Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Revisionsendoprothetik der Hüftpfanne pp 201–229Cite as

Werkstoff-und designrelevante Aspekte von Pfannenrevisionsimplantaten

  • Chapter

  • 1458 Accesses

Auszug

Das jüngere Eintritts alter von Patienten in die Primärversorgung zieht bei begrenzter Haltbarkeit künstlicher Hüftgelenke zwangsläufig die Zunahme aseptischer Lockerungen nach sich. Verbunden mit einem insgesamt höheren Lebensalter ist künftig auch mit zunehmenden Re-Revisionen zu rechnen. Unter den Ursachen für aseptische Lockerungen sind Fremdkörperreaktionen auf Polyethylenabrieb [1] aber auch zerrütteter Zement hervorzuheben [2]. Vor diesem Hintergrund findet Scit langem eine kritische Auseinandersetzung mit den verwendeten Werkstoffen statt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Harris WH (1994) Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Hess T (1989) Die Bedeutung von Abrieb und Materialermüdung bei der Prothesenlockerung an der Hüfte. Orthopäde 18:350–369

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirakawa K, Mitsugo N, Koshino T, Saito T, Hirasawa Y, Toshikazu K(2001) Effect of acetabular cup position and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 388:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kohler G (2003) Dislocations after total hip replacement. In: Ochsner PE (ed) Total hip replacement. Implantation technique and local complications. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Comper CL, Zimmermann JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60-A:217–227

    Google Scholar 

  6. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson RH, Head WC, Beklacich FM, Malinin TH (1989) Noncemented acetabular revision arthroplasty using allograft bone. Clin Orthop 249:30–43

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher J, Galvin A, Tipper J, Stewart T, Stone M, Ingham E (2005) Comparison of the functional biological activity and osteolytic potential of ceramic on ceramic and cross linked polyethylene bearings in the hip. In: D’Antonio JA, Dietrich M (eds) Bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 21–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Digas G, Kärrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P (2004) Highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res 429:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D’Lima DD, Hermida JC, Chen PC, Colwell CW Jr(2003) Polyethylene cross-linking by two different methods reduces acetabular liner wear in a hip joint wear simulator. J Orthop Res 21:761–766

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muratoglu OR, Bragdon CR, O’Connor DO, Perinchief RS, Estok DM, II Jasty M, Harris WH (2001) Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 16:24–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dumbleton JH, D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Wang A (2006) The basis for a second-generation highly cross-linked UHMWPE. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:265–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Willert HG, Lang I, Rabenscifner L (2005) Wenig oder kein Abrieb von Pfannenimplantaten aus hochvernetztem Polyethylen, Histomorphologie an periprothetischem Gewebe von Hüftendoprothesen mit DURASULtm Pfannen. Biomaterialien 6:136

    Google Scholar 

  14. Endo MM, Barbour PS, Barton DC, Fisher J, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Stone MH (2001) Comparative wear and wear debris under three different counterface conditions of cross-linked and non-crosslinked ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomed Mater Eng 11:23–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamamoto K, Clarke IC, Masoaka T, Oonishi H, Williams PA, Good VD, Imakiire A (2001) Microwear phenomena of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene cups and debris morphology related to gamma radiation dose in simulator study. J Biomed Mater Res 56:65–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Green TR, Fisher J, Stone M, Wroblewski BM, Ingham E (1998) Polyethylene particles of a ‚critical size’ are necessary for the induction of citokines by macrophages in vitro. Biomaterials 19:2297–2302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker DA, Hastings RS, Pruitt L (1999) Study of fatigue resistance of chemical and radiation crosslinked medical grade ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J Biomed Mater Res 46:573–581

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Postak PD, Ratzel, AR, Greenwald AS (2003) Highly cross-linked polyethylene modular acetabular designs: performance characteristics. Presented at AAOS 2003. Orthopedic Research Lab, Lutherian Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  19. Oral E, Rowell SL, Muratoglu OK (2006) The effect of alpha-tocopherol on the oxidation and free radical decay in irradiated UHMWPE. Biomaterials 27:5580–5587

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pitto RP, Blanquaert D, Hohmann D (2002) Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty: zirconia-alumina pairing. Contribution or caveat? Acta Orthop Belg 68:242–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke IC, Green DD, Pezzotti G, Donaldson (2005) 20 years experience of zirconia total hip replacements. In: D’Antonio JA, Dietrich M (eds) Bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 67–78

