The electronic band structures of GaN x As1−x alloys are examined within the density functional theory. The calculations, including structural optimizations, are performed by means of full-potential linear muffin-tin-orbital and pseudopotential methods. The effects of applying external pressure and of varying the composition, x, are examined.
The host conduction states near X and L in the Brillouin zone are modified by addition of N. Their interaction with the lowest conduction bands induce a pronounced nonparabolicity of this band and affect strongly the value of the effective electron mass and its pressure and composition dependences. The origin of the additional E + optical transition is elucidated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, K.M. Yu, W. Shan, J.W. Ager III, E.E. Haller, L.U Hai, W.W. Schaff, W.K. Metzger, S.R. Kurtz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 6477 (2003)
M.A. Wistley, S.R. Bank, H.B. Yuen, L.L. Goddard, J.S. Harris, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 22, 1562 (2004)
P. Perlin, I. Gorczyca, T. Suski, P. Wisniewski, S. Lepkowski, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, M. Hansen, S.P. DenBaars, B. Damilano, N. Grandjean, J. Massies, Phys. Rev. B 64, 115319 (2001)
K.M. Yu, W. Walukiewicz, J. Wu, W. Shan, J.W. Beeman, M.A. Scarpula, O.D. Dubon, P. Becla, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246403 (2003)
D.J. Wolford, J.A. Bradley, K. Fry, J. Thompson, in Physics of Semiconductors, ed. by J.D. Chadi, J.D. Harrison (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1984), p. 627
X. Liu, M.E. Pistol, L. Samuelson, S. Schwetlick, W. Seifert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1451 (1990)
J. Leymarie, M. Leroux, G. Neu, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 4, 235 (1988)
T. Mattila, S.H. Wei, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 60, 11245 (1999)
W.G. Bi, C.W. Tu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 1608 (1997)
U. Tisch, E. Finkman, J. Salzman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 463 (2002)
M. Weyers, M. Sato, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 31, L853 (1992)
M. Kondow, K. Uomi, K. Hosomi, T. Mozume, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Part 2 33, L1056 (1994)
W. Shan, W. Walukiewicz, J.W. Ager III, E.E. Haller, J.F. Geisz, D.J. Friedman, J.M. Olson, S.R. Kurtz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1221 (1999)
S.R. Perkins, A. Mascarenhas, Y. Zhang, J.F. Geisz, J.F. Friedman, J.F. Olson, S.R. Kurtz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3312 (1999)
E.D. Jones, N.A. Modine, A.A. Allerman, S.R. Kurtz, A.F. Wright, S.T. Tozer, X. Wei, Phys. Rev. B 60, 4430 (1999)
C. Skierbiszewski, P. Perlin, P. Wisniewski, W. Knap, T. Suski, W. Walukiewicz, W. Shan, K.M. Yu, J.V. Ager III, E.E. Haller, J.F. Geisz, J.M. Olson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2409 (2000)
H.M. Cheong, Y. Zhang, A. Mascarenhas, J.F. Geisz, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13687 (2000)
P.J. Klar, H. Grüning, W. Heimbrodt, J. Koch, F. Höhnsdorf, W. Stolz, P.M.A. Vicente, J. Camassel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3439 (2000)
W. Shan, W. Walukiewicz, K.M. Yu, J.V. Ager III, E.E. Haller, J.F. Geisz, D.J. Friedman, J.M. Olson, S.R. Kurtz, C. Nauka, Phys. Rev. B 62, 4211 (2000)
P. Perlin, S.G. Subramanya, D.E. Mars, J. Kruger, N.A. Shapiro, H. Siegle, E.R. Weber, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73: 3703 (1998)
C. Skierbiszewski, P. Perlin, P. Wisniewski, T. Suski, J.F. Geisz, K. Hingerl, W. Jantsch, D. Mars, W. Walukiewicz, Phys. Rev. B 65, 35207 (2002)
M. Kondow, T. Kitatani, M.C. Larson, K. Nakahara, K. Uomi, H. Inoue J. Cryst. Growth 188, 255 (1998)
I.A. Buyanova, W.M. Chen, B. Monemar, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 6, 2 (2001)
J. Endicot, A. Patane, D. Maude, L. Eaves, M. Hopkinson, G. Hill, Phys. Rev. B 72, 041306(R) (2005)
A. Lindsay, E.P. O’Reilly, Solid State Commun. 112, 443 (1999)
N.G. Szwacki, P. Boguslawski, Phys. Rev. B 64, 161201 (2001)
A. Zunger, Phys. Stat. Sol. b 216, 117 (1999)
G. Bentoumi, V. Timoschevskii, N. Madini, M. Cote, R. Leonelli, J.N. Beaudry, P. Desjardins, R.A. Masut, Phys. Rev. B 70, 35315 (2004)
