Advertisement

Modeling Human Education Data: From Equation-Based Modeling to Agent-Based Modeling

  • Yuqing Tang
  • Simon Parsons
  • Elizabeth Sklar
Conference paper
  • 635 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4442)

Abstract

Agent-based simulation is increasingly used to analyze the performance of complex systems. In this paper we describe results of our work on one specific agent-based model, showing how it can be validated against the equation-based model from which it was derived, and demonstrating the extent to which it can be used to derive additional results over and above those that the equation-based model can provide.

The agent-based model that we build deals with human capital, the number of years of formal schooling that an individual chooses to undertake. For verification, we show that our agent-based model makes similar predictions about the growth in inequality — that is the growth of the variance in human capital across the population — as th equation-based model from which it is derived. In addition, we show that our model can make predictions about the change in human capital from generation to generation that are beyond the equation-based model.

Keywords

Human Capital MultiAgent System Autonomous Agent Emergent Phenomenon High Human Capital 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernard, R.N.: Using adaptive agent-based simulation models to assist planners in policy development: The case of rent control. Working Paper 99-07-052, Sante Fe Institute (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modelling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99(3), 7280–7287 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenwald, A., Kephart, J.: Shopbots and pricebots. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 506–511, Stockholm, Sweden (August 1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grimm, V.: Ten years of individual-based modeling in ecology: what have we learned and what could we learn in the future? Ecological Modeling 129–148 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hegselmann, R.: Cellular automata in the social sciences: Persepectives, restrictions and artefacts. In: Hegselmann, R., Mueller, U., Troitzsch, K.G. (eds.) Modelling and Simulation in the Social Sciences From the Philosophy of Science Point of View, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kephart, J., Greenwald, A.: Shopbot economics. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5(3), 255–287 (2002)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kremer, M.: How much does sorting increase inequality? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1), 115–139 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laitner, J.: Earnings within educational groups and overall productivity growth. The Journal of Political Economy 108(4), 807–832 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Dyke Parunak, H., Savit, R., Riolo, R.L.: Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based modeling: A case study and users’ guide. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiagent-based Simulation, pp. 10–25 (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Sklar, E., Davies, M.: Multiagent Simulation of Learning Environments. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2005), pp. 953–959 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sklar, E., Davies, M., Co, M.S.T.: SimEd: Simulating Education as a MultiAgent System. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2004), pp. 998–1005 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sole, R.V., Gamarra, J.G.P., Ginovart, M., Lopez, D.: Controlling chaos in ecology: From deterministic to individual-based models. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 61, 1187–1207 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Tang, Y., Parsons, S., Sklar, E.: An Agent-based Model that Relates Investment in Education to Economic Prosperity. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2007) (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R., Kinny, D.: The gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3(3), 285–312 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuqing Tang
    • 1
  • Simon Parsons
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth Sklar
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Graduate Center, City University of New York, 365, 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10016USA
  2. 2.Department of Computer & Information Science, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, 2900 Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11210USA

Personalised recommendations