Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Medizintechnik Life Science Engineering pp 957–981Cite as

Endoskopie, minimal invasive chirurgische und navigierte Verfahren in der Urologie

  • Chapter

  • 18k Accesses

Auszug

Betrachtet man die letzten 100 Jahre der Urologie in Deutschland seit Gründung ihrer Fachgesellschaft 1906 in Stuttgart, so sind sicherlich die letzten 25 Jahre von umfassenden Entwicklungen mit z. T. vollständigen Umwälzungen bisheriger Therapien und Methoden auf urologischen Fachgebiet gekennzeichnet. In erster Linie handelte es sich dabei um minimal invasive endoskopische Techniken wie perkutane Nierenchirurgie, Ureterorenoskopie, videoendoskopisch unterstütze transurethrale Elektroresektionen der Prostata und von Blasentumore sowie die Laparoskopie. Sie führten zu besseren operativen Ergebnissen und einer deutlichen Senkung der Morbidität der entsprechenden Behandlung urologischer Krankheitsbilder, mit der Konsequenz, dass einige bisher als Standard gültige offene Operationsverfahren abgelöst wurden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

42.6 Literatur

  1. Albqami N, Janetschek G. (2006) Indications and contraindications for the use of laparoscopic surgery for renal cell carcinoma. Nat Clin Pract urol 3:32–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bariol SV, Stewart GD, McNeill SA, Tolley DA (2004) Oncological control following laparoscopic nephroureterectomy: 7-year outcome. J Urol: 172: 1805–1808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Desai MM, Gill IS (2005) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumour: current status at the Cleveland Clinic. BJU Int 95[Suppl 2]:41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Janetschek G, Abdelmaksoud A Bagheri F, Al-Zahrani H, Leeb K, Gschwendtner M (2004) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in cold ischemia: renal artery perfusion. J Urol 171: 68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walters RC, Collins MM, L’Esperance JO (2006) Hemostatic techniques during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Curr Opin Urol 16: 327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurczok A, Hamza A, Nill A, Gerbershagen HP, Fornara P (2006) Stellenwert der laparoskopischen Nierenchirurgie in der Urologie. Urologe A 45: 1111–1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rassweiler J, Schulze MM, Marrero R, Frede T, Palou Redorta J, Bassi P (2004) Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: Is it better than open surgery? EurUrol 46: 690–697

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vallancien G, Cathala N, Cathelineau X, Rozet F (2004) Laparoscopic surgery for renal cancers. Bull Acad Natl Med 188:3945

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guazzoni G, Cestari A, Montorsi F, Bellinzoni P, Centemero A, Naspro R, Salonia A, Rigatti P (2004) Laparoscopic treatment of adrenal diseases: 10 years on. BJU Int 93: 221–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McKinlay R, Mastrangelo MJ Jr, Park AE (2003) Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: indications and technique. Curr Surg 60: 145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zacharias M, Haese A, Jurczok A, Stolzenburg JU (2006) Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Outline of the preoperative management, surgical approach and outcome. Eur Urol 49: 448–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM (1993) Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 150: 1795–1799

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Frauscher F (2000) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urol Clin North Am 27: 695–704

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Inagaki T, Rha KH, Ong AM, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (2005) Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Current status. BJU int 95(Suppl 2): 102–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill IS, Ponsky LE, Desai M, Kay R, Ross JH (2001) Laparoscopic cross-trigonal Cohen ureteroneocystostomy: novel technique. J Urol 166: 1811–1814