I. Gorczyca, C. Skierbiszewski, T. Suski, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, Phys. Rev. B 66, 081106 (2002)
N.G. Szwacki, P. Boguslawski, I. Gorczyca, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, Acta Phys. Pol. A 102, 633 (2002)
N.E. Christensen, I. Gorczyca, A. Svane, N.G. Szwacki, P. Boguslawski, Phys. Stat. Sol. b 235, 374 (2003)
I. Gorczyca, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, Solid State Commun. 136, 439 (2005)
I. Gorczyca, N.E. Christensen, A. Svane, Phys. Stat. Sol. b 234, 1599 (2006)
R.O. Jones, O. Gunnarsson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 681 (1989) and references therein
J.P. Perdew, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048 (1981)
D.M. Ceperley, B.J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980)
R. Car, M. Parrinello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2471 (1985)
C. Wang, Q.M. Zhang, J. Bernholc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 3789 (1992)
G.B. Bachelet, D.R. Hamann, M. Schlüter, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4199 (1982)
O.K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975)
M. Methfessel, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1537 (1988)
M. Methfessel, C.O. Rodriguez, O.K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2009 (1989)
M. Van Schilfgaarde, private communication
D.L. Novikov, private communication, and N.E. Christensen, D.L. Novikov, Solid State Commun. 119, 477 (2001) and references therein
D. Singh, Phys. Rev. B 43, 6388 (1991)
D. Glötzel, B. Segal, O.K. Andersen, Solid State Commun. 36 403 (1980)
N.E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 30, 5753 (1984)
N.E. Christensen, in High Pressure in Semiconductor Physics I, ed. by T. Suski, W. Paul and Semiconductors and Semimetals V, vol. 54, ed. by R.K. Willardson, E.R. Weber (Academic Press, New York, 1998), p. 49
N.E. Christensen, I. Gorczyca, Phys. Rev. B 50, 4397 (1994)
I. Gorczyca, A. Svane, N.E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. B 60, 8147 (1999)
J.F. Muth, J.H. Lee, I.K. Shmagin, R.M. Kolbas, H.C. Casey, B.P. Keller, U.K. Mishira, S.P. Den Baars, Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2572 (1997)
L. Hedin, S. Lundqvist, Solid State Phys. 23, 1 (1969)
M.S. Hybertsen, S.G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 34,: 5390 (1986)
M. Rohlfing, S.G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1959 (1999)
P. Puschnig, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 056405 (2002)
R. Laskowski, N.E. Christensen, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, Phys. Rev. B 72, 035204 (2005)
M. Alouani, S. Gopalan, S. Garriga, N.E. Christensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1643 (1988)
I. Gorczyca, N.E. Christensen, M. Alouani, Phys. Rev. B 39, 7705 (1989)
In fact we did try to use adjusting potentials which reproduce the value of the direct gap at Γ in GaN, but the lack of experimental data for the gaps at L and X made the adjustment at the points poorer. The results obtained for GaN x As1−x in this way differed insignificantly from the calculations with GaAs parameters throughout the supercell, the choice described in the main text
J.S. Blakemore, J. Appl. Phys. 53, R123 (1982)
K.C. Hass, H. Ehrenreich, B. Velický, Phys. Rev. B 27, 1088 (1983)
J. Kudrnovský, V. Drchal, J. Mašek, Phys. Rev. B 35, 2487 (1987)
J. Kudrnovský, V. Drchal, M. Šob, N.E. Christensen, O.K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 40, 10029 (1989)
P. Bogusławski, I. Gorczyca, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 9, 2169 (1994)
W. Shan, W. Walukiewicz, J.W. Ager III, E.E. Haller, J.F. Geisz, D.J. Friedman, J.M. Olson, S.R. Kurtz, J. Appl. Phys. 86, 2349 (1999)
P. Bogusławski, A. Baldereschi, Solid Stat. Commun. 66, 679 (1988); Phys. Rev. B 39, 8055 (1989)
L. Bellaiche, S.H. Wei, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B 54, 17568 (1996)
A. Al-Yacoub, L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. B 62, 10847 (2000)
T. Morgan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 819 (1968)
C. Skierbiszewski, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 17, 803 (2002)
H.P. Hjalmarson, P. Vogl, D.J. Wolford, J.D. Dow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 810 (1980)