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Good V, Ries M, Barrack RL, Widding K, Hunter G, Heuer D (2003) Reduced wear with oxidized zirconium femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):105–110

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kuntz M (2006) Validation of a new high performance alumina matrix composite for use in total joint replacement. Semin Arthro 17:141–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Garino JP (2000) Modern ceramic-on-ceramic total hip systems in the United States: early results. Clin Orthop 41–47

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sedel L, Hamadouche M, Bizot P, Nizard R (2003) Long term data concerning the use of alumina on alumina bearings in total hip replacements. In: Ben-Nissan B, Sher D, Walsh W (eds) Bioceramics-15. Trans Tech Publ, Enfield, New Hampshire, pp 769–772

    Google Scholar 

  26. Plitz W (2007) Die Metall-Metall-Gleitpaarung in der Hüftendoprothetik / Fortschritt oder Rückschritt? Orthopäde 36:212–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harman MK, Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) Wear analysis of a retrieved hip implant with titanium nitrid coating. J Arthroplasty 19:898–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Charnley J, Kamangar A, Longfield MD (1969) The optimum size of prosthetic heads in relation to the wear of plastic sockets in total replacement of the hip. Med Biol Eng 7:31–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Orishimo KF, Claus AM, Sychterz CJ, Engh CA (2003) Relationship between polyethylene wear and osteolysis in hips with a second-generation porous-coated cementless cup after seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:1095–1099

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur

  1. Affatato S, Ghisolfi E, Cacciari GL, Toni A (2000) Alumina femoral head fracture: an in vitro study. Int J Artif Organs 23:256–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Affatato S, Bersaglia G, Rocchi M, Taddei P, Fagnano C, Toni A (2005) Wear behaviour of cross-linked polyethylene assessed in vitro under severe conditions. Biomaterials 26:3259–3267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berli BJ, Ping G, Dick W, Morscher EW (2007) Nonmodular flexible press-fit cup in primary total hip arthroplasty: 15-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007 Mar 29; [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bourne RB, Barrack R, Rorabeck CH, Salehi A, Good V (2005) Arthroplasty options for the young patient: Oxinium on cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:159–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradford L, Baker D Ries MD, Pruitt LA (2004) Fatigue crack propagation resistance of highly crosslinked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 68–72

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brockett C, Williams S, Jin Z, Isaac G, Fisher J (2006) Friction of total hip replacements with different bearings and loading conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81B:508–515

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brodner W, Grohs JG, Bancher-Todesca D, Dorotka R, Meisinger V, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R (2004a) Does the placenta inhibit the passage of chromium and cobalt after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 19:102–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brodner W, Grubl A, Jankovsky R, Meisinger V, Lehr S, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2004b) Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:66–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Tänzer M (1999) The Otto Aufranc Award. Wear and lubrication of metal-on-metal hip implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 10–24

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charnley J (1979) Low friction arthroplasty of the hip. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook SD, Barrack RL, Baffes GC, Clemow AJ, Serekian P, Dong N, Kester MA (1994) Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 80–88

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R (2004) Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:41–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Czichos H, Habig KH (2003) Tribologie-Handbuch. GWV Fachverlage, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  14. D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN, Bierbaum BE, Ramakrishnan R, Naughton M, Sutton K (2005) Five-year experience with Crossfire highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:143–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Digas G, Karrholm J, Thanner J, Malchau H, Herberts P (2003) Highly cross-linked polyethylene in cemented THA: randomized study of 61 hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 126–138

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dowson D, Jin ZM (2006) Metal-on-metal hip joint tribology. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:107–118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dowson D, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac GH (2004) A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-onmetal joints: Part II: design. J Arthroplasty 19:124–130

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dumbleton JH, Manley MT (2005) Metal-on-metal total hip replacement: what does the literature say? J Arthroplasty 20:174–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Elfick AP, Hall RM, Pinder IM, Unsworth A (1998) Wear in retrieved acetabular components: effect of femoral head radius and patient parameters. J Arthroplasty 13:291–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Elke R (2001) Particle disease. Is tribology a topic in revision surgery?. Orthopade 30:258–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Endo M, Tipper JL, Barton DC, Stone MH, Ingham E, Fisher J (2002) Comparison of wear, wear debris and functional biological activity of moderately crosslinked and non-crosslinked polyethylenes in hip prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 216:111–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Ingham E, Stone MH, Farrar R, Fisher J (2001a) A novel low wearing differential hardness, ceramic-on-metal hip joint prosthesis. J Biomech 34:1291–1298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Firkins PJ, Tipper JL, Saadatzadeh MR, Ingham E, Stone MH, Farrar R, Fisher J (2001b) Quantitative analysis of wear and wear debris from metal-on-metal hip prostheses tested in a physiological hip joint simulator. Biomed Mater Eng 11:143–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fisher J, Hu XQ, Stewart TD et al. (2004a) Wear of surface engineered metal-on-metal hip prostheses. J Mater Sci Mater Med 15:225–235