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nambirajan T, Jeschke S, Albqami N, Abukora F, Leeb K, Janetschek G (2005) Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature. J Endourol 19: 353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Modi P, Goel R, Dodiya S (2005) Laparoscopic ureterocutaneostomy for distal ureteral injuries. Urology 66: 751–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeong BC, Par H, Byeon SS, Kim HH (2006) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for upper ureter stones. J Korean Med Sci 21: 441–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Teber S, Subotic S, Schulze M et al. (2006) Stellenwert der Laparoskopie in der Kinderurologie. Urologe 45: 1145–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee RS, Borer JG (2006) Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Curr Opin Urol 16: 291–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Dayman RV, Kavoussi LR (1997) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experience. Urology 50:854–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Velthoven RFP (2005) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approach: is there an advantage fort he patient? Curr Opin Urol 15: 83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Stolzenburg JU, Truss MC, Rabenalt R, Do M et al. (2004) Die endoskopische extraperitoneale radikale Prostatektomie (EERPE) — Ergebnisse nach 300 Eingriffen, Urologe A 43:698–707

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rassweiler J, Teber D, de la Rosette J, Laguna P, Pansodoro V, Frede T (2006) Laparoskopische Beckenchirurgie. Wo stehen wir im Jahr 2006? Urologe A 45: 1135–1144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Glascock JM (1996) Carbon dioxid homeostasis during transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: a rea-time intraoperative comparison. J Endourol 10: 319–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87: 408–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON et al. (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathological outcmes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur urol 51: 755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P et al. (2002) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic training drills. Urology 60: 39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G (2004) Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. Urol Clin North Am 31: 639–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D, Su LM (2006b) Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy — critical analysis of the results. Eur urol 49: 612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA et al. (2006) Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 1000 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology 68:1275–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA (1992) Laparoscopic cystectomy: Initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 148: 1140–1144

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Puppo P, Perachino M, Ricciotti G et al. (1995) Laparoscopically assisted transvaginal radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 27: 80–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Basillote JB, Abdelshehid C, Ahlering T, Shanberg AM (2004) Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy with ileal neobladder: A comparison with the open approach. J Urol 172: 489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arroyo C, Andrews H, Rozet F et al. (2005) Laparoscopic prostate-sparing radical cystectomy: The Montsouris technique and preliminary results. J endourol 19: 424–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rassweiler J, Tsivian A, Ravi Kumar AV et al. (2003) Oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for urological malignancies:experience with more than 1000 operations. J Urol 169: 2072–2075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sala LG Matsunaga GS, Corica FA, Ornstein DK (2006) Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and totally intracorporal ileal neobladder. J Endourol 20: 233–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Brehmer B, Moll C, Makris A, Knüchel-Clarke R, Jakse G (2007) EndoSewTM: A new device for laparoscopic running sutures. J Endourol (submitted and accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zaak D, Karl A, Knüchel R et al. (2005) Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder using fluorescence endoscopy BJU Int 96(2): 217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Filbeck T, Pichlmeier U et al. (2003) Reducing the risk of superficial bladder cancer recurrence with 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescence diagnosis. Results of a 5-year study. Urologe 42: 1366–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Daniltchenko D, König F, Lankenau E et al. (2006) Anwendung der optischen Kohärenztomographie (OCT) bei der Darstellung von Urothelerkrankungen der Harnblase. Radiologe 46: 584–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Zagaynova EV, Streltsova OS, Gladkova ND et al. (2002) In vivo optical coherence tomography feasibility for bladder disease. J Urol 167: 1492–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hermes, Spöler F, Naami A, Bornemann J, Först M, Grosse J, Jakse G, Knüchel R. Highresolution optical coherence tomography for virtual histology of bladder pathology: a feasibility study. J. Urol., eingereicht Mai 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP et al. (1991) Optical coherence tomography. Science 254, 1178–1181

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Unterhuber A, Povazay B, Bizheva K et al. (2004). Advances in broad bandwidth light sources for ultrahigh resolution optical coherence tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 1235–46

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang ZG, Durand DB, Schoenberg M, Pan YT (2005). Fluorescence guided optical coherence tomography for the diagnosis of early bladder cancer in a rat model. J. Urol. 174, 2376–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Pan YT, Xie TQ, Du CW, et al. (2003) Enhancing early bladder cancer detection with fluorescence-guided endoscopic optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 28, 2485–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Grosse J, Hermes B, Bornemann J, Spöler F, Först M, Jakse G. Bladder tissue differentiation by high-resolution optical coherence tomography. Urology 68, 134 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Faerber GJ, Richardson TD (1997) Long-term results of transurethral collagen injection in men with intrinsic sphincter deficiency. J Endourol 11:273–277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kluthe S, Markendorf R Mali M et al. (1996) Pressure-dependent knight shift in NA and Cs metal. Physical review B Condensed Matter 53: 865–867