W. Lin-Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 256402 (2002)
M. Cardona, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 1543 (1963); ibid. 26, 1351 (1965) (Erratum)
N. Shtinkov, P. Desjardins, R.A. Masut, Phys. Rev. B 67, 81202 (2003)
Y. Zhang, A. Mascarenhas, H.P. Xin, C.W. Tu, Phys. Rev. B 61, 7479 (2000)
J. Hader, S. Koch, J.V. Moloney, E.P. O’Reilly, Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 3685 (2000)
E.P. O’Reilly, A. Lindsay, S. Tomic, P.J. Klar, Phys. Stat. Sol. B 241, 3099 (2004)
P.N. Hai, W.M. Chen, I.A. Buyanova, H.P. Xin, C.W. Tu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1843 (2000)
F. Masia, A. Polimeni, G. Baldassarri Höger von Högersthal, M. Bissiri, M. Capizzi, P.J. Klar, W. Stolz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4474 (2003)
C. Skierbiszewski, J. Lusakowski, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 16, S3319 (2004)
Y.J. Wang, X. Wei, Y. Zhang, A. Mascarenhas, H.P. Xin, Y.G. Hong, C.W. Tu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 4453 (2003)
J. Toivonen, T. Hakkarainen, M. Sopanen, H. Lipsanen, J. Crys. Growth 221, 456 (2000)
P.R.C Kent, A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2613 (2001)
P.R.C Kent, A. Zunger, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 559 (2003)
W.G. Spitzer, H.Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. 106, 882 (1957)
The experimental values for the k-dependence of the effective mass in the CB are usually obtained by a combination of Hall effect and infrared reflectivity measurements. In the analysis of the data a Fermi radius is deduced from the electron concentration obtained in the Hall measurement by application of a free-electron like relation between density and Fermi radius. Thus, it is implicitly assumed that the sample has been heavily doped, and that the doping levels are above the CB minimum, so that the electron gas is degenerate (metal, in fact). See also: ref. 87
M. Corti, A. Gabetta, M. Fanciulli, A. Svane, N.E. Christensen Phys. Rev. B 67, 064416 (2003)
R.K. Willardson, A.C. Beer (eds.), Semiconductors and Semimetals, V 8 (Academic Press, New York, 1972)
R.K. Willardson, A.C. Beer (eds.), Semiconductors and Semimetals, V 12 (Academic Press, New York, 1977)
M. Cardona, Phys. Rev. 121, 752 (1961)
H. Piller, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. Suppl. 21, 206 and [88], p. 103 (1966)
G.E. Stillman, C.M. Wolfe, J.O. Dimmock, in [89], p. 169
A. Raymond, J.L. Robert, C. Bernard, J. Phys. C 12, 2289 (1979)
P. Perlin, E. Litwin-Staszewska, B. Suchanek, W. Knap, J. Camassel, T. Suski, R. Piotrzkowski, I. Grzegory, S. Porowski, E. Kaminska, J.C. Chervin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 1114 (1996)
For GaAs ε(∞) = 10.9 (see for example [96], p. 337), but it is maybe not obvious that this is relevant to the case of GaN x As1−x . However, if only rather small nitrogen concentrations are considered the screening of the electron system caused by the ions may not be significantly different from that of pure GaAs. Thus the value used in the analyses made by Skierbiszewski et al. was ε(∞) = 10.9, [97]. The argument for using the dielectric constant for the semiconductor host, although the “free carriers” created by the doping is that the electron concentrations are low, ≈1019 cm−3, compared to the density of ions
P.Y. Yu, M. Cardona, Fundamentals of Semiconductors, 3rd edn. (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 2001)
C. Skierbiszewski, private communication
E.D. Jones, N.A. Modine, A.A. Allerman, I.J. Fritz, S.R. Kurtz, A.F. Wright, S.T. Torez, X. Wei, Proc. SPIE 3621, 52 (1999)
P.H. Tan, X.D. Luo, Z.Y. Xu, Y. Zhang, A. Mascarenhas, H.P. Xin, C.W. Tu, W.K. Ge, Phys. Rev. B 73, 205205 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gorczyca, I., Boguslawski, P., Svane, A., Christensen, N.E. (2008). Electronic Structure of GaNxAs1−x Under Pressure. In: Erol, A. (eds) Dilute III-V Nitride Semiconductors and Material Systems. Materials Science, vol 105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74529-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74529-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74528-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74529-7
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)