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fisher J, McEwen HM, Tipper JL, Galvin AL, Ingram J, Kamali A, Stone MH, Ingham E (2004b) Wear, debris, and biologic activity of cross-linked polyethylene in the knee: benefits and potential concerns. Clin Orthop Relat Res 114–119

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fisher J, Jin, Z, Tipper J, Stone M, Ingham E (2006) Tribology of alternative bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Galvin AL, Tipper JL, Jennings LM, Stone MH, Jin ZM, Ingham E, Fisher I (2007) Wear and biological activity of highly crosslinked polyethylene in the hip under low serum protein concentrations. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Geerdink CH, Grimm B, Ramakrishnan R, Rondhuis J, Verbürg AJ, Tonino AJ (2006) Crosslinked polyethylene compared to conventional polyethylene in total hip replacement: pre-clinical evaluation, in-vitro testing and prospective clinical follow-up study. Acta Orthop 77:719–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Geller JA, Malchau H, Bragdon C, Greene M, Harris WH, Freiberg AA (2006) Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene: minimum 3-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Germain MA, Hatton A, Williams S, Matthews JB, Stone MH, Fisher J, Ingham E (2003) Comparison of the cytotoxicity of clinically relevant cobalt-chromium and alumina ceramic wear particles in vitro. Biomaterials 24: 469–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldsmith AA, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Lancaster JG (2000) A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 214:39–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall RM, Siney P, Unsworth A, Wroblewski BM (1998) The association between rates of wear in retrieved acetabular components and the radius of the femoral head. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 212:321–326

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hallab NJ, Anderson S, Caicedo M, Skipor A, Campbell P, Jacobs JJ (2004) Immune responses correlate with serum-metal in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:88–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hart AJ, Hester T, Sinclair K, Powell JJ, Goodship AE, Pele L, Fersht NL, Skinner J (2006) The association between metal ions from hip resurfacing and reduced T-cell counts. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:449–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hasegawa M, Sudo A, Uchida A (2006) Cobalt-chromium head wear following revision hip arthroplasty performed after ceramic fracture a case report. Acta Orthop 77:833–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Head WC (1981) Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:420–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Holley KG, Furman BD, Babalola OM, Lipman JD, Padgett DE, Wright TM (2005) Impingement of acetabular cups in a hip simulator: comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene. J Arthroplasty 20:77–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hornbogen E (2002) Werkstoffe Aufbau und Eigenschaften. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokio

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ingram J, Matthews JB, Tipper J, Stone M, Fisher J, Ingham E (2002) Comparison of the biological activity of grade GUR 1120 and GUR 415HP UHMWPE wear debris. Biomed Mater Eng 12:177–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ, Skipor AK, Urban RM (2003) Metal degradation products: a cause for concern in metalmetal bearings? Clin Orthop Relat Res 139–147

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jin ZM, Meakins S, Morlock MM, Parsons P, Hardaker C, Flett M, Isaac G (2006) Deformation of press-fitted metallic resurfacing cups. Part 1: Experimental simulation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine 220:299–309

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kaddick C, Wimmer MA (2001) Hip simulator wear testing according to the newly introduced standard ISO 14242. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 215:429–442

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kärrholm J, Garellick G, Herberts P (2006) The Swedisch Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual Report 2005. Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  44. Katayama K, Maezawa H, Uesato N, Sasada T (2001) Physicochemical and biomechanical examination of surfaces of retrieved polyethylene heads from total hip prostheses with rotating polyethylene head system. Orthopaedic Science 6:503–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Kempf I, Semlitsch M (1990) Massive wear of a steel ball head by ceramic fragments in the polyethylene acetabular cup after revision of a total hip prosthesis with fractured ceramic ball. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 109:284–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kircher J, Bergschmidt P, Bader R, Kluess D, Besser-Mahuzir E, Leder A, Mittelmeier W (2007) The importance of wear couples for younger endoprosthesis patients. Orthopade 36:337–346

