Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 605))

  • 1311 Accesses

Abstract

The tools of modern portfolio theory are in general use in the equity markets, either in the form of portfolio optimization software or as an accepted frame-work in which the asset managers think about stock selection. In the fixed income market on the other hand, these tools seem irrelevant or inapplicable. Bond portfolios are nowadays mainly managed by a comparison of portfolio risk measures vis á vis a benchmark. The portfolio manager’s views about the future evolution of the term structure of interest rates translate themselves directly into a positioning relative to his benchmark, taking the risks of these deviations from the benchmark into account only in a very crude fashion, i.e. without really quantifying them probabilistically. This is quite surprising since sophisticated models for the evolution of interest rates are commonly used for interest rate derivatives pricing and the derivation of fixed income risk measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Starting with the seminal work of Markowitz (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See e.g. Grinold/Kahn (2000), Litterman (2003) or Elton et al. (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  3. These are commonly partial duration like risk measures, such as level, slope and curvature durations introduced in Willner (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See the standard literature on bond portfolio selection, e.g. Fabozzi (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Usually the tracking error is calculated but doesn’t receive much attention.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For example to derive a duration measure for swaptions. For a review of commonly used bond portfolio risk measures see Golub/Tilman (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilhelm (1992), p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Cheng (1962), p. 492.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Cheng (1962), p. 491.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Cheng (1962), p. 499.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Bradley/Crane (1972), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Bradley/Crane (1972), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vasicek (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. See Brennan/Schwartz (1980), p. 406.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Wilhelm (1992), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Wilhelm (1992), p. 216.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Fabozzi/Fong (1994), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fabozzi/ Fong (1994), p. 154.

    Google Scholar 

  19. See Elton et al. (2003), pp. 540–546.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Elton et al. (2003), p. 540.

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Elton et al. (2003), pp. 543–546.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See Korn/Koziol (2006), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Sørensen (1999), p. 517.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Introduction. In: Bond Portfolio Optimization. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 605. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76593-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics