Advertisement

Analyzing Dynamics of Peer-to-Peer Communication -From Questionnaire Surveys to Agent-Based Simulation

  • Shinako Matsuyama
  • Takao Terano
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4442)

Abstract

This paper discusses dynamic properties of peer-to-peer communication networks, which emerge from information exchanges among people. First, we gather activity data of communication among people through questionnaires in order to categorize both information (contents) and people, then we develop agent-based simulation models to examine implicit mechanisms behind the dynamics. The agent-based models enable us to discover the quality of information exchanged and the preferences of specific communication groups. The simulation results have suggested that 1) peer-to-peer communication networks have scale-free and small world properties, 2) the characteristics of contents and users are observed in word-of-mouth communications, and 3) the combination of real survey data and agent-based simulation is effective.

Keywords

Agent-Based Simulation peer-to-peer communication network analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rosen, E.: The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing. Doubleday (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kokokusha: Survey for the word of mouth (In Japanese) (2005), http://www.kokokusha.co.jp/service/kuchikomi.html
  3. 3.
    Ebel, H., et al.: Dynamics of Social Networks. Complexity 8(2), 24–27 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Scott, J.: Social Network Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barabasi, A-L.: Linked: The New Science of Networks. Perseus Books Group (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Watts, D.J.: Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness (Princeton Studies in Complexity). Princeton Univ. Pr., Princeton (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newman, M.E.J.: The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM REVIEW 2003 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics 45(2), 167–256 (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Terano, T., Deguchi, H., Takadama, K.: Meeting the Challenge of Social Problems via Agent-Based Simulation. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilbert, N.: Agent-based social simulation: dealing with complexity. The Complex Systems Network of Excellence (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bonabeau, E.: Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems. PNAS 99(suppl 3), 7280–7287 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuyama, S., Kunigami, M., Terano, T.: Multi-Agent Modeling of Peer to Peer Communication with Scale-Free and Small-World Properties. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds.) KES 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3684, pp. 772–778. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barabasi, A.L., Albert, R., Jeong, H.: Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A 272, 173–187 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dorogovtsev, S.N., Mendes, J.F.F.: Scaling behaviour of developing and decaying networks. Europhys. Lett. 52, 33–39 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holme, P.: Edge overload breakdown in evolving networks. Phys. Rev. E 66 art. no.036119 (2002)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shinako Matsuyama
    • 1
    • 2
  • Takao Terano
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. Computational Intelligence and Systems Sciences, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatsuda-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8502Japan
  2. 2.Sony Corporation, 6-7-35 Kitashinagawa Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141-0001Japan

Personalised recommendations