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Kohn D, Pape D (2007) Extensive intrapelvic granuloma formation caused by ceramic fragments after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:293–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T (2006) Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1183–1191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kurtz SM (2004) The UHMWPE Handbook. Elsevier, London

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1487–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ladon D, Doherty A, Newson R, Turner J, Bhamra M, Case CP (2004) Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:78–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee SM, Kinbrum A, Vassiliou K, Unsworth A, Kamali A (2007) Wear of a new 50mm BHR modular head and existing worn acetabular cup in a simulated femoral revision procedure. Conference Proceedings »Engineers & Surgeons: Joined at the hip«. Institution of mechanical Engineers, London, pp 199–202

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Liu F, Jin ZM, Hirt F, Rieker C, Roberts P, Grigoris P (2006a) Transient elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip implant under simulated walking conditions. J Biomechanics 39:905–914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Liu F, Jin Z, Roberts P, Grigoris P (2006b) Importance of head diameter, clearance, and cup wall thickness in elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prostheses. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:695–704

    Google Scholar 

  57. MacDonald SJ, Brodner W, Jacobs JJ (2004) A consensus paper on metal ions in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19:12–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Manning DW, Chiang PP, Martell JM, Galante JO, Harris WH (2005) In vivo comparative wear study of traditional and highly cross-linked polyethylene in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa R, Doorn P, Lu B, Normand P, Grigoris P, Amstutz H (1996) In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 128–S140

    Google Scholar 

  60. Medley JB, Chan FW, Krygier JJ, Bobyn JD (1996) Comparison of alloys and designs in a hip simulator study of metal on metal implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 148–S159

    Google Scholar 

  61. Milosev I, Trebse R, Kovac S, Cor A, Pisot V (2006) Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1173–1182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Morlock MM, Nassutt R, Janßen R, Willmann G, Honl M (2001) Mismatched Wear Couple Zirconium Oxide/Aluminium oxide in Total Hip Replacement: A Case Study. J Arthroplasty 16:1071–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Morlock MM, Bishop N, Ruther W, Delling G, Hahn M (2006) Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:333–344

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Nassutt R, Wimmer MA, Schneider E, Morlock MM (2003) The influence of resting periods on friction in the artificial hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 127–138

    Google Scholar 

  65. Nassutt R, Mollenhauer I, Klingbeil K, Henning O, Grundei H (2006) Relevance of the insertion force for the taper lock reliability of a hip stem and a ceramic femoral head. BiomedTech (Berl) 51:103–109

    Google Scholar 

  66. Oral E, Christensen SD, Malhi AS, Wannomae KK, Muratoglu OK (2006) Wear resistance and mechanical properties of highly cross-linked, ultrahigh-molecular weight polyethylene doped with vitamin E. J Arthroplasty 21:580–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Yang JM, Ahn G, Choi YL (2005) Early osteolysis following second-generation metalon-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1515–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. ParkYS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ (2006) Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:780–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Poggie RA, Turgeon TR, Coutts RD (2007) Failure analysis of a ceramic bearing acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:367–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Prugger C, Keil U (2007) Development of obesity in Germany prevalence, determinants and perspectives. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 132:892–897

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Rasquinha VJ, Ranawat CS, Weiskopf J, Rodriguez JA, Skipor AK, Jacobs JJ (2006) Serum metal levels and bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Rieker CB, Schon R, Kottig P (2004) Development and validation of a second-generation metal-on-metal bearing: laboratory studies and analysis of retrievals. J Arthroplasty 19:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Rieker CB, Schon R, Konrad R, Liebentritt G, Gnepf P, Shen M, Roberts P, Grigoris P (2005) Influence of the clearance on in-vitro tribology of large diameter metal-on-metal articulations pertaining to resurfacing hip implants. Orthop Clin North Am 36:135–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Rohrl S, Nivbrant B, Mingguo L, Hewitt B (2005) In vivo wear and migration of highly cross-linked polyethylene cups a radiostereometry analysis study. J Arthroplasty 20:409–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. vonSalis-Soglio S, Scholz R, Klingbeil K (2004) Zementfreie Hüftpfannen mit metallspongiöser Oberflächenstruktur und Keramik-Polyurethan-Inlay. In: Effenberger H, Zichner L., Richolt J. (Hrsg) Pressfitpfannen. MCU, Salzburg, S 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  76. Santavirta S, Bohler M, Harris WH, Konttinen YT, Lappalainen R, Muratoglu O, Rieker C, Salzer M (2003) Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthop Scand 74:380–388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Schepers A, van der Jagt D, Breckon A, Williams S, Ingham E, Hardaker C, Isaac G, Fisher J (2007) Ceramic-onmetal hip replacements: Part 2 Early clinical metal ion levels. Conference Proceedings »Engineers & Surgeons: Joined at the hip«. Institution of mechanical Engineers, London, pp 101–104

