Skip to main content

Effects of Geometry, Landmarks and Orientation Strategies in the ‘Drop-Off’ Orientation Task

  • Conference paper
Spatial Information Theory (COSIT 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4736))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Previous work is reviewed and an experiment described to examine the spatial and strategic cognitive factors impacting on human orientation in the ‘drop-off’ static orientation scenario, where a person is matching a scene to a map to establish directional correspondence. The relative roles of salient landmarks and scene content and geometry, including space syntax isovist measures, are explored both in terms of general effects, individual differences between participant strategies, and the apparent cognitive processes involved. In general people tend to be distracted by salient 3D landmarks even when they know these will not be detectable on the map, but benefit from a salient 2D landmark whose geometry is present in both images. However, cluster analysis demonstrated clear variations in strategy and in the relative roles of the geometry and content of the scene. Results are discussed in the context of improving future geographic information content.

© Crown copyright 2007. Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Robinson, A., Petchenik, B.: The Nature of Maps: Essays towards understanding maps and mapping. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Montello, D.R., Freundschuh, S.: Cognition of geographic information. In: McMaster, R.B., Usery, E.L. (eds.) A research agenda for geographic information science, pp. 61–91. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thompson, W.B., Pick, H.L., Bennett, B.H., Heinrichs, M.R., Savitt, S.L., Smith, K.: Map based localization: The ‘drop-off’ problem. In: Proceedings of the DARPA Image Understanding Workshop, pp. 706–719 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pick, H.L., Heinrichs, M.R., Montello, D.R., Smith, K., Sullivan, C.N.: Topographic map reading. In: Hancock, P.A., Flach, J., Caird, J., Vicente, K. (eds.) Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems, vol. 2, pp. 255–284. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Levine, M.: You-are-here maps: Psychological considerations. Environment and Behavior 14, 221–237 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Klippel, A., Freksa, C., Winter, S.: You-are-here maps in emergencies – the danger of getting lost. Journal of Spatial Science 51, 117–131 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Griffin, T.L.C., Lock, B.F.: The perceptual problem of contour interpretation. The Cartographic Journal 16, 61–71 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eley, M.G.: Determining the shapes of land surfaces from topographical maps. Ergonomics 31, 355–376 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aretz, A.: Spatial cognition and navigation. In: Perspectives: Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, Human Factors Society, pp. 8–12 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harwood, K.: Cognitive perspectives on map displays for helicopter flight. In: Perspectives: Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA, Human Factors Society, pp. 13–17 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wickens, C.D., Prevett, T.T.: Exploring the dimensions of egocentricity in aircraft navigation displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1, 110–135 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gunzelmann, G., Anderson, J.R., Douglass, S.: Orientation tasks with multiple views of space: Strategies and performance. Spatial Cognition and Computation 4, 209–256 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Warren, D.H., Rossano, M.J., Wear, T.D.: Perception of map-environment correspondence: The roles of features and alignment. Ecological Psychology 2, 131–150 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Blades, M., Spencer, C.: The development of 3- to 6-year-olds’ map using ability: The relative importance of landmarks and map alignment. Journal of Genetic Psychology 151, 181–194 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hagen, M.A., Giorgi, R.: Where’s the camera? Ecological Psychology 5, 65–84 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Presson, C.C.: The development of map-reading skills. Child Development 53, 196–199 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Meilinger, T., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S.J., Brösamle, M.: How much information do you need? Schematic maps in wayfinding and self localization. In: Spatial Cognition 2006, Bremen, Germany, Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bryant, K.J.: Geographical spatial orientation ability within real-world and simulated large-scale environments. Multivariate Behavioral Research 26, 109–136 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunzelmann, G., Anderson, J.R.: Location matters: Why target location impacts performance in orientation tasks. Memory and Cognition 34, 41–59 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davies, C.: When is a map not a map? Task and language in spatial interpretations with digital map displays. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16, 273–285 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hermer, L., Spelke, E.S.: A geometric process for spatial reorientation in young children. Nature 370, 57–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lansdale, M.: Modelling memory for absolute location. Psychological Review 105, 351–378 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cheng, K., Newcombe, N.S.: Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 1–23 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Winter, S.: Route adaptive selection of salient features. In: Kuhn, W., Worboys, M.F., Timpf, S. (eds.) COSIT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2825, pp. 349–361. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shepard, R.N., Hurwitz, S.: Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition 18, 161–193 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Benedikt, M.L.: To take hold of space: Isovist and isovist fields. Environment And Planning B: Planning & Design 6, 47–65 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Conroy-Dalton, R.: Spatial navigation in immersive virtual environments. PhD thesis, University of London, London (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wiener, J.M., Franz, G.: Isovists as means to predict spatial experience and behaviour. In: Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction, pp. 42–57. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Conroy-Dalton, R., Bafna, S.: The syntactical image of the city: A reciprocal definition of spatial elements and spatial syntaxes. In: 4th International Space Syntax Symposium, London, UK (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hintzman, D.L., O’Dell, C.S., Arndt, D.R.: Orientation in cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology 13, 149–206 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Davies, C., Mora, R., Peebles, D.: Isovists for orientation: Can space syntax help us predict directional confusion? In: Proceedings of the Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition workshop, Spatial Cognition 2006, Bremen, Germany (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ward, J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236–244 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E.: Pattern classification and scene analysis. Wiley, New York (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Gombrich, E.H.: The image and the eye: Further studies in the psychology of pictorial representation. Phaidon Press, London (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Smallman, H.S., John, M.S., Oonk, H.M., Cowen, M.B.: When beauty is only skin deep: 3D realistic icons are harder to identify than conventional 2D military symbols. In: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 480–483 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Stephan Winter Matt Duckham Lars Kulik Ben Kuipers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Peebles, D., Davies, C., Mora, R. (2007). Effects of Geometry, Landmarks and Orientation Strategies in the ‘Drop-Off’ Orientation Task. In: Winter, S., Duckham, M., Kulik, L., Kuipers, B. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4736. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74788-8_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74786-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74788-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics