Skip to main content

Deadline and Throughput-Aware Control for Request Processing Systems

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4742))

Abstract

Congestion Control is a necessary tool in Transaction Processing Systems (TPS), to avoid excessive degradation of response times. But it should have an autonomic behavior, adapting automatically to request characteristics to deliver the best possible service. Given that every request has either explicit or implicit deadlines (maximum acceptable response times), we analyze strategies that target request deadlines and throughput. These include maximum throughput seeker strategies, strategies using feedback control on miss rate and an additional proposal for preventive control of miss rates and throughput. Another goal of our proposal is for the control to be external and it should not rely on analytic models for control (because the predictions may be erroneous due to physical system issues). We analyze and compare alternative designs for the control including our own proposals and related ones. Our experiments consider both varied request inter-arrival and duration distributions and a real transaction processing benchmark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, R., Garcia-Molina, H.: Scheduling Real-Time Requests: A Performance Evaluation. ACM Trans. Database System 17, 513–560 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bennani.: Autonomic Computing Through Analytic Performance Models. Ph.D in CS dissertation, George Mason University (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhatti, N., Friedrich, R.: Web server support for tiered services. IEEE Network 13(5), 64–71 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhoj, Rmanathan, Singhal.: Web2K: Bringing QoS to Web servers. Tech. Rep. HPL-2000-61, HP Labs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, X., Mohapatra, P., Chen, H.: An admission control scheme for predictable server response time forWeb accesses. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Wide Web Conference, Hong Kong (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cherkasova, P.: Session-based admission control: A mechanism for peak load management of commercial Web sites. IEEE Req. on Computers 51(6) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Elnikety, S., Nahum, E., Tracey, J., Zwaenepoel, W.: A Method for Transparent Admission Control and Request Scheduling in E-Commerce Web Sites. In: WWW 2004. The Thirteenth International World Wide Web Conference, New York City, NY, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kang, K.D., Son, S.H., Stankovic, J.A.: Managing Deadline Miss Ratio and Sensor Data Freshness in Real-Time Databases. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16(10), 1200–1216 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang, K.D.: QoS-Aware Real-Time Data Management. PhD thesis, U. of Virginia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kang, K.D., Son, S.H., Stankovic, J.A., Abdelzaher, T.F.: A QoSSensitive Approach for Timeliness and Freshness Guarantees in Real-Time Databases. In: Proc. 14th Euromicro Conf. Real-Time Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haritsa, J., Livny, Carey, M.: Earliest Deadline Scheduling for Real-Time Database Systems. In: Proc. IEEE Real-Time Syst. Symp., pp. 232–242. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanodia, V., Knightly, E.W.: Ensuring latency targets in multiclass Web servers. IEEE Requests on Parallel and Distributed Systems 13(10) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Krishna, C., Shin, K.: Real-Time Systems. McGraw-Hill, New York (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu, C., Stankovic, J., Tao, G., Son, S.: Feedback Control Real-Time Scheduling: Framework, Modeling and Algorithms, special issue of Real-Time Systems. Journal on Control-Theoretic Approaches to Real-Time Computing 23, 85–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Menasce, B.: On the Use of Performance Models to Design Self-Managing Computer Systems. In: Proc. 2003 Comp. Measur. Group Conf. Dallas, TX (December 7-12, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mogul, J.C., Ramakrishnan, K.K.: Eliminating receive livelock in an interrupt-driven kernel. ACM Requests on Computer Systems 15(3), 217–252 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pang, H., Livny, M., Carey, M.: Transaction Scheduling in Multiclass Real-Time Database Systems. In: Proc. IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, pp. 22–34. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pradhan, P., Tewari, R., Sahu, S., Chandra, A., Shenoy, P.: An observation-based approach towards self managing Web servers. In: International Workshop on Quality of Service, Miami Beach, FL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schroeder, Mor Harchol-Balter, Iyengar, Nahum, Wierman: How to determine a good multi-programming level for external scheduling. In: 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stankovic, J., Lu, C., Son, S., Tao, G.: The Case for Feedback Control Real-Time Scheduling. In: EuroMicro Conference on Real-Time Systems (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. TPCC, http://www.tpc.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ivan Stojmenovic Ruppa K. Thulasiram Laurence T. Yang Weijia Jia Minyi Guo Rodrigo Fernandes de Mello

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Furtado, P., Antunes, R. (2007). Deadline and Throughput-Aware Control for Request Processing Systems. In: Stojmenovic, I., Thulasiram, R.K., Yang, L.T., Jia, W., Guo, M., de Mello, R.F. (eds) Parallel and Distributed Processing and Applications. ISPA 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4742. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74742-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74742-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74741-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74742-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics