Cooperative Data Management for XML Data

  • Katja Hose
  • Kai-Uwe Sattler
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4653)


Emerging non-standard applications like the production of high-quality spatial sound pose new challenges to data management. Beside the need for a flexible transactional management of complex hierarchical scene descriptions a main requirement is the support of cooperative processes allowing a group of authors to edit a scene together in a distributed environment. Based on previous work on cooperative and non-standard transactions we present in this paper a transaction model and protocol for XML databases addressing this issues.


Transaction Model Global Transaction Nest Transaction Registered Client Exclusive Lock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Heimrich, T., Reichelt, K., Rusch, H., Sattler, K., Schröder, T.: Modelling and streaming spatiotemporal audio data. In: OTM Workshops, pp. 7–8 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernstein, P.A., Hadzilacos, V., Goodman, N.: Concurrency Control and Recovery in Database Systems. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, London (1987)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silberschatz, A., Kedem, Z.: Consistency in hierarchical database systems. Journal of the ACM 27, 72–80 (1980)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Härder, T., Rothermel, K.: Concepts for transaction recovery in nested transactions. In: SIGMOD 1987, pp. 239–248 (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moss, J.E.: Nested transactions: an approach to reliable distributed computing. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weikum, G.: Principles and realization strategies of multilevel transaction management. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 16, 132–180 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weikum, G., Schek, H.J.: Concepts and applications of multilevel transactions and open nested transactions. Database transaction models for advanced applications, 515–553 (1992)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garcia-Molina, H., Salem, K.: Sagas. In: SIGMOD 1987, pp. 249–259 (1987)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaiser, G., Pu, C.: Dynamic restructuring of transactions. Database Transaction Models for Advanced Applications, 265–295 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pu, C., Kaiser, G., Hutchinson, N.: Split-transactions for open-ended activities. In: VLDB 1988, pp. 26–37 (1988)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Choi, E., Kanai, T.: XPath-based Concurrency Control for XML Data. In: DEWS 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dekeyser, S., Hidders, J.: Path Locks for XML Document Collaboration. In: WISE 2002, pp. 105–114 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dekeyser, S., Hidders, J.: Conflict scheduling of transactions on XML documents. In: ADC 2004, pp. 93–101 (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jea, K., Chen, S., Wang, S.: Concurrency Control in XML Document Databases: XPath Locking Protocol. In: ICPADS 2002, p. 551 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fiebig, T., Helmer, S., Kanne, C., Moerkotte, G., Neumann, J., Schiele, R., Westmann, T.: Natix: A Technology Overview. In: Web, Web-Services, and Database Systems, pp. 12–33 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haustein, M., Härder, T.: Adjustable Transaction Isolation in XML Database Management Systems. In: Proc. 2nd Int. XML Database Symposium, pp. 173–188 (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haustein, M., Härder, T., Luttenberger, K.: Contest of XML Lock Protocols. In: VLDB 2006, pp. 1069–1080 (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kedem, Z., Silberschatz, A.: Controlling Concurrency Using Locking Protocols (Preliminary Report). In: FOCS, pp. 274–285 (1979)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haustein, M.P., Härder, T.: taDOM: A Tailored Synchronization Concept with Tunable Lock Granularity for the DOM API. In: Kalinichenko, L.A., Manthey, R., Thalheim, B., Wloka, U. (eds.) ADBIS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2798, pp. 88–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    O’Neil, P., O’Neil, E., Pal, S., Cseri, I., Schaller, G., Westbury, N.: ORDPATHs: insert-friendly XML node labels. In: SIGMOD 2004, pp. 903–908 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katja Hose
    • 1
  • Kai-Uwe Sattler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Automation, TU IlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations