Skip to main content

The Effect of Mediated Partnerships in Two-Sided Economic Search

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4676))

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the effect of mediated partnerships over agents’ equilibrium strategies in two-sided economic search. A mediated partnership is formed when an agent acts as a mediator, establishing a partnership between a pair of agents it encountered along its search, thereby reducing the other agents’ amount of search. Surprisingly, this reduction in market friction induced by mediated partnerships does not always improve market efficiency. Use of mediated partnerships changes the equilibrium strategies used by agents in two-sided search models and introduces substantial computational complexity. This computational complexity is overcome with an innovative algorithm that facilitates equilibrium calculation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atakan, A.E.: Assortative matching with explicit search costs. Econometrica 74(3), 667–680 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, G.: A theory of marriage. Journal of Political Economy 81, 813–846 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloch, F., Ryder, H.: Two-sided search, marriages, and matchmakers. International Economic Review 41, 93–115 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burdett, K., Coles, M.G.: Marriage and class. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(1), 141–168 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Burdett, K., Wright, R.: Two-sided search with nontransferable utility. Review of Economic Dynamics 1(1), 220–245 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Chade, H.: Two-sided search and perfect segregation with fixed search costs. Mathematical Social Sciences 42(1), 31–51 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Decker, K., Sycara, K., Williamson, M.: Middle-agents for the internet. In: Proc. of IJCAI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hendrix, P., Grosz, B.: Reputation in the venture games. In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI, Vancouver, Canada (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N.: Fire: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Proceeding of 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 18–22 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Morgan, P.: A model of search, coordination, and market segmentation. SUNY Buffalo, mimeo (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pujol, M., Sanguesa, R., Delgado, J.: Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent sytems: Part 1, pp. 467–474 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, pp. 475–482 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sarne, D., Kraus, S.: Time-variant distributed agent matching applications. In: Proceedings of AAMAS-2004, pp. 168–175. NY (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sen, S., Biswas, A., Debnath, S.: Believing others: Pros and cons. In: ICMAS-2000. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems, p. 279 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sen, S., Dutta, P.: Searching for optimal coalition structures. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Multiagent Systems, July 2000, pp. 286–292 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shehory, O., Kraus, S.: Methods for task allocation via agent coalition formation. Artificial Intelligence Journal 101(1-2), 165–200 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimer, R., Smith, L.: Assortative matching and search. Econometrica 68(2), 343–370 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, I.: Tales of a neglected number. Scientific American 274(6), 102–103 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teacy, W., Patel, J., Jennings, N., Luck, M.: Coping with inaccurate reputation sources: Experimental analysis of a probabilistic trust model. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Joint Conference of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 997–1004 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tsvetovat, N., Sycara, K., Chen, Y., Ying, J.: Customer coalitions in electronic markets. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Cortés, U. (eds.) AMEC III. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2003, pp. 121–138. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamamoto, J., Sycara, K.: A stable and efficient buyer coalition formation scheme for e-marketplaces. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, Canada, pp. 576–583 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zacharia, G., Maes, P.: Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied Artificial Intelligence 14, 881–907 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Matthias Klusch Koen V. Hindriks Mike P. Papazoglou Leon Sterling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hendrix, P., Sarne, D. (2007). The Effect of Mediated Partnerships in Two-Sided Economic Search. In: Klusch, M., Hindriks, K.V., Papazoglou, M.P., Sterling, L. (eds) Cooperative Information Agents XI. CIA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4676. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75119-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75119-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75118-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75119-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics