Skip to main content

From Crash-Stop to Permanent Omission: Automatic Transformation and Weakest Failure Detectors

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing (DISC 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4731))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of omission failures on asynchronous distributed systems with crash-stop failures. We provide two different transformations for algorithms, failure detectors, and problem specifications, one of which is weakest failure detector preserving. We prove that our transformation of failure detector Ω [1] is the weakest failure detector for consensus in environments with crash-stop and permanent omission failures and a majority of correct processes. Our results help to use the power of the well-understood crash-stop model to automatically derive solutions for the general omission model, which has recently raised interest for being noticeably applicable for security problems in distributed environments equipped with security modules such as smartcards [2,3,4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chandra, T.D., Hadzilacos, V., Toueg, S.: The weakest failure detector for solving consensus. In: Herlihy, M. (ed.) PODC 1992. Proceedings of the 11th Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 147–158. ACM Press, New York (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Fort, M., Freiling, F., Penso, L.D., Benenson, Z., Kesdogan, D.: Trustedpals: Secure multiparty computation implemented with smartcards. In: Gollmann, D., Meier, J., Sabelfeld, A. (eds.) ESORICS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4189, pp. 34–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Freiling, F., Herlihy, M., Penso, L.D.: Optimal randomized omission-tolerant uniform consensus in message passing systems. In: Anderson, J.H., Prencipe, G., Wattenhofer, R. (eds.) OPODIS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3974, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Avoine, G., Gärtner, F.C., Guerraoui, R., Vukolic, M.: Gracefully degrading fair exchange with security modules. In: Dal Cin, M., Kaâniche, M., Pataricza, A. (eds.) EDCC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3463, pp. 55–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hadzilacos, V.: Issues of fault tolerance in concurrent computations (databases, reliability, transactions, agreement protocols, distributed computing). PhD thesis, Harvard University (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Perry, K.J., Toueg, S.: Distributed agreement in the presence of processor and communication faults. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 12(3), 477–482 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4(3), 382–401 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudhuri, S.: Agreement is harder than consensus: set consensus problems in totally asynchronous systems. In: Proceedings of Principles of Distributed Computing 1990 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer, M.J., Lynch, N.A., Paterson, M.S.: Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process. J. ACM 32(2), 374–382 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Chandra, T.D., Toueg, S.: Unreliable failure detectors for reliable distributed systems. Journal of the ACM 43(2), 225–267 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Doudou, A., Garbinato, B., Guerraoui, R., é Schiper, A.: Muteness failure detectors: Specification and implementation. In: Hlavicka, J., Maehle, E., Pataricza, A. (eds.) Dependable Computing - EDDC-3. LNCS, vol. 1667, pp. 71–87. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Freiling, F.C.: Revisiting failure detection and consensus in omission failure environments. In: Van Hung, D., Wirsing, M. (eds.) ICTAC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3722, pp. 394–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Basu, A., Charron-Bost, B., Toueg, S.: Simulating reliable links with unreliable links in the presence of process crashes. In: Babaoğlu, Ö., Marzullo, K. (eds.) WDAG 1996. LNCS, vol. 1151, pp. 105–122. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neiger, G., Toueg, S.: Automatically increasing the fault-tolerance of distributed algorithms. Journal of Algorithms 11(3), 374–419 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Pochon, B.: The perfectly-synchronised round-based model of distributed computing. Information & Computation (to appear, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bazzi, R.A., Neiger, G.: Simulating crash failures with many faulty processors (extended abstract). In: Segall, A., Zaks, S. (eds.) WDAG 1992. LNCS, vol. 647, pp. 166–184. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dolev, D., Friedman, R., Keidar, I., Malkhi, D.: Brief announcement: Failure detectors in omission failure environments. In: Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, p. 286 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Freiling, F., Penso, L.D., Tielmann, A.: Automatic transformations from crash-stop to permanent omission. HAL archives ouvertes, hal-00160626 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Srikanth, T.K., Toueg, S.: Simulating authenticated broadcasts to derive simple fault-tolerant algorithms. Distributed Computing 2(2), 80–94 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Guerraoui, R., Hadzilacos, V., Kouznetsov, P., Toueg, S.: The weakest failure detectors to solve certain fundamental problems in distributed computing. In: PODC 2004. Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing, pp. 338–346. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andrzej Pelc

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delporte-Gallet, C., Fauconnier, H., Freiling, F.C., Penso, L.D., Tielmann, A. (2007). From Crash-Stop to Permanent Omission: Automatic Transformation and Weakest Failure Detectors . In: Pelc, A. (eds) Distributed Computing. DISC 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4731. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75142-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75142-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75141-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75142-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics