Abstract
An important issue in relation to fiscal policy is to strike a balance between “stabilisation” and “sustainability”. The aim of this paper is to discuss what we consider to be the consensus view on fiscal policy design which seems to have emerged in recent years. This view has two pillars. First, automatic stabilisers should be allowed to work since they are rule based, whereas discretionary policies should only be allowed in exceptional cases. The motivation for this “escape clause only” is that if a more flexible use of discretion is allowed for in the conduct of fiscal policy, it could easily lead to a deficit bias. Second, the structural balance should, “on average” over the business cycle, be in balance or surplus. For example, the Stability and Growth Pact stresses the need to ensure “a medium-term budgetary position of close to balance or in surplus”, and in Sweden the fiscal policy framework has been formulated with a requirement of ensuring a given budget surplus (currently 2 % of GDP) on average over the business cycle. Ideally, this type of policy design would guarantee not only that fiscal policy can be used for stabilisation purposes but also that fiscal sustainability problems can be avoided.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andersen TM (2005) The role for an active stabilization policy. CESifo Economic Studies 51:511–457
Andersen TM, Dogonowski R (2002) Social insurance and the policy budget. Economica 69:415–432
Hughes Hallett A, Jensen SH (2003) On the role of labour market reform for the enlargement of a monetary union. CESifo Economic Studies 49:355–379
Hughes Hallett A, Jensen SH (2006) Revising the economic policy framework in the European Union: Is there a need for further co-ordination? Policy report. Forum Europa, Copenhagen
Noord VD (2000) The size and role of automatic stabilizers in the 1990s and beyond. OECD Economics Department Working Papers no. 230. OECD, Paris
Varian H (1980) Redistributive taxation as social insurance. Journal of Public Economics 14:49–68
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andersen, T.M., Hougaard Jensen, S.E. (2008). Automatic Stabilisers and Budget Rules. In: Neck, R., Richter, C., Mooslechner, P. (eds) Quantitative Economic Policy. Advances in Computational Economics, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74684-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74684-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74683-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74684-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)