Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation of View-Oriented Parallel Programming on Cluster of Computers

  • Conference paper
High Performance Computing and Communications (HPCC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4782))

  • 907 Accesses

Abstract

View-Oriented Parallel Programming(VOPP) is a novel programming style based on Distributed Shared Memory, which is friendly and easy for programmers to use. In this paper we compare VOPP with two other systems for parallel programming on clusters: LAM/MPI, a message passing system, and TreadMarks, a software distributed shared memory system. We present results for ten applications implemented and optimized using all the three systems. Experimental results demonstrate that VOPP is almost as efficient as Message Passing Interface when running on up to 32 processors, which means there is significant performance improvement compared with TreadMarks. The factors contributing to the performance of VOPP are discussed and analyzed. VOPP is still slower than MPI when the number of processes is large because of extra messages for separate synchronization and lack of bulk transfer mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Keleher, P., Dwarkadas, S., Cox, A.L., Zwaenepoel, W.: TreadMarks: Distributed shared memory on standrd workstations and operating systems. In: Proceedings of the 1994 Winter Usenix Conference, pp. 115–131 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amza, C., Cox, A.L., Dwarkadas, S., Keleher, P., Lu, H., Rajamony, R., Yu, W., Zwaenepoel, W.: TreadMarks: Shared memory computing on networks of workstations. IEEE Computer 29, 18–28 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang, Z., Purvis, M., Werstein, P.: View-Oriented Parallel Programming and View-based Consistenc. In: Proc. of the Fifth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, pp. 505–518 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huang, Z., Purvis, M., Werstein, P.: View-Oriented Update Protocol with Integrated Diff for View-based Consistency. In: Proc. of the IEEE/ACM Symposium on Cluster Computing and Grid (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang, Z., Purvis, M., Werstein, P.: Performance Evaluation of View-Oriented Parallel Programming. In: Proc. of the 2005 International Conference on Parallel Processing, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gropp, W., Lusk, E., Skjellum, A.: A high performance, portable implementation of the MPI message passing interface standar in Parallel Computing, pp. 789–828 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Werstein, P., Pethick, M., Huang, Z.: A Performance Comparison of DSM, PVM and MP. In: Proc. of the Fourth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies, pp. 476–482 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keleher, P.: Lazy Release Consistency for distributed shared memor. In: Ph.D. Thesis (Rice Univ.) (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Klaiber, A.C., Levy, H.M.: A comparison of message passing and shared memory architectures for data parallel language. In: Proc. of the 2th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture, pp. 94–106 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, H., Dwarkadas, S., Cox, A.: Zwaenepoel: Quantifying the performance differences between PVM and TreadMark. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 65–78 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hensgen, F.R., Manber, U.: Two algorithms for barrier synchronizatio. International Journal of Parallel Programming, 1–17 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh, J.P., Webber, W.-D., Gupta, A.: SPLASH: Stanford parallel applications for shared memor. In Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bailey, D., Barton, J., Lasinski, T., Simon, H.: The NAS parallel benchmark. In Technical Report 103863, NASA (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, H., Dwarkadas, S., Cox, A.L., Zwaenepoel, W.: Message Passing versus distributed shared memory on networks of workstation. In: Proc. of SuperComputing 1995 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, Z., Chen, W., Purvis, M., Zheng, W.: VODCA: View-Oriented, Distributed, Cluster-based Approach to parallel computin. In: Proc. of the IEEE/ACM Symposium on Cluster Computing and Grid (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ronald Perrott Barbara M. Chapman Jaspal Subhlok Rodrigo Fernandes de Mello Laurence T. Yang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, W., Zheng, W., Huang, Z. (2007). Performance Evaluation of View-Oriented Parallel Programming on Cluster of Computers. In: Perrott, R., Chapman, B.M., Subhlok, J., de Mello, R.F., Yang, L.T. (eds) High Performance Computing and Communications. HPCC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4782. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75444-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75444-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75443-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75444-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics