Advertisement

Patterns of Binocular Disparity for a Fixating Observer

  • Miles Hansard
  • Radu Horaud
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4729)

Abstract

Binocular information about the structure of a scene is contained in the relative positions of corresponding points in the two views. If the eyes rotate, in order to fixate a different target, then the disparity at a given image location is likely to change. Quite different disparities can be produced at the same location, as the eyes move from one fixation-point to the next. The pointwise variability of the disparity map is problematic for biological visual systems, in which stereopsis is based on simple, short-range mechanisms. It is argued here that the problem can be addressed in two ways; firstly by an appropriate representation of disparity, and secondly by learning the typical pattern of image correspondences. It is shown that the average spatial structure of the disparity field can be estimated, by integrating over a series of binocular fixations. An algorithm based on this idea is tested on natural images. Finally, it is shown how the average pattern of disparities could help to put the images into binocular correspondence.

Keywords

Relative Orientation Reference Plane Binocular Disparity Epipolar Line Epipolar Geometry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cumming, B.G.: An Unexpected Specialization for Horizontal Disparity in Primate Primary Visual Cortex. Nature 418(8), 636–663 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Faugeras, O.: Stratification of 3-d Vision: Projective, Affine, and Metric Representations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 12(3), 465–484 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A Combined Corner and Edge Detector. In: Proc. 4th Alvey Vision Conference, pp. 147–151 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, J., Lee, A.B., Mumford, D.: Statistics of Range Images. In: Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 324–331 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knutsson, H.: Representing Local Structure Using Tensors. In: Proc. 6th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, pp. 244–251 (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mayhew, J.E., Longuet-Higgins, H.C.: A Computational Model of Binocular Depth Perception. Nature 297, 376–378 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohzawa, I., Freeman, R.: Stereoscopic Depth Discrimination in the Visual Cortex: Neurons Ideally Suited as Disparity Detectors. Science 249, 1037–1041 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shashua, A., Navab, N.: Relative Affine Structure: Canonical Model for 3-d from 2-d Geometry and Applications. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 18(9), 873–883 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weinshall, D.: Qualitative Depth from Stereo, with Applications. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 49(2), 222–241 (1990)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miles Hansard
    • 1
  • Radu Horaud
    • 1
  1. 1.INRIA Rhône-Alpes, 655 Avenue de l’Europe, Montbonnot 38330France

Personalised recommendations