Skip to main content

Towards Ontological Commitments with Ω-RIDL Markup Language

  • Conference paper
Advances in Rule Interchange and Applications (RuleML 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4824))

Abstract

In the DOGMA (Developing Ontology-Grounded Methods and Applications) ontology engineering approach, ontology construction starts from an uninterpreted base of elementary fact types, called lexons, which are mined from linguistic descriptions. Applications that ontologically commit to such a lexon base are assigned a formal semantics by mapping the application symbols to paths in this lexon base. Besides specifying which concepts are used, we restrict how they may be used and queried with semantic constraints, or rules, based on the fact-based database modeling method NIAM/ORM. Such ontological commitments are specified in the Ω-RIDL language. In this paper we present the Ω-RIDL Markup Language and illustrate with a case from the field of Human Resources Management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bloesch, A.C., Halpin, T.A.: Conceptual queries using ConQuer–II. In: ER 1997. Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Conceptual Modeling, pp. 113–126. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. De Leenheer, P., de Moor, A., Meersman, R.: Context dependency management in ontology engineering: a formal approach. In: Spaccapietra, S., Atzeni, P., Fages, F., Hacid, M.-S., Kifer, M., Mylopoulos, J., Pernici, B., Shvaiko, P., Trujillo, J., Zaihrayeu, I. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics VIII. LNCS, vol. 4380, pp. 26–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. de Moor, A., Leenheer, P.D., Meersman, R.: DOGMA-MESS. In: Schärfe, H., Hitzler, P., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) ICCS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4068, pp. 189–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. De Troyer, O.: On Data Schema Transformations. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, Netherlands (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Troyer, O., Meersman, R., Verlinden, P.: RIDL* on the CRIS Case: a Workbench for NIAM. In: Olle, T., Verrijn-Stuart, A., Bhabuta, L. (eds.) Information Systems Design Methodologies: Computerized Assistance during the Information Systems Life Cycle, pp. 375–459. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Falkenberg, E.D.: Concepts for modelling information. In: IFIP Working Conf. on Modelling in Data Base Management Systems, pp. 95–109 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruber, T.R.: Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Guarino, N., Poli, R. (eds.) Formal Ontology in Conceptual Analysis and Knowledge Representation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43(5-6), 625–640 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guarino, N.: Understanding, building and using ontologies. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 46(2-3), 293–310 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology and information systems. In: FOIS 1998. Int. Conf. On Formal Ontology In Information Systems, Trento, Italy, pp. 3–15. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating ontological decisions with ontoclean. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 43, 625–640 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases: From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jarrar, M., Meersman, R.: Formal ontology engineering in the DOGMA approach. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2002, DOA 2002, and ODBASE 2002. LNCS, vol. 2519, pp. 1238–1254. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jarrar, M., Demey, J., Meersman, R.: On using conceptual data modeling for ontology engineering. In: Spaccapietra, S., March, S., Aberer, K. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics I. LNCS, vol. 2800, pp. 185–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meersman, R.: Towards the very high level end user. In: Infotech State of the Art Report, Pergamon Press (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meersman, R.: The RIDL conceptual language. Research report, Int. Centre for Information Analysis Services, Control Data, Brussels (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meersman, R.: Semantic ontology tools in is design. In: Raś, Z.W., Skowron, A. (eds.) ISMIS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1609, pp. 30–45. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Meersman, R.: Ontologies and databases: More than a fleeting resemblance. In: d’Atri, A., Missikoff, M. (eds.) OES/SEO 2001 Rome Workshop, Luiss Publications, Missikoff (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meersman, R.: Web and ontologies: Playtime or business at the last frontier in computing? In: Proc. of the NSF-EU Workshop on Database and Information Systems Research for Semantic Web and Enterprises, pp. 61–67 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mena, E., Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.P., Illarramendi, A.: OBSERVER: An approach for query processing in global information systems based on interoperation across pre-existing ontologies. In: Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems, pp. 14–25 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Spyns, P.: Object role modelling for ontology engineering in the DOGMA framework. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2005 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 3762, pp. 710–719. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Spyns, P., Meersman, R., Jarrar, M.: Data modelling versus ontology engineering. Database Management and Information Systems 31(4), 12–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tang, Y., Meersman, R.: Towards building semantic decision table with domain ontologies. In: Int. Conf. on Inf. Tech. and Management, pp. 14–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Proper, H.A., van der Weide, T.: A Conceptual Language for the Description and Manipulation of Complex Information Models. In: Gupta, G. (ed.) Seventeenth Annual Computer Science Conference: Gupta, G, vol. 16, pp. 157–167. University of Canterbury (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Trog, D., Vereecken, J., Christiaens, S., De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: T-lex: A role-based ontology engineering tool. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2006 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 4278, pp. 1191–1200. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. van Griethuysen, J.J.: Concepts and terminology for the conceptual schema and the information base. Technical Report ISO/TC97/TR9007, International Standards Organization (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Verheijen, G., van Bekkum, P.: NIAM, aN Information Analysis Method. In: Olle, T., Sol, H., Verrijn-Stuart, A. (eds.) IFIP Conf. on Comparative Review of Information Systems Methodologies, pp. 537–590. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Verheyden, P., De Bo, J., Meersman, R.: Semantically unlocking database content through ontology-based mediation. In: SWDB, pp. 109–126 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao, G., Gao, Y., Meersman, R.: An ontology-based approach to business modelling. In: ICKEDS 2004. Proc. of the Int. Conf. of Knowledge Engineering and Decision Support, pp. 213–221 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, G., Meersman, R.: Architecting ontology for scalability and versatility. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1164–1605. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Adrian Paschke Yevgen Biletskiy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Trog, D., Tang, Y., Meersman, R. (2007). Towards Ontological Commitments with Ω-RIDL Markup Language. In: Paschke, A., Biletskiy, Y. (eds) Advances in Rule Interchange and Applications. RuleML 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4824. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75975-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75975-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75974-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75975-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics