Skip to main content

An Algorithm for Conflict Resolution in Regulated Compound Activities

  • Conference paper
Book cover Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII (ESAW 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4457))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The use of norms is a well-known technique of co-ordination in multi-agent systems (MAS) adopted from human societies. A normative position is the “social burden” associated with individual agents, that is, their obligations, permissions and prohibitions. Compound activities may be regulated by means of normative positions. However, conflicts may appear among normative positions of activities and sub-activities. Recently several computational approaches have appeared to make norms operational in MAS but they do not cope with compound activities. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to determine the set of applicable normative positions, i.e., the largest set of normative positions without conflicts in the state of an activity, and propagate them to the sub-activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C.: Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18(2), 191–204 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hannoun, M., Boissier, O., Sichman, J.S., Sayettat, C.: MOISE: An organizational model for multi-agent systems. In: Monard, M.C., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) SBIA 2000 and IBERAMIA 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1952, Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic. PhD thesis, Utrecht University (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yolum, P., Singh, M.: Flexible protocol specification and execution: Applying event calculus planning using commitments. In: AAMAS 2002. Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sergot, M.: A Computational Theory of Normative Positions. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 2(4), 581–622 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pacheco, O., Carmo, J.: A role based model for the normative specification of organized collective agency and agents interaction. Autonomus Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 6, 145–184 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. García-Camino, A., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A., Sierra, C., Vasconcelos, W.: Norm-Oriented Programming of Electronic Institutions: A Rule-based Approach. In: COIN 2006, Coordination, Organization, Institutions and Norms in agent systems in Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2006) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sartor, G.: Normative conflicts in legal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1(2-3), 209–235 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. International Workshop in Deontic Logic in Computer Science: DEON (1991-2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cholvy, L., Cuppens, F.: Solving normative conflicts by merging roles. In: Fifth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Washington, USA (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cholvy, L., Cuppens, F.: Reasoning about norms provided by conflicting regulations. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems. New Studies in Deontic Logic and Computer Science, Washington, USA. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 49, pp. 247–262. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Permission and Obligations in Hierarchical Normative Systems. In: ICAIL 2003. Procs. 8th Int’l Conf. in AI & Law, Edinburgh, ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kollingbaum, M., Norman, T.: Strategies for resolving norm conflict in practical reasoning. In: ECAI Workshop Coordination in Emergent Agent Societies 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Governatori, G.: Representing business contracts in RuleML. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 14(2-3), 181–216 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.A.: Implementing Norms in Electronic Institutions. In: AAMAS 2005. Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Utrecht, The Nederlands, pp. 667–673 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Gregory M. P. O’Hare Alessandro Ricci Michael J. O’Grady Oğuz Dikenelli

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García-Camino, A., Noriega, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, JA. (2007). An Algorithm for Conflict Resolution in Regulated Compound Activities. In: O’Hare, G.M.P., Ricci, A., O’Grady, M.J., Dikenelli, O. (eds) Engineering Societies in the Agents World VII. ESAW 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75524-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75522-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75524-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics