Comparing Timoshenko Beam to Energy Beam for Fitting Noisy Data
In this paper we develop highly flexible Timoshenko beam model for tracking large deformations in noisy data. We demonstrate that by neglecting some physical properties of Timoshenko beam, classical energy beam can be derived. The comparison of these two models in terms of their robustness and precision against noisy data is given. We demonstrate that Timoshenko beam model is more robust and precise for tracking large deformations in the presence of clutter and partial occlusions. The experiments using both synthetic and real image data are performed. In synthetic images we fit both models to noisy data and use Monte Carlo simulation to analyze their performance. In real images we track deformations of the pole vault, the rat whiskers and the car antenna.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Cohen, L., Cohen, I.: Deformable models for 3-d medical images using finite elements and balloons. In: Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 592–598 (1992)Google Scholar
- 5.Gibson, S., Mirtich, B.: A survey of deformable modeling in computer graphics. Technical report, Mitsubishi Electric Research Lab, Cambridge, MA (1997)Google Scholar
- 7.Metaxas, D.: Physics-Based Deformable Models: Applications to Computer Vision, Graphics, and Medical Imaging. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)Google Scholar
- 9.Essa, I., Sclaroff, S., Pentland, A.: Physically-based modeling for graphics and vision. In: Martin, R. (ed.) Directions in Geometric Computing. Information Geometers, U.K (1993)Google Scholar
- 10.Sclaroff, S., Pentland, A.P.: Physically-based combinations of views: Representing rigid and nonrigid motion. Technical Report 1994-016 (1994)Google Scholar
- 12.Delingette, H., Hebert, M., Ikeuchi, K.: Deformable surfaces: A free-form shape representation. SPIE Geometric Methods in Computer Vision 1570, 21–30 (1991)Google Scholar
- 13.Nastar, C., Ayache, N.: Frequency-based nonrigid motion analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18(11) (1996)Google Scholar
- 14.O’Brien, J.F., Cook, P.R., Essl, G.: Synthesizing sounds from physically based motion. In: Fiume, E. (ed.) SIGGRAPH 2001. Computer Graphics Proceedings, pp. 529–536 (2001)Google Scholar
- 15.Tsap, L., Goldgof, D., Sarkar, S.: Fusion of physically-based registration and deformation modeling for nonrigid motion analysis (2001)Google Scholar
- 16.Bartoli, A., Zisserman, A.: Direct Estimation of Non-Rigid Registration. In: British Machine Vision Conference, Kingston, UK (2004)Google Scholar
- 17.Timoshenko, S., MacCullogh, G.: Elements of Strength in Materials, 3rd edn., van Nostrand. New York (1949)Google Scholar