Skip to main content

Calculating and Composing Progress Properties in Terms of the Leads-to Relation

  • Conference paper
Book cover Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4789))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 459 Accesses

Abstract

To facilitate the construction of concurrent programs based on progress requirements, we study an integration of the Owicki/Gries theory with UNITY’s leads-to relation. In particular we investigate a set of calculational rules for leads-to, and we study the composition of programs regarding their effect on progress. Apart from parallel composition, we consider the less familiar notion of weak sequential composition. Our techniques are illustrated on two network initialisation protocols that are related to the protocol standard IEEE 1394.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Collette, P., Knapp, E.: A foundation for modular reasoning about safety and progress properties of state-based concurrent programs. Theoretical Computer Science 183, 253–279 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandy, K.M., Misra, J.: Parallel Program Design: A Foundation. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Reading (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dongol, B., Goldson, D.: Extending the theory of Owicki and Gries with a logic of progress. Logical Methods in Computer Science 2(1), 1–25 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Devillers, M.C.A., Griffioen, W.O.D., Romijn, J.M.T., Vaandrager, F.W.: Verification of a leader election protocol – formal methods applied to IEEE 1394. Formal methods in system design 16(3), 307–320 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dijkstra, E.W.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dongol, B., Mooij, A.J.: Progress in deriving concurrent programs: emphasizing the role of stable guards. In: Uustalu, T. (ed.) MPC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4014, pp. 140–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dongol, B., Mooij, A.J.: Streamlining progress-based derivations of concurrent programs. Technical Report SSE-2006-06, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, 2006. Accepted for publication in the Formal Aspects of Computing journal (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dongol, B.: Formalising progress properties of non-blocking programs. In: Liu, Z., He, J. (eds.) ICFEM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4260, pp. 284–303. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fokkink, W., Groote, J.F., Reniers, M.A.: Process algebra needs proof methodology. In: Aceto, L. (ed.) The concurrency column. Bulletin of the EATCS, vol. 82, pp. 108–125 (February 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feijen, W.H.J., van Gasteren, A.J.M.: On a method of multiprogramming. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoogerwoord, R.R.: A formal derivation of a sliding window protocol. Computer Science Report 06-31, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE standard for a high performance serial bus, IEEE Std 1394-1995 (August 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. IEEE standard for high performance serial bus bridges, IEEE Std 1394.1-2004 (July 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Telecommunication Union - Telecom Standardization. Message Sequence Chart, ITU-T Recommendation Z.120 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, C.B.: Development methods for computer programs including a notion of interference, Oxford University Computing Laboratory. Dphil. thesis (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Knapp, E.: Derivation of concurrent programs: two examples. Science of Computer Programming 19(1), 1–23 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Lynch, N.: Distributed Algorithms. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Misra, J.: Phase synchronization. Information Processing Letters 38(2), 101–105 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Misra, J.: A logic for concurrent programming. Technical report, The University of Texas at Austin (April 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mooij, A.J.: Constructive formal methods and protocol standardization, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, PhD thesis (October 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mooij, A.J.: Constructing and reasoning about security protocols using invariants. In: REFINE 2007. ENTCS (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: Completing the temporal picture. Theoretical Computer Science 83(1), 91–130 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mooij, A.J., Wesselink, J.W.: A formal analysis of a dynamic distributed spanning tree algorithm. Computer Science Report 03-16, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mooij, A.J., Wesselink, J.W.: Incremental verification of Owicki/Gries proof outlines using PVS. In: Lau, K.-K., Banach, R. (eds.) ICFEM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3785, pp. 390–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Owicki, S., Gries, D.: An axiomatic proof technique for parallel programs I. Acta Informatica 6, 319–340 (1976)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasetya, I.S.W.B., Vos, T.E.J., Azurat, A., Swierstra, S.D.: A UNITY-based framework towards component based systems. In: Higashino, T. (ed.) OPODIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3544, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Romijn, J., Wesselink, W., Mooij, A.: Assertion-based proof checking of Chang-Roberts leader election in PVS. In: Mamjoshi, K.S., Yoneda, T., Higashino, T., Okamura, Y. (eds.) TSDM 2000. LNCS, vol. 4762, Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stolen, K.: A method for the development of totally correct shared-state parallel programs. In: Groote, J.F., Baeten, J.C.M. (eds.) CONCUR 1991. LNCS, vol. 527, pp. 510–525. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, Q., de Roever, W.-P., He, J.: The rely-guarantee method for verifying shared variable concurrent programs. Formal Aspects of Computing, 149–174 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Michael Butler Michael G. Hinchey María M. Larrondo-Petrie

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mooij, A.J. (2007). Calculating and Composing Progress Properties in Terms of the Leads-to Relation. In: Butler, M., Hinchey, M.G., Larrondo-Petrie, M.M. (eds) Formal Methods and Software Engineering. ICFEM 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76650-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76650-6_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-76648-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-76650-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics