Skip to main content

A Diagrammatic Reasoning System for \(\cal ALC\)

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4798))

  • 1234 Accesses

Abstract

Description logics (DLs) are a well-known family of knowledge representation (KR) languages. The notation of DLs has the style of a variable-free first order predicate logic. In this paper a diagrammatic representation of the DL \(\cal ALC\)– based on Peirce’s existential graphs – is presented and a set of transformation rules on these graphs provided. As the transformation rules modify the diagrammatic representation of \(\cal ALC\) this produces a diagrammatic calculus. Some examples present in the paper illustrate the use and properties of this calculus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science 11(1), 65–100 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimojima, A.: On the Efficacy of Representation. PhD thesis, The Department of Philosophy, Indiana University (1996), Available at http://www.jaist.ac.jp/~ashimoji/e-papers.html

  4. Shin, S.J.: The Iconic Logic of Peirce’s Graphs. Bradford Book, Massachusetts (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaines, B.R.: An interactive visual language for term subsumption languages. In: IJCAI, pp. 817–823 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kremer, R.: Visual languages for konwledge representation. In: KAW 1998. Proc. of 11th Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Banff, Alberta, Canada, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nosek, J.T., Roth, I.: A comparison of formal knowledge representation schemes as communication tools: Predicate logic vs semantic network. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33(2), 227–239 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Coupey, P., Faron, C.: Towards correspondence between conceptual graphs and description logics. In: Mugnier, M.-L., Chein, M. (eds.) ICCS 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1453, pp. 165–178. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Brockmans, S., Volz, R., Eberhart, A., Löffler, P.: Visual modeling of owl dl ontologies using uml. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 198–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Stapleton, G.: Reasoning with Constraint Diagrams. PhD thesis, Visual Modelling Group, Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Brighton (2004), Available at http://www.cmis.brighton.ac.uk/Research/vmg/GStapletonthesis.html

  12. Stapleton, G., Howse, J., Taylor, J.: Spider diagrams. LMS Journal of Computation and Mathematics 8, 145–194 (2005)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zeman, J.J.: The Graphical Logic of C. S. Peirce. PhD thesis, University of Chicago (1964), Available at http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/jzeman/

  14. Dau, F., Eklund, P.: Towards a diagrammatic reasoning system for description logics. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing  (submitted, 2006), www.kvocentral.org

  15. Burch, R.W.: A Peircean Reduction Thesis: The Foundation of Topological Logic. Texas Tech. University Press, Texas, Lubbock (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pollandt, S.: Relation graphs: A structure for representing relations in contextual logic of relations. In: Priss, U., Corbett, D.R., Angelova, G. (eds.) ICCS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2393, pp. 24–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Dau, F.: Fixing shin’s reading algorithm for peirce’s existential graphs. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 88–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Zili Zhang Jörg Siekmann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dau, F., Eklund, P. (2007). A Diagrammatic Reasoning System for \(\cal ALC\) . In: Zhang, Z., Siekmann, J. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4798. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76719-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76719-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76718-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76719-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics