Advertisement

Fostering Creativity Thinking in Agile Software Development

  • Claudio León de la Barra
  • Broderick Crawford
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4799)

Abstract

Psychology and Computer Science are growing in a interdisciplinary relationship mainly because human and social factors are very important in developing software and hardware. The development of new software/hardware products requires the generation of novel and useful ideas. In this paper, the Agile method called eXtreme Programming (XP) is analyzed and evaluated from the perspective of the creativity, in particular the creative performance and structure required at the teamwork level. The conclusion is that XP has characteristics that ensure the creative performance of the team members, but we believe that it can be fostered from a creativity perspective.

Keywords

Creativity New Products Development Software Development Agile Methodologies eXtreme Programming 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    John, M., Maurer, F., Tessem, B.: Human and social factors of software engineering: workshop summary. SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 30, 1–6 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kotler, P., TríasdeBes, F.: Marketing Lateral. Editorial Pearson/Prentice Hall, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sutherland, J.: Agile can scale: Inventing and reinventing scrum in five companies. Cutter IT Journal 14, 5–11 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sutherland, J.: Agile development: Lessons learned from the first scrum. Cutter Agile Project Management Advisory Service: Executive Update 5, 1–4 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sutherland, J.: Recipe for real time process improvement in healthcare. In: 13th Annual Physician-Computer Connection Symposium, Rancho Bernardo, CA, American Society for Medical Directors of Information Systems (AMDIS) (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sutherland, J.: Future of scrum: Parallel pipelining of sprints in complex projects. In: AGILE, pp. 90–102. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sutherland, J., van den Heuvel, W.J.: Towards an intelligent hospital environment: Adaptive workflow in the future. In: HICSS, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beck, K.: Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc, Boston, MA, USA (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fruhling, A.L., Tyser, K., de Vreede, G.J.: Experiences with extreme programming in telehealth: Developing and implementing a biosecurity health care application. In: HICSS, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christensen, C., Bohmer, R., Kenagy, J.: Will disruptive innovations cure health care. Harvard Business Review, 102–111 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dadam, P., Reichert, M., Kuhn, K.: Clinical workflows - the killer application for process oriented information systems. In: BIS 2000. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Business Information Systems, pp. 36–59 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fruhling, A.: Examining the critical requirements, design appoaches and evaluation methods for a public health emergency response system. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18 (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fruhling, A.L., Steinhauser, L., Hoff, G., Dunbar, C.: Designing and evaluating collaborative processes for requirements elicitation and validation. In: HICSS, p. 15. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takeuchi, H., Nonaka, I.: The new product development game. Harvard Business Review (1986)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gu, M., Tong, X.: Towards hypotheses on creativity in software development. In: Bomarius, F., Iida, H. (eds.) PROFES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3009, pp. 47–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chau, T., Maurer, F., Melnik, G.: Knowledge sharing: Agile methods vs tayloristic methods. In: WETICE. Twelfth International Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, pp. 302–307. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maiden, N., Gizikis, A., Robertson, S.: Provoking creativity: Imagine what your requirements could be like. IEEE Software 21, 68–75 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glass, R.L.: Software creativity. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (1995)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crawford, B., de la Barra, C.L.: Enhancing creativity in agile software teams. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, vol. 4536, pp. 161–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robertson, J.: Requirements analysts must also be inventors. IEEE Software 22, 48–50 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maiden, N., Robertson, S.: Integrating creativity into requirements processes: Experiences with an air traffic management system. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering, Paris, France, pp. 105–116. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mich, L., Anesi, C., Berry, D.M.: Applying a pragmatics-based creativity-fostering technique to requirements elicitation. Requirements Engineering 10, 262–275 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maiden, N., Gizikis, A.: Where do requirements come from? IEEE Software 18, 10–12 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Robertson, J.: Eureka! Why analysts should invent requirements. IEEE Software 19, 20–22 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boden, M.: The Creative Mind. Abacus (1990)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Memmel, T., Reiterer, H., Holzinger, A.: Agile methods and visual specification in software development: a chance to ensure universal access. In: Coping with Diversity in Universal Access, Research and Development Methods in Universal Access. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 453–462. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holzinger, A.: Rapid prototyping for a virtual medical campus interface. IEEE Software 21, 92–99 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Holzinger, A., Errath, M.: Designing web-applications for mobile computers: Experiences with applications to medicine. In: Stary, C., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) User-Centered Interaction Paradigms for Universal Access in the Information Society. LNCS, vol. 3196, pp. 262–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Holzinger, A., Errath, M.: Mobile computer Web-application design in medicine: some research based guidelines. Universal Access in the Information Society International Journal 6(1), 31–41 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M.: Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal (39) , 1154–1184Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leonard, D.A., Swap, W.C.: When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Woodman, R.W., Sawyer, J.E., Griffin, R.W.: Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review 18, 293–321 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Welsh, G.: Personality and Creativity: A Study of Talented High School Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina (1967)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. Harper Perennial, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Guilford, J.P.: Intelligence, Creativity and Their Educational Implications. Edits Pub. (1968)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hallman, R.: The necessary and sufficient conditions of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 3 (1963) Also reprinted in Gowan, J.C. et al., Creativity: Its Educational Implications. New York: John Wiley and Co. (1967)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hallman, R.: Aesthetic pleasure and the creative process. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 6, 141–148 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hallman, R.: Techniques of creative teaching. Journal of Creative Behavior I (1966)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amabile, T.: How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, pp. 77–87 (September-October 1998)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kotler, P., Armstrong, G.: Principles of Marketing, 10th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Isaksen, S.G., Lauer, K.J., Ekvall, G.: Situational outlook questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 665–674Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wallas, G.: The art of thought. Harcourt Brace, New York (1926)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lumsdaine, E., Lumsdaine, M.: Creative Problem Solving: Thinking Skills for a Changing World. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York (1995)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Ten Faces of Innovation: IDEO’s Strategies for Defeating the Devil’s Advocate and Driving Creativity Throughout Your Organization. Currency (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudio León de la Barra
    • 1
  • Broderick Crawford
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoChile
  2. 2.Universidad Técnica Federico Santa MaríaChile

Personalised recommendations