    Google Scholar 

  78. von Schewelov T, Sanzen L, Onsten I, Carlsson A, Besjakov J (2005) Total hip replacement with a zirconium oxide ceramic femoral head: a randomised roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1631–1635

    Google Scholar 

  79. Semlitsch M, Willert HG (1997) Clinical wear behaviour of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene cups paired with metal and ceramic ball heads in comparison to metal-on-metal pairings of hip joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 211:73–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Skipor AK, Campbell PA, Patterson LM, Anstutz HC, Schmalzried TP, Jacobs JJ (2002) Serum and urine metal levels in patients with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. J Mater Sci Mater Med 13:1227–1234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Smith SL, Dowson D, Goldsmith AA (2001) The effect of femoral head diameter upon lubrication and wear of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 215:161–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Squire M, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Peindl RD, Odum S (2006) Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation. J Arthroplasty 21:72–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Urban RM, Tomlinson MJ, Hall DJ, Jacobs JJ (2004) Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:94–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Walter WK (2005) Australian Experience with Ceramic Systems. In: D’Antonio JA, Dietrich M (eds) bioceramics and alternative bearings in joint arthroplasty. Steinkopff, Darmstadt, pp 113–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  85. Walter WL, Insley GM, Walter WK, Tuke MA (2004) Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear. J Arthroplasty 19:402–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Westphal FM, Bishop N, Honl M, Hille E, Püschel K, Morlock MM (2006) Migration and cyclic motion of a new short-stemmed hip prosthesis a biomechanical in vitro study. Clinical Biomechanics 21:834–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Lohmann CH (2000) Histopathologische Veränderungen bei Metall/Metall-Gelenken geben Hinweise auf eine zellvermittelte Überempfindlichkeit. Osteologie 9:2–16

    Google Scholar 

  88. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, Flury R, Windler M, Koster G, Lohmann CH (2005) Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:28–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Williams S, Isaac G, Hatto P, Stone MH, Ingham E, Fisher J (2004) Comparative wear under different conditions of surface-engineered metal-on-metal bearings for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Williams S, Ingham E, Hardaker Cet al. (2007) Ceramic-on metal hip replacements: Part 1-In vitro testing. Conference Proceedings »Engineers & Surgeons: Joined at the hip«. Institution of mechanical Engineers, London, pp 97–100

    Google Scholar 

  91. Willmann G (2000) Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop Relat Res 22–28

    Google Scholar 

  92. Wimmer MA, Nassutt R, Sprecher C, Loos J, Tager G, Fischer A (2006) Investigation on stick phenomena in metal-on-metal hip joints after resting periods. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 220:219–227

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leiter Forschung und Entwicklung, Fa. Peter Brehm GmbH Chirurgie Mechanik, Am Mühlberg 30, 91085, Weisendorf, Deutschland

    Dr. Bernhard Kleffner

  2. Institut für BiomechanikTU Hamburg-Harburg, Denickestr. 15, 21073, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Michael Morlock

Authors
  1. Dr. Bernhard Kleffner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Michael Morlock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Schröder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Siegmund-Freud-Str.25, 53127, Bonn

    Dieter C. Wirtz

  2. St.Franziskus-Hospital Köln Orthopädie, Schönsteinstr.63, 50825, Köln

    Christof Rader

  3. Orthopädische Universitätsklinik am RKU, Oberer Eselsberg 45, 89081, Ulm

    Heiko Reichel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kleffner, B., Morlock, M., Schröder, R. (2008). Werkstoff-und designrelevante Aspekte von Pfannenrevisionsimplantaten. In: Wirtz, D.C., Rader, C., Reichel, H. (eds) Revisionsendoprothetik der Hüftpfanne. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75649-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75649-1_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75648-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75649-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation