Advertisement

Robust and Efficient Multi-objective Automatic Adjustment for Optical Axes in Laser Systems Using Stochastic Binary Search Algorithm

  • Nobuharu Murata
  • Hirokazu Nosato
  • Tatsumi Furuya
  • Masahiro Murakawa
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4684)

Abstract

The adjustment of optical axes is crucial for laser systems. We have previously proposed an automatic adjustment method using genetic algorithms to adjust the optical axes. However, there were still two problems that needed to be solved: (1)long adjustment times, and (2)adjustment precision due to observation noise. In order to solve these tasks, we propose a robust and efficient automatic multi-objective adjustment method using stochastic binary search algorithm. Adjustment experiments for optical axes with 4-DOF in noisy environment demonstrate that the proposed method can robustly adjust the positioning and the angle of the optical axes in about 12 minutes.

Keywords

optical axes automatic adjustment stochastic binary search multi-objective optimization noisy environment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Murakawa, M., Itatani, T., Kasai, Y., Yoshikawa, H., Higuchi, T.: An evolvable laser system for generating femtosecond pulses. In: GECCO 2000. Proceedings of the Second Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 636–642 (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nosato, H., Kasai, Y., Murakawa, M., Itatani, T., Higuchi, T.: Automatic adjustments of a femtosecond-pulses laser using genetic algorithms. In: CEC 2003. Proceedings of 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2096–2101 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murata, N., Nosato, H., Furuya, T., Murakawa, M.: An automatic multi-objective adjustment system for optical axes using genetic algorithms. In: ISDA 2005. Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 546–551 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murata, N., Nosato, H., Furuya, T., Murakawa, M.: Robust and efficient automatic adjustment for optical axes in laser systems using binary search algorithm for noisy environments. In: ICARA 2006. Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents, pp. 261–266 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes, E.J.: Multi-objective binary search optimisation. In: Fonseca, C.M., Fleming, P.J., Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L. (eds.) EMO 2003. LNCS, vol. 2632, pp. 102–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fitzpatrick, J.M., Greffenstette, J.J.: Genetic algorithms in noisy environments. Machine Learning 3, 101–120 (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stagge, P.: Averaging efficiently in the presence of noise. In: PPSN V. Proceedings of Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, pp. 188–197 (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watanabe, S., Hiroyasu, T., Miki, M.: Neighborhood Cultivation Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. In: SEAL 2002. Proceedings of the 4th Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning, vol. 1, pp. 198–202 (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knowles, J., Thiele, L., Zitzler, E.: A tutorial oh the performance assessment of stochastic multiobjective optimizers. Report of Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK) (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nobuharu Murata
    • 1
  • Hirokazu Nosato
    • 2
  • Tatsumi Furuya
    • 1
  • Masahiro Murakawa
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Toho University, 2-2-1 Miyama, Funabashi, ChibaJapan
  2. 2.National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations