Advertisement

Dynamic and Flexible Learning in Distributed and Collaborative Scenarios Using Grid Technologies

  • Andreas Harrer
  • Adam Lucarz
  • Nils Malzahn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4715)

Abstract

This paper presents an architecture for the support of dynamic learning activities and its implementation in the GLIDE prototype. the learning courses are dynamically determined at runtime based on the available tools, devices, and situational context of a learner by using abstract descriptions of learning scenarios and the conceptual mapping of abstract activities to concrete learning support tools This is facilitated by the usage of grid service technology, e-Learning standards, and mechanisms to guarantee semantic interoperability of learning outcomes across various tools and learning activities.

Keywords

Grid Service Learning Resource Grid Technology Semantic Interoperability Learning Scenario 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    de Jong, T., van Joolingen, W.: Discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68, 179–201 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kollar, I., Fischer, F., Slotta, J.D.: Internal and External Collaboration Scripts in Web-based Science Learning at Schools. In: Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2005, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Mawah (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, W.: Web Services in Web-based Education Systems? In: Proc. of Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, ACTA Press (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lorenzo, M.B., Leo, D.H., Dimitriadis, Y., Pérez, A., Sánchez, E.G., Gorgojo, G.V., González, L.V.: Towards Reusability and Tailorability in Collaborative Learning Systems Using IMS-LD and Grid Services. Advanced Technology for Learning 1(3), 129–138 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vega Gorgojo, G., Lorenzo, M.B., Sánchez, E.G., Pérez, J.A., Dimitriadis, Y., Abellán, I.J.: Ontoolcole: an Ontology for the Semantic Search of CSCL Services. In: Dimitriadis, Y.A., Zigurs, I., Gómez-Sánchez, E. (eds.) CRIWG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4154, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The IMS Learning Design Engine [cited 2006 05.02.] (2005), available from http://www.coppercore.org
  7. 7.
    Foster, I.: Globus Toolkit Version 4: Sofware for Service-Oriented Systems. In: IFIP International Conference on Network and Parallel Computing, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    IMS Global Consortium, IMS Learning Design Best Practice and Implementation, I.G. Consortium, Editor (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrer, A., Malzahn, N., Roth, B.: The remote control approach - how to apply scaffolds to existing collaborative learning environments. In: Dimitriadis, Y.A., Zigurs, I., Gómez-Sánchez, E. (eds.) CRIWG 2006. LNCS, vol. 4154, Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Harrer
    • 1
  • Adam Lucarz
    • 1
  • Nils Malzahn
    • 1
  1. 1.Collide Group, University Duisburg-Essen 

Personalised recommendations