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lee PE, Kung RC, Drutz HP (2001) Periurethral autologous fat injection as treatment for female stress urinary incontinence: a randomized double-blind controlled trial

    Google Scholar 

  52. Stanisic TH, Jennings CE, Miller JI (1991) Polytetrafluoroethylene injection for post-prostatectomy incontinence: experience with 20 patients during 3 years. J Urol 146: 1575–1577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bent AE (2004). Sling and Bulking Agent Placement Procedures. Rev Urol 6(Suppl 5): 26–46

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hampel C, Gillitzer R, Wiesner C, Thüroff JW (2007) Etablierte Methoden in der Behandlung der Belastungsinkontinenz des Mannes. Urologe A 46: 244–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chapple CR, Wein AJ, Brubaker L et al. (2005) Review. Stress Incontinence Injection Therapy: What is best for our Patients? Eur Urol 48: 552–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Epstein BJ, Gums JG, Molina E. Newer agents for the management of overactive bladder. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Dec 15;74(12):2061–8. Review

    Google Scholar 

  57. Tiwari A, Naruganahalli KS. Current and emerging investigational medical therapies for the treatment of overactive bladder. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2006 Sep;15(9):1017–37. Review

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Tyagi P, Tyagi S, Kaufman J, Huang L, de Miguel F. Local drug delivery to bladder using technology innovations. Urol Clin North Am. 2006 Nov;33(4):519–30. Review

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Chancellor MB, Costantini E, Porena M. New frontiers in intravesical therapies and drug delivery. Eur Urol. 2006 Dec;50(6):1183–93; discussion 1193. Epub 2006 Aug 30. Review.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Abramov Y, Sand PK. Oxybutynin for treatment of urge urinary incontinence and overactive bladder: an updated review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004 Nov;5(11):2351–9. Review.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Walter P, Grosse J, Bihr AM, Kramer G, Schulz HU, Schwantes U, Stohrer M. Bioavailability of trospium chloride after intravesical instillation in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction: A pilot study. Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18(5):447–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Chancellor MB. Future trends in the treatment of urinary incontinence. Rev Urol. 2001;3Suppl 1:S27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Eroğlu M, Irmak S, Acar A, Denkbaš EB. Design and evaluation of a mucoadhesive therapeutic agent delivery system for postoperative chemotherapy in superficial bladder cancer. Int J Pharm. 2002 Mar 20;235(1–2):51–9.

    Google Scholar 

  64. www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus, U.S. National Library Of Medicine, Eintrag Urinalysis, Urine Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chew BH, Duvdevani M, Denstedt JD. New developments in ureteral stent design, materials and coatings. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2006 May;3(3):395–403. Review.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Riedl CR, Witkowski M, Plas E, Pflueger H. Heparin coating reduces encrustation of ureteral stents: a preliminary report. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jun;19(6):507–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Hölzl F. Entwicklung einer biodegradierbaren Harnleiterschiene — In-vitro Analytik von poly(D,L-Lactid) als Homo-und Copolymer, Formgebungs-Technologie, Oberflächenmodifizierung und tierexperimentelle Untersuchung im Schaf-Modell. Dissertation der medizinischen Fakultät der RWTH Aachen, Mai 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen

    Dr. J. Grosse & Dr. M. von Walter

  2. Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen

    Prof. Dr. G. Jakse

Authors
  1. Dr. J. Grosse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. M. von Walter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. G. Jakse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grosse, J., von Walter, M., Jakse, G. (2008). Endoskopie, minimal invasive chirurgische und navigierte Verfahren in der Urologie. In: Medizintechnik Life Science Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74925-7_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation