Abstract
In times of rapidly changing physical and regulatory environments, adaptiveness is one of the central parameters of sustainable water management. To investigate how different institutional settings are able to adapt to new conditions, two organisational settings in the Rhine basin are compared: the German water association Wupperverband and the Dutch water board Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden (HDSR). To facilitate comparison, the institutional settings of both regulatory systems are analysed based on empirical data, and using the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IAD) (Ostrom 2005).
Historical development, Institutional settings for membership, roles and decision making of responsible water management agencies are analysed and compared in view of important adaptive management prerequisites. We argue that combinations of different institutional elements influence the capacity of both water agencies to adapt to changing conditions in an effective and legitimate way. Special focus is put on the role of emergent leadership, social learning, and both formal and informal forms of participation by stakeholders outside of the regulatory system.
Chapter PDF
References
Folke, C., Colding, J., Berkes, F. (2003): Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C, (eds.): Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–387.
Gunderson, L. and C. Holling (2001): Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems.
HDSR (2003): Waterbeheersplan Houten, Hoogheemraadschap De Stichtse Rijnlanden.
Hofius, K. (1996): The River Rhine. Geography of its catchment area. In: Deutsches IHP/OHP-Nationalkomitee (edit.): The River Rhine — Development and Management. Koblenz. 3–11.
Hosking, D. M. (1988): Organizing, leadership and skilful process, Journal of Management Studies 25:2, 147–166
Huisman, P. (2002): How the Netherlands Finance Public Water Management. European Water Management Online.
Kuks, S. (2002): The Evolution of the National Water Regime in the Netherlands. Euwareness Netherlands. Enschede, University of Twente.
Ministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (MUNLV) (edit.) (2005): Ergebnisbericht Wupper — Wasserrahmenrichtlinie in NRW — Bestandsaufnahme. Düsseldorf.
Mostert, E., C. Pahl-Wostl, Y. Rees, B. Searle, D. Tàbara, and J. Tippett (2007): Social learning in European river-basin management: barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society 12(1): 19.
Olsson, P., L. H. Gunderson, S. R. Carpenter, P. Ryan, L. Lebel, C. Folke, and C. S. Holling (2006): Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 18.
Olsson, P., Folke, C, Berkes, F. (2004): Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. In: Environmental Management 34(1). 75–90.
Ostrom, E. (2005): Understanding institutional diversity, Princeton University Press.
Pahl-Wostl, C (2007): Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. In: Water Resources Management, Volume 21, Number 1, pp. 49–62(14)
Pahl-Wostl, C., Downing, T., Kabat, P., Magnuszewski, P., Meigh, J., Schlueter, M., Sendzimir, J., Werners, S. (2002): Transitions to Adaptive Water Management: the NeWater Project. Project report. Working paper 1.
Raadgever, T. and E. Mostert (2005). Governance, institutions and participation. Case study basin the Rhine, country report the Netherlands. NeWater Project report. Delft, RBA-Centre, Delft University of Technology.
Van Steen, P. and P. Pellenbarg (2004): Water Management Challenges in the Netherlands. In: Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95(5). 590–598.
Walters, Carl. 1986. Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
Water Framework Directive (WFD) — Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. OJ L 327/1
Young, O. (2002): The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change. Fit, Interplay and Scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Möllenkamp, S., Lamers, M., Ebenhöh, E. (2008). Institutional elements for adaptive water management regimes. Comparing two regional water management regimes in the Rhine basin. In: Pahl-Wostl, C., Kabat, P., Möltgen, J. (eds) Adaptive and Integrated Water Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75941-6_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75940-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75941-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)