Advertisement

Deployment of Ontologies for an Effective Design of Collaborative Learning Scenarios

  • Seiji Isotani
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4715)

Abstract

Two of the most important research subjects during the development of intelligent authoring systems (IAS) for education are the modeling of knowledge and the extraction of knowledge flows from theory to practice. It bridges the gap between theoretical understanding about learning and the practical foundations of design the knowledge of intelligent systems that support the learning process. Developing an IAS for collaborative learning is especially challenging in view of knowledge representation because it is based on various learning theories and given the context of group learning where the synergy among the learner’s interactions affect the learning processes and hence, the learning outcome. The main objective of this work is to introduce an ontological infrastructure on which we can build a model that describes learning theories and to show how we can use it to develop programs that provide intelligent guidance to support group activities based on well-grounded theoretical knowledge.

Keywords

Collaborative learning design ontological engineering knowledge representation intelligent authoring system learning theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson, J.R.: Acquisition of Cognitive Skill. Psychological Review 89(4), 369–406 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Collaborative Ontological Engineering of Instructional Design Knowledge for an ITS Authoring Environment. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardéres, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 399–409. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins, A.: Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. Educational values and cognitive instruction, LEA, pp. 121–138 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt: Anchored instruction in science education. Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice, pp. 244–273, Albany, NY, SUNY Press (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devedzic, V.: Understanding Ontological Engineering. Communications of the ACM 45(4), 136–144 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devedzic, V.: Web Intelligence and Artificial Intelligence in Education. Educational Technology & Society 7(4), 29–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by Collaborative Learning, Collaborative Learning and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19. Elsevier Science, Oxford (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Endlsey, W.R.: Peer tutorial instruction. Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayashi, Y., Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Ontological Modeling Approach to Blending Theories for Instructional and Learning Design. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Computers in Education. vol. 151, pp. 37–44 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Inaba, A., Ohkubo, R., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: Models and Vocabulary to Represent Learner-to-Learner Interaction Process in Collaborative Learning. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 1088–1096. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003a)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R.: What Learning Patterns are Effective for a Learner Growth? In: Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 219–226. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003b)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Inaba, A., Supnithi, T., Ikeda, M., Mizoguchi, R., Toyoda, J.: How Can We Form Effective Collaborative Learning Groups? In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 282–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isotani, S., Mizoguchi, R.: A Framework for Fine-Grained Analysis and Design of Group Learning Activities. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Computers in Education, vol. 151, pp. 193–200 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mizoguchi, R., Bourdeau, J.: Using Ontological Engineering to Overcome AI-ED Problems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 11(2), 107–121 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mizoguchi, R.: Tutorial on Ontological Engineering - Part 1. New Generation Computing 21(4), 365–384 (2003)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Norman, D.A.: Accretion, Tuning, and Restructuring: Modes of Learning, Semantic factors in cognition, LEA, pp. 37–53 (1978)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salomon, G.: Distributed Cognitions. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Spiro, R.J., Coulson, R.L., Feltovich, P.J., Anderson, D.K.: Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In: annual conference of the cognitive science society, pp. 375–383. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (1988)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Supnithi, T., Inaba, A., Ikeda, M., Toyoda, J., Mizoguchi, R.: Learning Goal Ontology Supported by Learning Theories for Opportunistic Group Formation. In: Proceedings of the Int. Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 67–74. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seiji Isotani
    • 1
  • Riichiro Mizoguchi
    • 1
  1. 1.The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, 8-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka, 565-0047Japan

Personalised recommendations