’ work with the patient records by means of observations and structured interviews on wards in internal medicine, geriatrics and surgery. Depending on the working context and the nursing tasks and activities to be performed, characteristic access preferences and patterns were identified when nurses interacted with patient records. In particular, we found typical interaction patterns when nurses performed tasks that included all assigned patients. Another important finding concerns worksheets. Nurses use them during their whole shift to manage all relevant information in a concise way. Based on our findings, we suggest a CPR design which reflects the identified practices and should improve the acceptance of CPR systems in the demanding hospital environment.

Keywords

User-centred system design System analysis Patient record 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ammenwerth, E., Buchauer, A., Bludau, B., Haux, R.: Mobile information and communication tools in the hospital, IMIA Yearbook pp.338–357 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ragneskog, H., Gerdnert, L.: Competence in nursing informatics among nursing students and staff at a nursing institute in Sweden. Health Inf. Lib. J. 23, 126–132 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brender, J., Ammenwerth, E., Nykänen, P., Talmon, J.: Factors Influencing Success and Failure of Health Informatics Systems. Meth. Inf. Med. 45, 125–136 (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berglund, M., Nilsson, Ch., Revay, P., Petersson, G., Nilsson, G.: Nurses’ and nurse students’ demands of functions and usability in a PDA. Int. J. Med. Inf. 76, 530–537 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi, J., et al.: MobileNurse: hand-held information system for point of nursing care. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 74, 245–254 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wu, J., Wang, S., Lin, L.: Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: A structural equation model. Int. J. Med. Inf. 76(1), 66–77 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Potter, P., Boxerman, S., Sledge, J.A., Boxerman, S.B., Grayson, D., Evanoff, B.: Mapping the nursing process. J. of Nursing Administration 34, 101–109 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wolf, L.D., Potter, P., Sledge, J.A., Boxerman, S.B.: Grayson, Describing nurses’ work: combining quantitative and qualitative analysis. Human Factors 48(1), 5–14 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebright, P.R., Patterson, E.S., Chalko, B.A.: Understanding the complexity of registered nurse work in acute care settings. J. of Nursing Administration 33, 630–638 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ammenwerth, E., Kutscha, U., Kutscha, A., Mahler, C., Eichstadter, R., Haux, R.: Nursing process documentation systems in clinical routine - prerequisites and experiences. Int. J. Med. Inf. 64, 187–200 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., Kawasumi, Y.: The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. JAMIA 12(5), 505–516 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Darbyshire, Ph.: Rage against the machine?’: nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information. J. Clin. Nurs. 13, 17–25 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oulasvirta, A.: The Fragmentation of Attention in Mobile Interaction and What to Do with It. Interactions 12(6), 16–18 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rauterberg, M., Spinas, Ph., Strohm, O., Ulich, E., Waeber, D.: Benutzerorientierte Software-Entwicklung, vdf (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van der Meijden, M.J., Tange, H.J., Boiten, J., Troost, J., Hasman, A.: An experimental electronic patient record for stroke patients. Part 1: Situation analysis. Int. J. Med. Inf. 125, 58–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van der Meijden, M.J., Tange, H.J., Boiten, J., Troost, J., Hasman, A.: An experimental electronic patient record for stroke patients. Part 2: System description. Int. J. Med. Inf. 58-59, 127–140 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ammenwerth, E., et al.: PIK-Studie 2000/2001, Evaluation rechnergestützter Pflege-dokumentation auf vier Pilotstationen, Forschungsbericht der Univers. Heidelberg (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Parker, J., Brooker, Ch.: Everyday English for International Nurses. A guide to working in the UK, Churchill Livingstone (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martin, A., Hinds, C., Felix, M.: Documentation practices of nurses in long-term care. J. Clin. Nurs. 8, 345–352 (1999)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manias, E., Aitken, R., Dunning, T.: How graduate nurses use protocols to manage patients’ medications. J. Clin. Nurs. 14, 935–944 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manias, E., Street, A.: Nurse-doctor interactions during critical care ward rounds. J. Clin. Nurs. 10, 442–450 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hardey, M., Payne, S., Coleman, P.: Scraps: Hidden nursing information and its influence on the delivery of care. J. Adv. Nurs. 32, 208–214 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kerr, M.P.: A qualitative study of shift handover practice and function from a socio-technical perspective. J. Adv. Nurs. 37(2), 125–134 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Strople, B., Ottani, P.: Can Technology improve intershift report? What the research reveals. J. of Professional Nursing 22(3), 197–204 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Allen, D.: Record-keeping and routine nursing practices: the view from the wards. J. Adv. Nurs. 27, 1223–1230 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Payne, S., Hardey, M., Coleman, P.: Interactions between nurses during handovers in elderly care. J. Adv. Nurs. 32(2), 277–285 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tang, P., LaRosa, M., Gorden, S.: Use of Computer-based Records, Completeness of Documentation, and Appropriatness of Documented Clinical Decission. JAMIA 6, 245–251 (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reuss, E.: Visualisierungs- und Navigationskonzepte für das computerbasierte Patienten-dossier im Spital. Dissertationsschrift, ETH Zürich  (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Watters, C., Duffy, J., Duffy, K.: Using large tables on small display devices. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies 58, 21–37 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cole, E., Pisano, E.D., Clary, G.J., Zeng, D., Koomen, M., Kuzmiak, C.M., Kyoung, B., Pavic, Y.D.: A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collection. Int. J. Med. Inf. 75(10-11), 722–729 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elke Reuss
    • 1
  • Rochus Keller
    • 2
  • Rahel Naef
    • 3
  • Stefan Hunziker
    • 4
  • Lukas Furler
    • 5
  1. 1.Institute for Information Systems, Department of Computer Science, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092 ZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Datonal AG, Medical Information Systems Research, Lettenstrasse 7, 6343 RotkreuzSwitzerland
  3. 3.Departement of Nursing and Social Services, Kantonsspital Luzern, Spitalstrasse, 6016 LucerneSwitzerland
  4. 4.Departement of Nursing and Medical Informatics, Kantonsspital Luzern, Spitalstrasse, 6016 LucerneSwitzerland
  5. 5.Departement of Nursing, Stadtspital Waid, Tièchestrasse 99, 8037 ZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations