Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Revisionsendoprothetik der Hüftpfanne pp 231–238Cite as

Die neue modulare Revisionsstützpfannen-(MRS-) Integration

  • Chapter

  • 1437 Accesses

Auszug

Im Vergleich zu Primärimplantationen ist nach der sog. „Schwedenstudie“ [6] seit einigen Jahren ein überproportionaler Anstieg von Revisionsoperationen am Hüftgelenk zu verzeichnen. Dabei beträgt das Verhältnis von Pfannenzu Schaftwechsel ca. 2:1, was vornehmlich mit dem stark gestiegenen Auftreten von sog. „Typ-III-Defekten“ nach Paprosky (24%) einhergeht [7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Garcia-Cimbrelo E (1999) Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 14:397–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B (2003) Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 85:2358–2364

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harris WH, McGann WA (1986) Loosening of the femoral component after use of the medullary-plug cementing technique. Follow-up note with a minimum five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [AM] 68:1064–1066

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris WH (1998) Average 12-year outcome of a chrome-cobalt, beaded, bony ingrowth acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 13:846

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hooten JP Jr, Engh CA, Heekin RD, Vinh TN (1986) Structural bulk allografts in acetabular reconstruktion. Analysis of two grafts retrieved at post-mortem. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 78:270–275

    Google Scholar 

  6. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garrelick G, Söderman P (2004) The Swedish hip replacemant register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86:363

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moskal JT, Shen FH, Brown TE (2002) The fate of stable femoral components retained during isolated acetabular revision: a six-to-twelve-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 84:250–255

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schreurs BW, Slooff TJ, Gardeniers JW, Buma P (2001) Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years’ experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 393:202–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebenrock KA, Tannast M, Kim S, Morgenstern W, Ganz R (2005) Acetabular reconstruction using a roof reinforcement ring with hook for total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip-osteoarthritis minimum 10-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty 20:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Won YY, Longjohn D, Wan Z (2001) Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction. J Arthroplasty 16:961–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wirtz DC, Fischer H, Zilkens KW, Niethard FU, Marx R (1999) Optimierung des Knochenzement-Implantat-Verbundes durch hydrolysebeständige Konditionierung der Metalloberfläche. Z Orthop 137:447–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wirtz DC, Thielmann F, Holz U (1997) Zementfreie Revisionsarthroplastik der Hüftpfanne-Mittelfristige Ergebnisse mit dem trabekulär orientierten Pfannenimplantat. Z Orthop 135:301–309

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wirtz DC (2002) Eine neue Beschichtungsmethode für zementierte Femurschaftimplantate zur hydrolysestabilen Optimierung des MetallKnochenzementverbundes. Habilitationsschrift Aachener Beiträge zur Medizin, Bd 25. Wissenschaftsverlag, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zehntner MK, Ganz R (1994) Midterm results (5.5-10 years) of acetabular allograft reconstruction with the acetabular reinforcement ring during total hip revision. J Arthroplasty 9:469–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peter Brehm GmbH, Am Mühlberg 30, 91085, Weisendorf, Deutschland

    Dipl. Kfm. Marc D. Michel

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Siegmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. D. C. Wirtz

Authors
  1. Dipl. Kfm. Marc D. Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. D. C. Wirtz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Siegmund-Freud-Str.25, 53127, Bonn

    Dieter C. Wirtz

  2. St.Franziskus-Hospital Köln Orthopädie, Schönsteinstr.63, 50825, Köln

    Christof Rader

  3. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik am RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm

    Heiko Reichel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michel, M.D., Wirtz, D.C. (2008). Die neue modulare Revisionsstützpfannen-(MRS-) Integration. In: Wirtz, D.C., Rader, C., Reichel, H. (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik der Hüftpfanne. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75649-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75649-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75648-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75649-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation